Knee Bracing after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Protocols and Postoperative Outcomes.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Margaret G Grossman, Rebecca Luft, Elizabeth Huggins, Jackson Paras, Mitchell J Christiansen, Mary Mulcahey
{"title":"Knee Bracing after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Protocols and Postoperative Outcomes.","authors":"Margaret G Grossman, Rebecca Luft, Elizabeth Huggins, Jackson Paras, Mitchell J Christiansen, Mary Mulcahey","doi":"10.1055/a-2908-2717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) is the most common procedure performed for recurrent patellar instability. Although the benefits of MPFLr are well-established, postoperative bracing protocols remain highly variable and poorly characterized in the current literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of bracing by sports medicine surgeons for patients following MPFLr. Randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective studies of patellar instability treated with MPFLr were identified across three databases: EMBASE (Elsevier), Medline (OVID), and SportDiscus with Full Text (EBSCOHost). Study quality was assessed using established risk of bias tools; several studies demonstrated moderate risk of bias due to nonrandom selection of intervention groups and variability in rehabilitation. Data collected included functional outcomes and rates of redislocation or subluxation. Of 521 studies identified, 112 duplicates were removed. Abstracts of 409 studies were reviewed, with 348 excluded for relevance. Full-text review of 61 studies yielded seven meeting inclusion criteria, all of which included postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Five studies (71.4%) used knee braces postoperatively, and two (28.6%) compared postoperative bracing to no bracing. Four studies (57.1%) reported using a hinged knee brace and two (28.6%) used a knee immobilizer. Six of seven studies (85.7%) braced patients for up to 6 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative instability events were reported in six studies (85.7%), collectively encompassing 650 knees. Bracing was applied to 533 knees, of which 25 (4.7%) experienced at least one instability event, compared with 1 of 117 nonbraced knees (0.9%). There was no statistically significant difference in instability events between groups (χ<sup>2</sup> [1, <i>N</i> = 650] = 3.68, <i>p</i> = 0.055). Most sports medicine surgeons brace patients for up to 6 weeks following MPFLr. Bracing protocols are widely variable, and current studies exhibit marked heterogeneity in reporting of postoperative outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the optimal postoperative rehabilitation protocol, including the use of a hinged knee brace, following MPFLr.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2908-2717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) is the most common procedure performed for recurrent patellar instability. Although the benefits of MPFLr are well-established, postoperative bracing protocols remain highly variable and poorly characterized in the current literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of bracing by sports medicine surgeons for patients following MPFLr. Randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective studies of patellar instability treated with MPFLr were identified across three databases: EMBASE (Elsevier), Medline (OVID), and SportDiscus with Full Text (EBSCOHost). Study quality was assessed using established risk of bias tools; several studies demonstrated moderate risk of bias due to nonrandom selection of intervention groups and variability in rehabilitation. Data collected included functional outcomes and rates of redislocation or subluxation. Of 521 studies identified, 112 duplicates were removed. Abstracts of 409 studies were reviewed, with 348 excluded for relevance. Full-text review of 61 studies yielded seven meeting inclusion criteria, all of which included postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Five studies (71.4%) used knee braces postoperatively, and two (28.6%) compared postoperative bracing to no bracing. Four studies (57.1%) reported using a hinged knee brace and two (28.6%) used a knee immobilizer. Six of seven studies (85.7%) braced patients for up to 6 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative instability events were reported in six studies (85.7%), collectively encompassing 650 knees. Bracing was applied to 533 knees, of which 25 (4.7%) experienced at least one instability event, compared with 1 of 117 nonbraced knees (0.9%). There was no statistically significant difference in instability events between groups (χ2 [1, N = 650] = 3.68, p = 0.055). Most sports medicine surgeons brace patients for up to 6 weeks following MPFLr. Bracing protocols are widely variable, and current studies exhibit marked heterogeneity in reporting of postoperative outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the optimal postoperative rehabilitation protocol, including the use of a hinged knee brace, following MPFLr.

MPFL重建后的膝关节支撑:方案和术后结果的系统回顾。
内侧髌股韧带重建术(MPFLr)是治疗复发性髌骨不稳最常见的手术。虽然MPFLr的好处是公认的,但在目前的文献中,术后支具方案仍然高度可变且特征不明确。本研究的目的是评估运动医学外科医生在强韧带重建患者中使用支具的情况。方法:通过EMBASE (Elsevier)、Medline (OVID)和SportDiscus with Full Text (EBSCOHost)这三个数据库,对经MPFL重建治疗髌骨不稳的随机对照试验、前瞻性和回顾性研究进行了分析。使用已建立的偏倚风险工具评估研究质量;一些研究表明,由于干预组的非随机选择和康复的可变性,存在中等偏倚风险。收集的数据包括功能结果和再脱位或半脱位的发生率。结果:在521项研究中,112项重复被删除。我们回顾了409篇研究的摘要,其中348篇因相关性而被排除。61项研究的全文综述得出7项符合纳入标准,均包括术后康复方案。5项研究(71.4%)在术后使用了膝关节支架,2项研究(28.6%)将术后支架与不使用支架进行了比较。4项研究(57.1%)报告使用了铰链式膝关节支架,2项研究(28.6%)使用了膝关节固定器。7项研究中有6项(85.7%)在术后长达6周的时间内对患者进行支撑。6项研究(85.7%)报告了术后不稳定事件,共涉及650个膝关节。533个膝关节使用了支架,其中25个(4.7%)经历了至少一次不稳定事件,而117个未使用支架的膝关节中只有1个(0.9%)。不稳定事件组间比较差异无统计学意义(X²(1,N = 650) = 3.68, p = 0.055)。结论:大多数运动医学外科医生在MPFL重建后对患者进行长达6周的支撑。支具方案变化很大,目前的研究在报告术后结果方面表现出明显的异质性。需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的术后康复方案,包括在MPFL重建后使用铰链膝关节支架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书