Superior cancer detection with transperineal biopsy in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level and a PI-RADS score of 3-4: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Letters Pub Date : 2026-06-25 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.3892/ol.2026.15729
Jun Zhang, Hui Zheng
{"title":"Superior cancer detection with transperineal biopsy in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level and a PI-RADS score of 3-4: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jun Zhang, Hui Zheng","doi":"10.3892/ol.2026.15729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The early and accurate detection of prostate cancer remains pivotal for improving clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to compare the cancer detection rates (CDRs) and safety profiles of transperineal (TP) vs. transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy techniques in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and magnetic resonance imaging findings suggestive of malignancy (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 or 4). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 127 patients who underwent TP (n=65) or TR (n=62) prostate biopsies between May 2022 and August 2024. CDR, adverse events and laboratory findings were compared between the groups. The TP approach yielded a significantly higher CDR (55.38%) than the TR approach (27.42%) (P=0.001), with no increase in adverse events, such as fever, infection or rectal bleeding. Routine lab values, including those for PSA and free PSA, showed no significant differences. In conclusion, in the present retrospective single-center cohort, the TP protocol used was associated with a higher cancer detection rate than the TR protocol, without an increased rate of adverse events. Given the non-randomized design and protocol differences between groups, these findings should be interpreted with caution and warrant confirmation in prospective multicenter studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19503,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Letters","volume":"32 2","pages":"375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13339007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2026.15729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The early and accurate detection of prostate cancer remains pivotal for improving clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to compare the cancer detection rates (CDRs) and safety profiles of transperineal (TP) vs. transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy techniques in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and magnetic resonance imaging findings suggestive of malignancy (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 or 4). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 127 patients who underwent TP (n=65) or TR (n=62) prostate biopsies between May 2022 and August 2024. CDR, adverse events and laboratory findings were compared between the groups. The TP approach yielded a significantly higher CDR (55.38%) than the TR approach (27.42%) (P=0.001), with no increase in adverse events, such as fever, infection or rectal bleeding. Routine lab values, including those for PSA and free PSA, showed no significant differences. In conclusion, in the present retrospective single-center cohort, the TP protocol used was associated with a higher cancer detection rate than the TR protocol, without an increased rate of adverse events. Given the non-randomized design and protocol differences between groups, these findings should be interpreted with caution and warrant confirmation in prospective multicenter studies.

前列腺特异性抗原水平升高且PI-RADS评分为3-4的患者,经会阴活检能更好地检测癌症:一项回顾性队列研究
前列腺癌的早期和准确检测仍然是改善临床结果的关键。本研究旨在比较经会阴(TP)与经直肠(TR)前列腺活检技术在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平升高和磁共振成像结果提示恶性肿瘤患者中的癌症检出率(CDRs)和安全性(前列腺成像报告和数据系统评分为3或4)。对2022年5月至2024年8月期间接受TP (n=65)或TR (n=62)前列腺活检的127例患者进行了回顾性队列研究。比较两组间的CDR、不良事件和实验室结果。TP入路的CDR(55.38%)明显高于TR入路(27.42%)(P=0.001),而发热、感染、直肠出血等不良事件未增加。常规实验室值,包括PSA和游离PSA,没有显着差异。总之,在本回顾性单中心队列研究中,TP方案比TR方案具有更高的癌症检出率,但没有增加不良事件发生率。考虑到组间的非随机设计和方案差异,这些发现应谨慎解释,并在前瞻性多中心研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology Letters
Oncology Letters ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Letters is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online, that focuses on all aspects of clinical oncology, as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental model systems relevant to the mechanisms of disease. The principal aim of Oncology Letters is to provide the prompt publication of original studies of high quality that pertain to clinical oncology, chemotherapy, oncogenes, carcinogenesis, metastasis, epidemiology and viral oncology in the form of original research, reviews and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书