The Effectiveness of Online Versus Group Prenatal Education on Breastfeeding Determinants and Outcomes in Nulliparous Women: A Prospective Cohort Study

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2026-10-11 Epub Date: 2026-07-07 DOI:10.1111/jmwh.70156
Marie-Violaine Ponte MSc, RN, Alexandre Prud'homme BSc, Sonia Semenic PhD, N, Stéphane Turcotte MSc, Maude Laberge PhD, Nils Chaillet PhD, Geneviève Roch PhD, RN
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Online Versus Group Prenatal Education on Breastfeeding Determinants and Outcomes in Nulliparous Women: A Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"Marie-Violaine Ponte MSc, RN,&nbsp;Alexandre Prud'homme BSc,&nbsp;Sonia Semenic PhD, N,&nbsp;Stéphane Turcotte MSc,&nbsp;Maude Laberge PhD,&nbsp;Nils Chaillet PhD,&nbsp;Geneviève Roch PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Prenatal education is key to promoting breastfeeding. To address equity and access challenges, health care facilities are increasingly offering online prenatal education in addition to in-person sessions. This study aimed to estimate the influence of online and group prenatal education services, used separately or together, on breastfeeding determinants (intentions, self-efficacy) and outcomes (initiation, exclusivity) among nulliparous pregnant persons, compared with standard prenatal care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective cohort study was conducted from June 2018 to September 2020 in Québec, Canada with 863 nulliparous pregnant persons from 2 adjacent regions. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 358 participants completed questionnaires at 3 time points about their use of prenatal education services in which breastfeeding-related content was optional. Based on their self-reported use, participants were divided into 5 categories: (1) face-to-face group prenatal education, (2) asynchronous online prenatal education, (3) both (with breastfeeding), (4) either group/online/both (opted out of breastfeeding content), and (5) standard prenatal care only. Repeated-measures analysis of variance, generalized linear mixed models, mixed-effects logistic regression, χ<sup>2</sup>, and Fisher's exact test were conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 53.3% of participants chose the prenatal education services with breastfeeding information. When compared with standard prenatal care only, exposure to breastfeeding information from the online option alone or from both services was associated with breastfeeding intentions and initiation. No prenatal education services were associated with self-efficacy or exclusivity; however, higher prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy predicted exclusivity 4 weeks after childbirth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Study findings highlight the complementary contribution of asynchronous online and in-person group prenatal education services to breastfeeding, adding to the scant literature comparing these educational options. This can help health care providers, decision-makers, and policy makers identify avenues to strengthen equity in the administration of breastfeeding education, thereby providing expectant persons with better strategies for choosing and maintaining breastfeeding.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"71 5","pages":"771-781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.70156","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.70156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Prenatal education is key to promoting breastfeeding. To address equity and access challenges, health care facilities are increasingly offering online prenatal education in addition to in-person sessions. This study aimed to estimate the influence of online and group prenatal education services, used separately or together, on breastfeeding determinants (intentions, self-efficacy) and outcomes (initiation, exclusivity) among nulliparous pregnant persons, compared with standard prenatal care.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted from June 2018 to September 2020 in Québec, Canada with 863 nulliparous pregnant persons from 2 adjacent regions. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 358 participants completed questionnaires at 3 time points about their use of prenatal education services in which breastfeeding-related content was optional. Based on their self-reported use, participants were divided into 5 categories: (1) face-to-face group prenatal education, (2) asynchronous online prenatal education, (3) both (with breastfeeding), (4) either group/online/both (opted out of breastfeeding content), and (5) standard prenatal care only. Repeated-measures analysis of variance, generalized linear mixed models, mixed-effects logistic regression, χ2, and Fisher's exact test were conducted.

Results

A total of 53.3% of participants chose the prenatal education services with breastfeeding information. When compared with standard prenatal care only, exposure to breastfeeding information from the online option alone or from both services was associated with breastfeeding intentions and initiation. No prenatal education services were associated with self-efficacy or exclusivity; however, higher prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy predicted exclusivity 4 weeks after childbirth.

Discussion

Study findings highlight the complementary contribution of asynchronous online and in-person group prenatal education services to breastfeeding, adding to the scant literature comparing these educational options. This can help health care providers, decision-makers, and policy makers identify avenues to strengthen equity in the administration of breastfeeding education, thereby providing expectant persons with better strategies for choosing and maintaining breastfeeding.

在线与团体产前教育对未生育妇女母乳喂养决定因素和结局的有效性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
产前教育是促进母乳喂养的关键。为了解决公平和获得机会的挑战,除了面对面的会议之外,卫生保健机构越来越多地提供在线产前教育。本研究旨在评估在线和团体产前教育服务(单独使用或一起使用)与标准产前护理相比,对未生育孕妇母乳喂养决定因素(意图、自我效能)和结果(开始、排他性)的影响。方法:2018年6月至2020年9月,在加拿大quamesbec对来自2个相邻地区的863名未生育孕妇进行前瞻性队列研究。在COVID-19大流行之前,358名参与者在3个时间点完成了关于他们使用产前教育服务的问卷调查,其中母乳喂养相关的内容是可选的。根据参与者自我报告的使用情况,将参与者分为5类:(1)面对面组产前教育,(2)异步在线产前教育,(3)两者(母乳喂养),(4)任一组/在线/两者(选择退出母乳喂养内容),(5)标准产前护理。进行了重复测量方差分析、广义线性混合模型、混合效应logistic回归、χ2和Fisher精确检验。结果:共有53.3%的参与者选择了提供母乳喂养信息的产前教育服务。与仅标准的产前护理相比,仅从在线选项或从两种服务中获得母乳喂养信息与母乳喂养意图和开始有关。产前教育服务与自我效能感或排他性无关;然而,较高的产前母乳喂养自我效能预示着分娩后4周的排他性。讨论:研究结果强调了异步在线和面对面小组产前教育服务对母乳喂养的补充作用,补充了比较这些教育选择的文献。这可以帮助卫生保健提供者、决策者和政策制定者确定加强母乳喂养教育管理公平性的途径,从而为孕妇提供更好的选择和维持母乳喂养的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书