Fluid tolerance in septic shock: Femoral vein pulsatility versus VExUS score in a cross-sectional study.

M A Sahbal, A A Hemeda, S Fawzy, S Gaber
{"title":"Fluid tolerance in septic shock: Femoral vein pulsatility versus VExUS score in a cross-sectional study.","authors":"M A Sahbal, A A Hemeda, S Fawzy, S Gaber","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2026.v42i1.2816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock is associated with acute organ injury and increased mortality. Accurate assessment of fluid tolerance is therefore essential. Right cardiac chamber fluid tolerance can be evaluated by estimating the right atrial pressure using central venous catheters, inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements, Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) scores and femoral vein pulsatility (FVP).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the correlation between FVP and VExUS score in evaluating fluid intolerance and venous congestion in patients with septic shock; the correlation of FVP and VExUS score with central venous pressure (CVP); and to evaluate the effect of positive pressure ventilation on the relationship between FVP and VExUS score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational cross-sectional study, 80 participants were assessed for fluid tolerance using VExUS scores and FVP. CVP, maximum and minimum IVC diameters and IVC dynamicity were regarded as the gold standard and used as reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FVP showed moderate agreement with VExUS score (Kappa=0.55; p<0.001). Both FVP and VExUS score demonstrated the ability to predict CVP values ≥17 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with overall accuracies of 70% and 77.5%, respectively (p<0.001). A CVP ≥17.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O predicted severely congested femoral veins with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 90%, whereas a CVP ≥18.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O predicted VExUS grade 3 with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 83.3%. Maximum IVC diameter accurately predicted abnormal femoral vein Doppler findings, with an overall accuracy of 82.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A pulsatile femoral vein pattern indicates fluid intolerance in patients with septic shock, providing an additional marker for assessing fluid status. Doppler assessment of the femoral vein offers advantages of easier anatomical accessibility and a shorter learning curve compared with other methods.</p><p><strong>Contribution of the study: </strong>This study evaluated a simple rapid tool (femoral vein pulsability) in assessing volume state and fluid tolerance in septic patients in comparison with VExsus.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"42 1","pages":"e2816"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13340743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2026.v42i1.2816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock is associated with acute organ injury and increased mortality. Accurate assessment of fluid tolerance is therefore essential. Right cardiac chamber fluid tolerance can be evaluated by estimating the right atrial pressure using central venous catheters, inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements, Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) scores and femoral vein pulsatility (FVP).

Objectives: To assess the correlation between FVP and VExUS score in evaluating fluid intolerance and venous congestion in patients with septic shock; the correlation of FVP and VExUS score with central venous pressure (CVP); and to evaluate the effect of positive pressure ventilation on the relationship between FVP and VExUS score.

Methods: In this observational cross-sectional study, 80 participants were assessed for fluid tolerance using VExUS scores and FVP. CVP, maximum and minimum IVC diameters and IVC dynamicity were regarded as the gold standard and used as reference.

Results: FVP showed moderate agreement with VExUS score (Kappa=0.55; p<0.001). Both FVP and VExUS score demonstrated the ability to predict CVP values ≥17 cmH2O with overall accuracies of 70% and 77.5%, respectively (p<0.001). A CVP ≥17.5 cmH2O predicted severely congested femoral veins with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 90%, whereas a CVP ≥18.5 cmH2O predicted VExUS grade 3 with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 83.3%. Maximum IVC diameter accurately predicted abnormal femoral vein Doppler findings, with an overall accuracy of 82.5%.

Conclusion: A pulsatile femoral vein pattern indicates fluid intolerance in patients with septic shock, providing an additional marker for assessing fluid status. Doppler assessment of the femoral vein offers advantages of easier anatomical accessibility and a shorter learning curve compared with other methods.

Contribution of the study: This study evaluated a simple rapid tool (femoral vein pulsability) in assessing volume state and fluid tolerance in septic patients in comparison with VExsus.

脓毒性休克的液体耐受性:横断面研究中股静脉搏动与VExUS评分
背景:脓毒性休克患者的过度液体复苏与急性器官损伤和死亡率增加有关。因此,准确评估液体耐受性至关重要。通过使用中心静脉导管、下腔静脉(IVC)测量、静脉过量超声(VExUS)评分和股静脉脉动(FVP)评估右心房压力,可以评估右心室液体耐受性。目的:探讨FVP与VExUS评分在评价脓毒性休克患者液体不耐受和静脉充血中的相关性;FVP、VExUS评分与中心静脉压(CVP)的相关性;评价正压通气对FVP与VExUS评分关系的影响。方法:在这项观察性横断面研究中,使用VExUS评分和FVP评估80名参与者的液体耐受性。以CVP、IVC最大、最小直径和IVC动力学为金标准,作为参考。结果:FVP与VExUS评分具有中等一致性(Kappa=0.55; p2O总体准确率分别为70%和77.5% (p2O预测股静脉严重充血的敏感性为70%,特异性为90%,而CVP≥18.5 cmH2O预测VExUS 3级的敏感性为66.7%,特异性为83.3%)。最大下腔静脉直径准确预测异常股静脉多普勒结果,总体准确率为82.5%。结论:脉动性股静脉形态提示脓毒性休克患者的液体不耐受,为评估液体状态提供了一个额外的标志。与其他方法相比,多普勒评估股静脉具有解剖可及性更容易和学习曲线更短的优点。研究贡献:本研究评估了一种简单的快速工具(股静脉搏动性),用于评估脓毒症患者的容量状态和液体耐受性,并与VExsus进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书