Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Hyperkalemia Management Under Cardio-Kidney-Protective Therapy: A Three-Stakeholder Cross-Sectional Survey.

Q3 Medicine
Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-29 DOI:10.5049/EBP.2026.24.e9
Yongjin Yi, Seon Ha Baek, Jeonghwan Lee, Sejoong Kim
{"title":"Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Hyperkalemia Management Under Cardio-Kidney-Protective Therapy: A Three-Stakeholder Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Yongjin Yi, Seon Ha Baek, Jeonghwan Lee, Sejoong Kim","doi":"10.5049/EBP.2026.24.e9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintaining renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy in patients with hyperkalemia is now favored by contemporary guidelines, yet the perspectives of patients and clinicians on this shift have rarely been examined in parallel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted three parallel descriptive cross-sectional surveys in Korea between April and May 2026: a patient survey distributed through a kidney-disease patient community; a nephrologist survey; and a multispecialty physician survey. Patients, nephrology specialists, and multispecialty physicians were analyzed separately and in a combined nephrologist-versus-non-nephrologist comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 125 patients, 82 nephrologists, and 255 multispecialty physicians completed the survey. Patient awareness of hyperkalemia was high (perceived risk, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 3.84-4.10). More patients preferred potassium-lowering medication (68.8%) over strict dietary control (31.2%) for hyperkalemia management. Clinicians rated maintenance of RASi and MRA as 3.81 (3.72-3.90) and 3.47 (3.37-3.56), respectively; nephrologists rated maintenance as more important than non-nephrologists for both classes (p <i><</i> 0.001 for RASi, p = 0.006 for MRA). For long-term outpatient hyperkalemia, nephrologists most often endorsed prescribing a potassium binder (68.2%), while non-nephrologists most often endorsed reducing or discontinuing the culprit drugs (55.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients preferred to maintain cardio-kidney-protective therapy. A specialty gap in this preference was observed between nephrologists and non-nephrology clinicians, indicating a need to broaden clinician awareness of the full spectrum of hyperkalemia management options, including the more active use of potassium-lowering agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":35352,"journal":{"name":"Electrolyte and Blood Pressure","volume":"24 2","pages":"129-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13338643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrolyte and Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5049/EBP.2026.24.e9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maintaining renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy in patients with hyperkalemia is now favored by contemporary guidelines, yet the perspectives of patients and clinicians on this shift have rarely been examined in parallel.

Methods: We conducted three parallel descriptive cross-sectional surveys in Korea between April and May 2026: a patient survey distributed through a kidney-disease patient community; a nephrologist survey; and a multispecialty physician survey. Patients, nephrology specialists, and multispecialty physicians were analyzed separately and in a combined nephrologist-versus-non-nephrologist comparison.

Results: A total of 125 patients, 82 nephrologists, and 255 multispecialty physicians completed the survey. Patient awareness of hyperkalemia was high (perceived risk, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 3.84-4.10). More patients preferred potassium-lowering medication (68.8%) over strict dietary control (31.2%) for hyperkalemia management. Clinicians rated maintenance of RASi and MRA as 3.81 (3.72-3.90) and 3.47 (3.37-3.56), respectively; nephrologists rated maintenance as more important than non-nephrologists for both classes (p < 0.001 for RASi, p = 0.006 for MRA). For long-term outpatient hyperkalemia, nephrologists most often endorsed prescribing a potassium binder (68.2%), while non-nephrologists most often endorsed reducing or discontinuing the culprit drugs (55.5%).

Conclusion: Patients preferred to maintain cardio-kidney-protective therapy. A specialty gap in this preference was observed between nephrologists and non-nephrology clinicians, indicating a need to broaden clinician awareness of the full spectrum of hyperkalemia management options, including the more active use of potassium-lowering agents.

心肾保护治疗下高钾血症管理的患者和临床观点:一项三利益相关者横断面调查。
背景:在高钾血症患者中维持肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)和矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)治疗现在受到当代指南的支持,然而患者和临床医生对这一转变的观点很少被并行检查。方法:我们于2026年4月至5月在韩国进行了三次平行描述性横断面调查:通过肾脏疾病患者社区进行患者调查;肾脏病专家调查;以及多专业医师调查。患者、肾病专家和多专业医生分别进行分析,并进行肾病专家与非肾病专家的联合比较。结果:共有125名患者、82名肾病专家和255名多专科医生完成了调查。患者对高钾血症的知晓率较高(感知风险,3.97;95%可信区间,3.84-4.10)。对于高钾血症的治疗,更多的患者选择降钾药物(68.8%)而不是严格控制饮食(31.2%)。临床医生对RASi和MRA维持的评分分别为3.81(3.72-3.90)和3.47 (3.37-3.56);对于这两类患者,肾科医生比非肾科医生更重视维持(RASi为p 0.001, MRA为p = 0.006)。对于长期门诊高钾血症,肾病科医生通常支持开钾结合剂(68.2%),而非肾病科医生通常支持减少或停用罪魁祸首药物(55.5%)。结论:患者倾向于维持心肾保护治疗。在肾科医生和非肾科临床医生之间观察到这种偏好的专业差距,表明需要扩大临床医生对高钾血症管理选择的全谱认识,包括更积极地使用降钾药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electrolyte and Blood Pressure
Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书