Bone stability after regenerative peri-implantitis treatment: A 10-year follow-up case study

IF 1.3 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical Advances in Periodontics Pub Date : 2026-09-24 Epub Date: 2026-07-08 DOI:10.1002/cap.10359
Stefano Parma-Benfenati, Marisa Roncati, Lucrezia Parma-Benfenati, Paolo Nava
{"title":"Bone stability after regenerative peri-implantitis treatment: A 10-year follow-up case study","authors":"Stefano Parma-Benfenati,&nbsp;Marisa Roncati,&nbsp;Lucrezia Parma-Benfenati,&nbsp;Paolo Nava","doi":"10.1002/cap.10359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Peri-implantitis poses a significant challenge to implant longevity, leading to progressive bone loss and potential implant failure. While reconstructive surgery has been proven effective in regenerating peri-implant tissues, the long-term stability of the regenerated tissues and the impact of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) on bone levels remains underexplored. This case study presents a 10-year follow-up of a patient treated with reconstructive surgery for peri-implantitis and enrolled in a structured maintenance program.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A 68-year-old male with a failing implant in the mandibular right first molar was treated using a reconstructive approach involving surface decontamination, particulate bone grafts, and an acellular dermal matrix as a barrier. Three re-entry procedures were performed over a 10-year period: at 9 months for the second stage of the two-step GBR procedure and at 8 and 10 years for implant placement to replace fractured teeth. These interventions allowed for direct clinical and radiographic assessment of bone-level changes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At 9 months, bone regeneration was observed with minor residual dehiscences. After 8 years, bone remodeling and crestal bone gain on the lingual aspect were noted in the absence of further surgical interventions. At 10 years, radiographic evaluations confirmed minimal changes in marginal bone levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The presented two-stage regenerative approach successfully restored peri-implant health and function over time while minimizing the patient's financial burden. The three re-entry procedures provided direct clinical evidence of bone regeneration and demonstrated the positive impact of effective maintenance therapy on marginal bone levels and their long-term stability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>\n <p>The described regenerative treatment for peri-implantitis may ensure long-term satisfactory outcomes.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li>\n <p>Supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) is effective in preventing disease recurrence and may improve crestal bone levels over time.</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain language summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study presents the case of a 68-year-old patient with a failing dental implant due to peri-implantitis. The implant was treated by thoroughly cleaning its surface, placing bone grafts, and using a protective membrane to regenerate bone around the fixture and obtain disease resolution. The patient returned for three follow-up surgeries over 10 years, providing a unique opportunity to directly examine bone stability around the implant. Direct observations revealed that the bone graft healed well within the first 9 months, and the regenerated peri-implant bone remained stable with minimal changes for a decade. Regular check-ups and cleanings also helped prevent disease recurrence and further bone loss. By saving the existing implant, the patient avoided the extra expenses of removing and replacing it. Overall, these results suggest that a regenerative surgical approach, combined with structured maintenance care, can help obtain disease resolution and maintain stable long-term outcomes. This can improve comfort and function while reducing costs for patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":"16 3","pages":"477-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cap.10359","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cap.10359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Peri-implantitis poses a significant challenge to implant longevity, leading to progressive bone loss and potential implant failure. While reconstructive surgery has been proven effective in regenerating peri-implant tissues, the long-term stability of the regenerated tissues and the impact of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) on bone levels remains underexplored. This case study presents a 10-year follow-up of a patient treated with reconstructive surgery for peri-implantitis and enrolled in a structured maintenance program.

Methods

A 68-year-old male with a failing implant in the mandibular right first molar was treated using a reconstructive approach involving surface decontamination, particulate bone grafts, and an acellular dermal matrix as a barrier. Three re-entry procedures were performed over a 10-year period: at 9 months for the second stage of the two-step GBR procedure and at 8 and 10 years for implant placement to replace fractured teeth. These interventions allowed for direct clinical and radiographic assessment of bone-level changes.

Results

At 9 months, bone regeneration was observed with minor residual dehiscences. After 8 years, bone remodeling and crestal bone gain on the lingual aspect were noted in the absence of further surgical interventions. At 10 years, radiographic evaluations confirmed minimal changes in marginal bone levels.

Conclusions

The presented two-stage regenerative approach successfully restored peri-implant health and function over time while minimizing the patient's financial burden. The three re-entry procedures provided direct clinical evidence of bone regeneration and demonstrated the positive impact of effective maintenance therapy on marginal bone levels and their long-term stability.

Key points

  • The described regenerative treatment for peri-implantitis may ensure long-term satisfactory outcomes.

  • Supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) is effective in preventing disease recurrence and may improve crestal bone levels over time.

Plain language summary

This study presents the case of a 68-year-old patient with a failing dental implant due to peri-implantitis. The implant was treated by thoroughly cleaning its surface, placing bone grafts, and using a protective membrane to regenerate bone around the fixture and obtain disease resolution. The patient returned for three follow-up surgeries over 10 years, providing a unique opportunity to directly examine bone stability around the implant. Direct observations revealed that the bone graft healed well within the first 9 months, and the regenerated peri-implant bone remained stable with minimal changes for a decade. Regular check-ups and cleanings also helped prevent disease recurrence and further bone loss. By saving the existing implant, the patient avoided the extra expenses of removing and replacing it. Overall, these results suggest that a regenerative surgical approach, combined with structured maintenance care, can help obtain disease resolution and maintain stable long-term outcomes. This can improve comfort and function while reducing costs for patients.

再生种植体周围炎治疗后的骨稳定性:10年随访病例研究。
背景:种植体周围炎对种植体寿命构成重大挑战,导致进行性骨质流失和潜在的种植体失效。虽然重建手术已被证明在再生种植体周围组织方面是有效的,但再生组织的长期稳定性和支持种植体周围护理(SPIC)对骨水平的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本病例研究对一名接受种植体周围炎重建手术的患者进行了10年的随访,并纳入了结构化的维护计划。方法:一名68岁男性下颌第一磨牙种植失败,采用表面净化、颗粒骨移植和脱细胞真皮基质作为屏障的重建方法进行治疗。在10年期间进行了三次再入牙手术:第二期两步GBR手术9个月,种植体放置8年和10年,以取代断裂的牙齿。这些干预措施允许对骨水平变化进行直接的临床和放射学评估。结果:在9个月时,观察到骨再生,并有少量残余开裂。8年后,在没有进一步手术干预的情况下,舌侧骨重塑和嵴骨增加。10年时,x线检查证实边缘骨水平变化很小。结论:所提出的两阶段再生方法随着时间的推移成功地恢复了种植体周围的健康和功能,同时减少了患者的经济负担。三种再入手术提供了骨再生的直接临床证据,并证明了有效的维持治疗对边缘骨水平及其长期稳定性的积极影响。重点:所描述的种植体周围炎的再生治疗可以确保长期满意的结果。支持性种植体周围护理(SPIC)在预防疾病复发方面是有效的,并可能随着时间的推移改善牙冠骨水平。摘要:本研究报告了一位68岁的患者,由于种植体周围炎导致种植体失败。种植体的处理方法是彻底清洁其表面,放置骨移植物,并使用保护膜在固定物周围再生骨并获得疾病解决。患者在10年的时间里进行了三次后续手术,这为直接检查种植体周围的骨稳定性提供了一个独特的机会。直接观察显示,骨移植物在前9个月内愈合良好,再生的种植体周围骨在10年内保持稳定,变化很小。定期检查和清洁也有助于防止疾病复发和进一步的骨质流失。通过保留现有的种植体,患者避免了移除和更换种植体的额外费用。总的来说,这些结果表明再生手术方法,结合结构化的维持护理,可以帮助获得疾病的解决和维持稳定的长期结果。这可以改善舒适度和功能,同时降低患者的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书