[Indications for and claims to dental specialties: case studies].

R H Kaandorp, J W M Hoekstra
{"title":"[Indications for and claims to dental specialties: case studies].","authors":"R H Kaandorp, J W M Hoekstra","doi":"10.5177/ntvt.2026.07/08.26029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the second part of this two-part article on dental specialties, the application of article 2.7 of the Healthcare Insurance Decree is explained on the basis of cases relevant to the clinical practice. While part 1 describes the legal parameters, this article addresses daily decision-making in the general dental practice. When reimbursement can be claimed and when it cannot, within the regulatory framework for dental specialties, is illustrated on the basis of examples from prosthetic and implant practice. The distinction between treatment indication and the right to reimbursement, and its application, are central. With this, dentists are offered guidance on indication, applications for authorization, and communicating with patients, with the aim of preventing incorrect referrals and disappointment, and promoting the effective use of the regulatory framework for dental specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":74255,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","volume":"133 7-08","pages":"328-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2026.07/08.26029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the second part of this two-part article on dental specialties, the application of article 2.7 of the Healthcare Insurance Decree is explained on the basis of cases relevant to the clinical practice. While part 1 describes the legal parameters, this article addresses daily decision-making in the general dental practice. When reimbursement can be claimed and when it cannot, within the regulatory framework for dental specialties, is illustrated on the basis of examples from prosthetic and implant practice. The distinction between treatment indication and the right to reimbursement, and its application, are central. With this, dentists are offered guidance on indication, applications for authorization, and communicating with patients, with the aim of preventing incorrect referrals and disappointment, and promoting the effective use of the regulatory framework for dental specialties.

[牙科专科的适应症和要求:案例研究]。
在这篇由两部分组成的关于牙科专业的文章的第二部分中,根据与临床实践有关的案例,解释了《医疗保险法令》第2.7条的适用。虽然第1部分描述了法律参数,这篇文章解决了日常决策在一般牙科实践。在牙科专业的监管框架内,什么时候可以报销,什么时候不能报销,根据假体和种植体实践的例子说明。治疗指征和报销权之间的区别及其应用是中心问题。这样,牙医就可以在适应症、授权申请和与患者沟通方面获得指导,目的是防止不正确的转诊和失望,并促进有效利用牙科专业监管框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书