{"title":"Implementing the Safer Anaesthesia From Education Paediatrics Course in Japan: Contextual Adaptation and Early National Dissemination.","authors":"Yuki Fujimoto, Norifumi Kuratani","doi":"10.1002/pan.70262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, declining birth rates and concentration of pediatric cases in fewer high-volume children's hospitals have reduced anesthesiologists' opportunities, particularly during training, to gain experience in pediatric anesthesia. There is no standardized national curriculum, and training relies largely on workplace-based learning. The Safer Anaesthesia From Education (SAFE) Paediatrics Course is a structured program originally developed for low- and middle-income countries; whether it can be contextually adapted and disseminated in a high-income country facing different training challenges has not been established.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe the translation, contextual adaptation, early implementation, and initial national dissemination of the SAFE Paediatrics Course in Japan, including preliminary educational outcomes from a single-center resident training program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-phase descriptive educational project. Phase 1 comprised course translation, contextual adaptation, pilot testing of a multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination, and pilot delivery. Phase 2 comprised single-center implementation and evaluation at Saitama Children's Medical Center among anesthesia residents (October 2021-March 2023). Participants completed pre- and post-course MCQ tests and confidence ratings; a post-course survey assessed satisfaction. National dissemination was described using aggregated course-level data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty residents participated in the single-center evaluation. MCQ scores increased from 37.87 to 41.67 out of 50 (mean increase 3.80; 95% CI: 2.64-4.96; p < 0.001), and self-rated confidence increased. Satisfaction was high (17/20 respondents rated the course 4 or 5). Between October 2021 and January 2026, 28 courses were delivered across four geographical areas and national meeting-affiliated sessions, accounting for 359 participant attendances; many used condensed one-day or half-day formats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SAFE Paediatrics Course was translated, contextually adapted, and implemented in Japan, with early dissemination across multiple geographical areas and flexible delivery formats. Preliminary single-center outcomes support its suitability as a structured pediatric anesthesia educational program in this setting. Further multicenter and longitudinal evaluation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"1266-1273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13551184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan.70262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In Japan, declining birth rates and concentration of pediatric cases in fewer high-volume children's hospitals have reduced anesthesiologists' opportunities, particularly during training, to gain experience in pediatric anesthesia. There is no standardized national curriculum, and training relies largely on workplace-based learning. The Safer Anaesthesia From Education (SAFE) Paediatrics Course is a structured program originally developed for low- and middle-income countries; whether it can be contextually adapted and disseminated in a high-income country facing different training challenges has not been established.
Aims: To describe the translation, contextual adaptation, early implementation, and initial national dissemination of the SAFE Paediatrics Course in Japan, including preliminary educational outcomes from a single-center resident training program.
Methods: We conducted a two-phase descriptive educational project. Phase 1 comprised course translation, contextual adaptation, pilot testing of a multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination, and pilot delivery. Phase 2 comprised single-center implementation and evaluation at Saitama Children's Medical Center among anesthesia residents (October 2021-March 2023). Participants completed pre- and post-course MCQ tests and confidence ratings; a post-course survey assessed satisfaction. National dissemination was described using aggregated course-level data.
Results: Thirty residents participated in the single-center evaluation. MCQ scores increased from 37.87 to 41.67 out of 50 (mean increase 3.80; 95% CI: 2.64-4.96; p < 0.001), and self-rated confidence increased. Satisfaction was high (17/20 respondents rated the course 4 or 5). Between October 2021 and January 2026, 28 courses were delivered across four geographical areas and national meeting-affiliated sessions, accounting for 359 participant attendances; many used condensed one-day or half-day formats.
Conclusions: The SAFE Paediatrics Course was translated, contextually adapted, and implemented in Japan, with early dissemination across multiple geographical areas and flexible delivery formats. Preliminary single-center outcomes support its suitability as a structured pediatric anesthesia educational program in this setting. Further multicenter and longitudinal evaluation is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.