Tessa Jones, Mohamed K. Benyamine, Evan Bollens-Lund, David J. Meyers, R. Sean Morrison, Claire K. Ankuda
{"title":"Medicare Advantage Prior-Authorizations Are Linked to Racial Differences in End-of-Life Home Health Use","authors":"Tessa Jones, Mohamed K. Benyamine, Evan Bollens-Lund, David J. Meyers, R. Sean Morrison, Claire K. Ankuda","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Medicare-funded home health care is providing critical care to homebound older adults, especially those in the last year of life. In Medicare Advantage, Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander decedents are less likely to receive Medicare home health compared to their counterparts in traditional Medicare.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We aim to investigate if prior authorization contributes to racial and ethnic differences in Medicare home health use at the end of life. In this cross-sectional study, we used a 100% Medicare cohort of adult's age ≥ 66 who died in 2019 and were enrolled in Medicare Advantage. We fit a logistic regression model with and without a Medicare Advantage plan-level fixed effects and tested interactions between decedent race and ethnicity and whether the Medicare Advantage plan required prior authorization for Medicare home health care. All models adjusted for individual and regional characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In our sample of 369,195 decedents (49.3% female, mean age 84.9), 240,339, or 65.1%, were in Medicare Advantage plans that required prior authorization for home health care. Racial and ethnic differences were primarily driven by between-plan differences, with prior authorization increasing differences in utilization between racial and ethnic groups. For example, prior authorization was associated with a 5.60% (95% CI 0.08–0.03) decrease for Hispanics and a 4.05% (95% CI 0.07–0.01) decrease for Asian/Pacific Islanders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that prior authorizations contribute to racial and ethnic differences in the Medicare Advantage program.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 8","pages":"2277-2284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.70556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Medicare-funded home health care is providing critical care to homebound older adults, especially those in the last year of life. In Medicare Advantage, Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander decedents are less likely to receive Medicare home health compared to their counterparts in traditional Medicare.
Methods
We aim to investigate if prior authorization contributes to racial and ethnic differences in Medicare home health use at the end of life. In this cross-sectional study, we used a 100% Medicare cohort of adult's age ≥ 66 who died in 2019 and were enrolled in Medicare Advantage. We fit a logistic regression model with and without a Medicare Advantage plan-level fixed effects and tested interactions between decedent race and ethnicity and whether the Medicare Advantage plan required prior authorization for Medicare home health care. All models adjusted for individual and regional characteristics.
Results
In our sample of 369,195 decedents (49.3% female, mean age 84.9), 240,339, or 65.1%, were in Medicare Advantage plans that required prior authorization for home health care. Racial and ethnic differences were primarily driven by between-plan differences, with prior authorization increasing differences in utilization between racial and ethnic groups. For example, prior authorization was associated with a 5.60% (95% CI 0.08–0.03) decrease for Hispanics and a 4.05% (95% CI 0.07–0.01) decrease for Asian/Pacific Islanders.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that prior authorizations contribute to racial and ethnic differences in the Medicare Advantage program.
背景:医疗保险资助的家庭卫生保健是为居家老年人,特别是那些在生命的最后一年提供关键护理。在“医疗保险优势”项目中,西班牙裔、亚裔或太平洋岛民的遗属与传统医疗保险项目中的遗属相比,不太可能获得医疗保险家庭健康服务。方法:我们的目的是调查是否事先授权有助于种族和民族差异的医疗保险家庭健康使用在生命结束。在这项横断面研究中,我们使用了100%的医疗保险队列,这些队列的年龄≥66岁,于2019年去世,并参加了医疗保险优势计划。我们拟合了一个有和没有医疗保险优势计划水平固定效应的逻辑回归模型,并测试了死者种族和民族之间的相互作用,以及医疗保险优势计划是否需要事先获得医疗保险家庭医疗保健的授权。所有模型都根据个人和地区特征进行了调整。结果:在我们的369,195名死者样本中(49.3%为女性,平均年龄84.9岁),240,339人(65.1%)参加了医疗保险优势计划,该计划要求事先授权进行家庭医疗保健。种族和民族差异主要由计划间差异驱动,预先授权增加了种族和民族群体之间的利用差异。例如,事先授权与西班牙裔患者减少5.60% (95% CI 0.08-0.03)和亚洲/太平洋岛民减少4.05% (95% CI 0.07-0.01)相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,先前的授权导致了医疗保险优势计划的种族和民族差异。
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.