Staff experience of Open Dialogue (OD) training in planned, acute and urgent care services in a mental health NHS Trust: a thematic analysis.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-07 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2026.2695022
Eleanor Springham, Andrea Garcia Llorens, Laura Smith, Jon Crossley
{"title":"Staff experience of Open Dialogue (OD) training in planned, acute and urgent care services in a mental health NHS Trust: a thematic analysis.","authors":"Eleanor Springham, Andrea Garcia Llorens, Laura Smith, Jon Crossley","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2026.2695022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open Dialogue (OD) is a social network-based, integrative approach to mental health care that encourages shared understanding between service users, their significant others, and professionals.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to explore staff experience of OD training delivered across services in planned, acute and urgent care, providing a multi-team approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focus groups were conducted with seventeen staff members across two time points: three months into training, and three months post-training. A thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four superordinate themes, each containing multiple subthemes, were identified across the data set: current practice versus paradigm shift, commitment of training, friction in experiential learning, and shifting power.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trainees offered mixed evaluations of the training in relation to its practical and experiential elements, with considerable value being found in the multi-team approach. The findings suggest a range of clinical, organisational, and personal benefits of OD training for members of staff through; renegotiating power dynamics, improving working relationships and continuity of care, and enhancing personal reflection and development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"613-621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2695022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Open Dialogue (OD) is a social network-based, integrative approach to mental health care that encourages shared understanding between service users, their significant others, and professionals.

Aims: This study aimed to explore staff experience of OD training delivered across services in planned, acute and urgent care, providing a multi-team approach.

Methods: Focus groups were conducted with seventeen staff members across two time points: three months into training, and three months post-training. A thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed data.

Results: Four superordinate themes, each containing multiple subthemes, were identified across the data set: current practice versus paradigm shift, commitment of training, friction in experiential learning, and shifting power.

Conclusions: Trainees offered mixed evaluations of the training in relation to its practical and experiential elements, with considerable value being found in the multi-team approach. The findings suggest a range of clinical, organisational, and personal benefits of OD training for members of staff through; renegotiating power dynamics, improving working relationships and continuity of care, and enhancing personal reflection and development.

工作人员在国民保健制度精神卫生信托基金计划、急症和紧急护理服务方面的公开对话培训经验:专题分析。
背景:开放式对话(OD)是一种基于社会网络的精神卫生保健综合方法,鼓励服务使用者、他们的重要他人和专业人员之间的共同理解。目的:本研究旨在探讨员工在计划、急性和紧急护理服务中进行OD培训的经验,提供一个多团队的方法。方法:17名工作人员在培训前3个月和培训后3个月两个时间点进行了焦点小组讨论。对转录的数据进行了专题分析。结果:在数据集中确定了四个上级主题,每个主题包含多个子主题:当前实践与范式转换、培训承诺、体验式学习中的摩擦和转移力。结论:受训者对培训的实践和经验因素提供了混合评价,在多团队方法中发现了相当大的价值。研究结果表明,通过以下方式对工作人员进行OD培训可以带来一系列临床、组织和个人利益;重新谈判权力动态,改善工作关系和护理的连续性,加强个人反思和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书