Enteral feeding barriers in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Ghana.

E K Anku, L T Hill, M A Agyarko, O E Ekor, G Akafity, S A Amoo, S O Lamptey, N Kumi
{"title":"Enteral feeding barriers in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Ghana.","authors":"E K Anku, L T Hill, M A Agyarko, O E Ekor, G Akafity, S A Amoo, S O Lamptey, N Kumi","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2026.v42i1.3661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enteral nutrition (EN) is an important aspect of patient management in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, various barriers have been reported that limit the provision of EN, with implications for patient care and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the perceived barriers to the provision of EN among ICU healthcare professionals in our resource-limited setting, as a preliminary step toward developing tailored quality improvement interventions in our unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 21 ICU healthcare professionals (17 nurses and 4 doctors) was conducted. The Revised Barriers to Feeding Critically Ill Patients questionnaire was used to evaluate barriers to the provision of EN in our ICU. A Likert scale was used to assess perceived barriers, with each factor rated from 0 to 6; 0 indicating 'not at all' and 6 indicating 'an extreme amount'. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data as medians, interquartile ranges, counts and proportions. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate differences in medians between doctors and nurses, given the skewed distribution of data. Likert-based responses were used to generate a stacked bar chart. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main barriers to the provision of EN were related to dietitian support, ICU resources and EN delivery. Dietitian-related barriers included insufficient coverage on weekends, evenings and holidays (median 5), delayed nutritional assessments (median 3) and limited time dedicated to education and training on optimal feeding (median 3). ICU resource constraints included the absence or shortage of feeding pumps and the unavailability of enteral formulas (median 3 for both). Barriers to EN delivery included delayed initiation of motility agents in patients with feeding intolerance (median 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscored the importance of developing context-specific quality improvement initiatives to address local barriers to the provision of EN.</p><p><strong>Contribution of the study: </strong>This study describes the perceived barriers to the provision of enteral nutrition in an intensive care unit (ICU) in Ghana, adding to the limited data available from African ICUs on this topic. The study provides insights into the systemic, operational, and workforce-related challenges that affect enteral feeding in resource-constrained critical care settings, including limited dietitian coverage, shortage of feeding pumps, and enteral formulas. These challenges highlight the needs and opportunities for strengthening nutrition support through context-specific quality improvement initiatives. As such, this work contributes valuable locally generated evidence to support enhanced care for critically ill patients as well as inform professional development strategies for ICU healthcare professionals in similar low-resource environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"42 1","pages":"e3661"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13340738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2026.v42i1.3661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is an important aspect of patient management in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, various barriers have been reported that limit the provision of EN, with implications for patient care and outcomes.

Objectives: To evaluate the perceived barriers to the provision of EN among ICU healthcare professionals in our resource-limited setting, as a preliminary step toward developing tailored quality improvement interventions in our unit.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 21 ICU healthcare professionals (17 nurses and 4 doctors) was conducted. The Revised Barriers to Feeding Critically Ill Patients questionnaire was used to evaluate barriers to the provision of EN in our ICU. A Likert scale was used to assess perceived barriers, with each factor rated from 0 to 6; 0 indicating 'not at all' and 6 indicating 'an extreme amount'. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data as medians, interquartile ranges, counts and proportions. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate differences in medians between doctors and nurses, given the skewed distribution of data. Likert-based responses were used to generate a stacked bar chart. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: The main barriers to the provision of EN were related to dietitian support, ICU resources and EN delivery. Dietitian-related barriers included insufficient coverage on weekends, evenings and holidays (median 5), delayed nutritional assessments (median 3) and limited time dedicated to education and training on optimal feeding (median 3). ICU resource constraints included the absence or shortage of feeding pumps and the unavailability of enteral formulas (median 3 for both). Barriers to EN delivery included delayed initiation of motility agents in patients with feeding intolerance (median 3).

Conclusion: These findings underscored the importance of developing context-specific quality improvement initiatives to address local barriers to the provision of EN.

Contribution of the study: This study describes the perceived barriers to the provision of enteral nutrition in an intensive care unit (ICU) in Ghana, adding to the limited data available from African ICUs on this topic. The study provides insights into the systemic, operational, and workforce-related challenges that affect enteral feeding in resource-constrained critical care settings, including limited dietitian coverage, shortage of feeding pumps, and enteral formulas. These challenges highlight the needs and opportunities for strengthening nutrition support through context-specific quality improvement initiatives. As such, this work contributes valuable locally generated evidence to support enhanced care for critically ill patients as well as inform professional development strategies for ICU healthcare professionals in similar low-resource environments.

加纳一家三级医院重症监护室的肠内喂养障碍。
背景:肠内营养(EN)是重症监护病房(ICU)患者管理的一个重要方面。然而,据报道,各种障碍限制了EN的提供,这对患者的护理和结果有影响。目的:评估在我们资源有限的环境中,ICU医护人员提供EN的感知障碍,作为在我们单位开发量身定制的质量改进干预措施的初步步骤。方法:对21名ICU医护人员(17名护士,4名医生)进行横断面调查。使用修订后的危重病人喂养障碍问卷来评估我们ICU提供EN的障碍。李克特量表用于评估感知障碍,每个因素的评分从0到6;0表示“完全没有”,6表示“非常多”。描述性统计用于将数据描述为中位数、四分位数范围、计数和比例。Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验用于评估医生和护士之间的中位数差异,因为数据分布偏倚。李克特式的回答被用来生成堆叠条形图。结果:提供EN的主要障碍与营养师支持、ICU资源和EN的交付有关。与营养师相关的障碍包括周末、晚上和节假日的覆盖率不足(中位数为5),营养评估延迟(中位数为3),以及用于最佳喂养教育和培训的时间有限(中位数为3)。ICU资源限制包括没有或缺乏喂养泵和无法获得肠内配方液(两者的中位数均为3)。EN递送的障碍包括进食不耐受患者延迟使用运动药物(中位数为3)。结论:这些发现强调了制定针对具体情况的质量改进计划的重要性,以解决当地提供EN的障碍。研究贡献:本研究描述了加纳重症监护病房(ICU)提供肠内营养的感知障碍,补充了非洲ICU关于该主题的有限数据。该研究深入了解了在资源有限的重症监护环境中影响肠内喂养的系统性、操作性和与劳动力相关的挑战,包括营养学家覆盖率有限、喂养泵短缺和肠内配方。这些挑战凸显了通过针对具体情况的质量改进举措加强营养支持的需求和机遇。因此,这项工作提供了有价值的本地产生的证据,以支持加强对危重病人的护理,并为类似低资源环境中的ICU医疗保健专业人员的专业发展战略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书