Evolution toward early stent removal and reduced antibiotic prophylaxis post-cystectomy.

Jessica L Wenzel, Wesley H Chou, Eric J Robinson, Solange Bassale, Paul Jones, Sudhir Isharwal, Christopher L Amling, Kamran P Sajadi, Jen-Jane Liu
{"title":"Evolution toward early stent removal and reduced antibiotic prophylaxis post-cystectomy.","authors":"Jessica L Wenzel, Wesley H Chou, Eric J Robinson, Solange Bassale, Paul Jones, Sudhir Isharwal, Christopher L Amling, Kamran P Sajadi, Jen-Jane Liu","doi":"10.32604/cju.2025.071079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ideal duration of ureteral stents in cystectomy is unknown, with trends toward earlier removal or foregoing them altogether. To reduce the duration of indwelling stents and antibiotics, we modified the cystectomy pathway at our institution from ~2 weeks of stenting with 30 days of antibiotic prophylaxis to stent removal before discharge with prophylaxis ending one day after stent removal. We evaluated rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) and urine leak in cystectomy patients after these changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion at our institution from 2016-2022. Patients were stratified into early vs. late stent removal (postoperative day [POD] ≤5 or >5). Primary outcomes were the 30-day rate of UTI (positive urine culture with symptoms requiring antibiotics) and urine leak (postoperative drain creatinine measurement ≥2× serum creatinine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 228 patients, 19% had early stent removal. Mean stent removal was POD 4 vs. 18 days in the early vs. late group. The early stent removal group had shorter antibiotic exposure (8.2 vs. 21.9 days, p < 0.001). No differences between the early vs. late stent removal groups were seen for postoperative UTI (9.3 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.77), urine leak (2.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.96), or readmission rates (9.3 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.69). No difference in the rate of hydronephrosis on postoperative imaging was noted between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Iterative decreases in ureteral stent duration as part of a quality improvement initiative enabled reduced postoperative antibiotic exposure without increasing adverse outcomes, including UTI, urine leak, or postoperative hydronephrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":520500,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of urology","volume":"33 3","pages":"649-656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/cju.2025.071079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ideal duration of ureteral stents in cystectomy is unknown, with trends toward earlier removal or foregoing them altogether. To reduce the duration of indwelling stents and antibiotics, we modified the cystectomy pathway at our institution from ~2 weeks of stenting with 30 days of antibiotic prophylaxis to stent removal before discharge with prophylaxis ending one day after stent removal. We evaluated rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) and urine leak in cystectomy patients after these changes.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion at our institution from 2016-2022. Patients were stratified into early vs. late stent removal (postoperative day [POD] ≤5 or >5). Primary outcomes were the 30-day rate of UTI (positive urine culture with symptoms requiring antibiotics) and urine leak (postoperative drain creatinine measurement ≥2× serum creatinine).

Results: Of 228 patients, 19% had early stent removal. Mean stent removal was POD 4 vs. 18 days in the early vs. late group. The early stent removal group had shorter antibiotic exposure (8.2 vs. 21.9 days, p < 0.001). No differences between the early vs. late stent removal groups were seen for postoperative UTI (9.3 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.77), urine leak (2.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.96), or readmission rates (9.3 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.69). No difference in the rate of hydronephrosis on postoperative imaging was noted between the two groups.

Conclusions: Iterative decreases in ureteral stent duration as part of a quality improvement initiative enabled reduced postoperative antibiotic exposure without increasing adverse outcomes, including UTI, urine leak, or postoperative hydronephrosis.

膀胱切除术后早期支架移除和减少抗生素预防的进展。
背景:输尿管支架在膀胱切除术中的理想持续时间尚不清楚,倾向于早期切除或完全放弃输尿管支架。为了减少留置支架和抗生素的时间,我们修改了我院膀胱切除术的路径,从支架放置~2周,30天抗生素预防到出院前支架取出,支架取出后1天结束预防。我们评估膀胱切除术患者在这些改变后的尿路感染(UTI)和尿漏率。方法:我们对2016-2022年在我院接受膀胱切除术并回肠导管改道的患者进行了回顾性分析。将患者分为早期和晚期支架移除(术后一天[POD]≤5或bbb50)。主要结局为30天尿路感染发生率(尿培养阳性,症状需要抗生素治疗)和尿漏(术后引流肌酐测量≥2倍血清肌酐)。结果:228例患者中,19%的患者进行了早期支架移除手术。早期组和晚期组的平均支架取出时间分别为4天和18天。早期支架取出组抗生素暴露时间较短(8.2天对21.9天,p < 0.001)。术后尿路感染(9.3 vs 10.8%, p = 0.77)、尿漏(2.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.96)或再入院率(9.3 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.69)在早期和晚期支架取出组之间均无差异。术后影像学显示两组患者肾积水发生率无差异。结论:输尿管支架持续时间的反复减少作为质量改进举措的一部分,可以减少术后抗生素暴露,而不会增加不良后果,包括尿路感染、尿漏或术后肾积水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书