Polygenic risk scores in pharmacogenomics: methodological challenges, current applications, and perspectives for clinical implementation.

IF 1.4 4区 生物学
Medizinische Genetik Pub Date : 2026-07-08 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1515/medgen-2026-3013
Carina M Mathey, Martin Coenen, Ingolf Cascorbi, Per Hoffmann
{"title":"Polygenic risk scores in pharmacogenomics: methodological challenges, current applications, and perspectives for clinical implementation.","authors":"Carina M Mathey, Martin Coenen, Ingolf Cascorbi, Per Hoffmann","doi":"10.1515/medgen-2026-3013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inter-individual variability in drug response remains a major challenge in clinical pharmacology. While clinical pharmacogenetics is largely based on actionable single-gene variants, increasing GWAS evidence indicates that many drug-response phenotypes are polygenic. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer a framework to capture cumulative effects across pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease-related pathways, enabeling probabilistic risk stratification beyond monogenic models. This review summarizes the current status of PRS in pharmacogenomics (PGx-PRS), highlighting key challenges including limited sample sizes of drug-exposed cohorts, heterogeneous phenotype definitions, ancestry-related portability issues, and incomplete representation of complex pharmacogenes such as <i>CPY2D6</i>. Current applications are discussed across cardiovascular, psychiatric, and oncological settings, where PRS show emerging potential for benefit-risk stratification but remain insufficiently validated for routine care. Clinical implementation will require standardized methodologies multi-ancestry validation, integration with rare-high impact ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion) variants, and clearer regulatory pathways. With these advances, PGx-PRS may become clinically relevant tools for precision prescribing and drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":51130,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Genetik","volume":"38 3","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13340549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Genetik","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/medgen-2026-3013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inter-individual variability in drug response remains a major challenge in clinical pharmacology. While clinical pharmacogenetics is largely based on actionable single-gene variants, increasing GWAS evidence indicates that many drug-response phenotypes are polygenic. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer a framework to capture cumulative effects across pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease-related pathways, enabeling probabilistic risk stratification beyond monogenic models. This review summarizes the current status of PRS in pharmacogenomics (PGx-PRS), highlighting key challenges including limited sample sizes of drug-exposed cohorts, heterogeneous phenotype definitions, ancestry-related portability issues, and incomplete representation of complex pharmacogenes such as CPY2D6. Current applications are discussed across cardiovascular, psychiatric, and oncological settings, where PRS show emerging potential for benefit-risk stratification but remain insufficiently validated for routine care. Clinical implementation will require standardized methodologies multi-ancestry validation, integration with rare-high impact ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion) variants, and clearer regulatory pathways. With these advances, PGx-PRS may become clinically relevant tools for precision prescribing and drug development.

药物基因组学中的多基因风险评分:方法学上的挑战、当前的应用和临床实施的前景。
药物反应的个体差异仍然是临床药理学的主要挑战。虽然临床药物遗传学主要基于可操作的单基因变异,但越来越多的GWAS证据表明,许多药物反应表型是多基因的。多基因风险评分(PRS)提供了一个框架来捕捉跨药代动力学、药效学和疾病相关途径的累积效应,使概率风险分层超越单基因模型。本文总结了药物基因组学(PGx-PRS)中PRS的现状,强调了主要挑战,包括药物暴露队列的样本量有限,异质性表型定义,与祖先相关的可移植性问题,以及复杂药物基因(如CPY2D6)的不完整代表。目前在心血管、精神病学和肿瘤学领域的应用被讨论,在这些领域,PRS显示出益处风险分层的潜力,但在常规护理中仍未得到充分验证。临床实施将需要标准化的方法,多祖先验证,整合罕见的高影响ADME(吸收、分布、代谢和排泄)变异,以及更清晰的调节途径。随着这些进展,PGx-PRS可能成为临床相关的精确处方和药物开发工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medizinische Genetik
Medizinische Genetik GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: medizinischegenetik is a scientific journal that is owned and published by the German Society of Human Genetics e.V. since 1989. The journal was founded by Prof. Jan Murken, München. Self-published until 2006, from 2007-2019 published at Springer Verlag and since 2020 at De Gruyter. medizinischegenetik serves education and training among colleagues, the interdisciplinary exchange of knowledge in all areas of human genetics in clinics, practice, research and teaching. Each issue of the quarterly journal deals with a focus that provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in specific clinical pictures, technical developments and therapeutic approaches. All reviews are written in English language. The journal thus creates a platform for the international exchange of knowledge and increased awareness of German research activities in the scientific community. In addition, medizinischegenetik contains information on activities in its own subject in the German-language section. This includes conference reports, association announcements, personnel matters, statements and guidelines. With health policy questions, historical retrospectives and comments on current developments, the profession takes a stand on human genetic issues in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书