Hearing aids in low- and middle-income countries: from evidence to scale.

IF 2.7
Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2026.2701375
De Wet Swanepoel, Caitlin Frisby, Vinay Manchaiah
{"title":"Hearing aids in low- and middle-income countries: from evidence to scale.","authors":"De Wet Swanepoel, Caitlin Frisby, Vinay Manchaiah","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2026.2701375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hearing loss affects more than 1.5 billion people globally, with nearly 80% of disabling cases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite being the most established rehabilitation technology, fewer than 10% of those in need in LMICs possess them, with rates as low as 2% across Africa and Southeast Asia.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review synthesizes evidence on barriers to hearing aid access in LMICs, including workforce shortages, prohibitive costs and trade barriers, geographic centralization, and stigma across internalized, social, and structural dimensions, and evaluates strategies to overcome them. These include task-sharing using community health workers (CHWs), mobile health (mHealth) and tele-audiology, preset and over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, rechargeable devices, mHealth adherence support, and health systems policy reforms.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Closing this gap requires a shift toward decentralized, community-based care supported by digital technologies. Evidence supports CHW-facilitated hearing aid provision with structured counseling and mHealth acclimatization support, as a feasible, effective, and acceptable rehabilitation model. Future progress depends on embedding hearing care within universal health coverage, reforming cost-inflating trade policies, and investing in implementation science to evaluate the fidelity, scalability, and sustainability of effective models. These models also apply to underserved populations in high-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"967-980"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2026.2701375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hearing loss affects more than 1.5 billion people globally, with nearly 80% of disabling cases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite being the most established rehabilitation technology, fewer than 10% of those in need in LMICs possess them, with rates as low as 2% across Africa and Southeast Asia.

Areas covered: This review synthesizes evidence on barriers to hearing aid access in LMICs, including workforce shortages, prohibitive costs and trade barriers, geographic centralization, and stigma across internalized, social, and structural dimensions, and evaluates strategies to overcome them. These include task-sharing using community health workers (CHWs), mobile health (mHealth) and tele-audiology, preset and over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, rechargeable devices, mHealth adherence support, and health systems policy reforms.

Expert opinion: Closing this gap requires a shift toward decentralized, community-based care supported by digital technologies. Evidence supports CHW-facilitated hearing aid provision with structured counseling and mHealth acclimatization support, as a feasible, effective, and acceptable rehabilitation model. Future progress depends on embedding hearing care within universal health coverage, reforming cost-inflating trade policies, and investing in implementation science to evaluate the fidelity, scalability, and sustainability of effective models. These models also apply to underserved populations in high-income countries.

中低收入国家的助听器:从证据到规模。
导读:听力损失影响着全球超过15亿人,其中近80%的致残病例发生在低收入和中等收入国家。尽管这是最成熟的康复技术,但在中低收入国家中,只有不到10%的有需要的人拥有它们,而在非洲和东南亚,这一比例低至2%。涵盖领域:本综述综合了中低收入国家助听器获取障碍的证据,包括劳动力短缺、高昂的成本和贸易壁垒、地理集中化以及内部化、社会和结构层面的耻辱感,并评估了克服这些障碍的策略。其中包括利用社区卫生工作者(chw)、移动医疗(mHealth)和远程听力学、预设和非处方助听器(OTC)、可充电设备、移动医疗依从性支持以及卫生系统政策改革来分担任务。专家意见:要缩小这一差距,需要向数字技术支持的分散式、基于社区的护理转变。证据支持chw促进助听器提供结构化咨询和移动健康适应支持,作为一种可行、有效和可接受的康复模式。未来的进展取决于将听力保健纳入全民健康覆盖,改革成本膨胀的贸易政策,并投资于实施科学,以评估有效模式的保真度、可扩展性和可持续性。这些模式也适用于高收入国家服务不足的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书