Viscoelastic Tests in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Invasive Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Andrea Boccatonda, Elena Campello, Angela Napolitano, Antonella Bray, Chiara Simion, Carla Serra, Fabio Piscaglia, Luca Spiezia, Paolo Simioni
{"title":"Viscoelastic Tests in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Invasive Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.","authors":"Andrea Boccatonda, Elena Campello, Angela Napolitano, Antonella Bray, Chiara Simion, Carla Serra, Fabio Piscaglia, Luca Spiezia, Paolo Simioni","doi":"10.1111/liv.70782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures is traditionally assessed using conventional coagulation tests, which poorly reflect the rebalanced haemostatic state of cirrhosis and often lead to unnecessary transfusions. Viscoelastic testing (VET) provides a global assessment of coagulation and may enable more rational transfusion strategies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VET-guided transfusion strategies in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus from inception to 10 April 2026. RCTs comparing VET-guided versus standard-of-care transfusion strategies in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures were included. Primary outcome was procedure-related bleeding; secondary outcomes included transfusion requirements. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs including 296 patients were analysed. Procedure-related bleeding was rare and did not differ between groups (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.24-2.31; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). In contrast, VET-guided strategies significantly reduced transfusion requirements, including any blood product transfusion (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.44; I<sup>2</sup> = 56%), platelet transfusion (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.13-0.32; I<sup>2</sup> = 40%), any fresh frozen plasma (FFP) exposure (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.57; I<sup>2</sup> = 63%) and FFP-only transfusion (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.46; I<sup>2</sup> = 81%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VET-guided transfusion strategies significantly reduce blood product utilisation without increasing bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures. These findings support a shift towards a physiology-based approach to haemostasis, with potential benefits for patient safety and resource optimisation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CRD420261382437.</p>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"46 8","pages":"e70782"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.70782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures is traditionally assessed using conventional coagulation tests, which poorly reflect the rebalanced haemostatic state of cirrhosis and often lead to unnecessary transfusions. Viscoelastic testing (VET) provides a global assessment of coagulation and may enable more rational transfusion strategies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VET-guided transfusion strategies in this setting.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus from inception to 10 April 2026. RCTs comparing VET-guided versus standard-of-care transfusion strategies in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures were included. Primary outcome was procedure-related bleeding; secondary outcomes included transfusion requirements. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results: Six RCTs including 296 patients were analysed. Procedure-related bleeding was rare and did not differ between groups (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.24-2.31; I2 = 0%). In contrast, VET-guided strategies significantly reduced transfusion requirements, including any blood product transfusion (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.44; I2 = 56%), platelet transfusion (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.13-0.32; I2 = 40%), any fresh frozen plasma (FFP) exposure (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.57; I2 = 63%) and FFP-only transfusion (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.46; I2 = 81%).

Conclusions: VET-guided transfusion strategies significantly reduce blood product utilisation without increasing bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures. These findings support a shift towards a physiology-based approach to haemostasis, with potential benefits for patient safety and resource optimisation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CRD420261382437.

有创手术中肝硬化患者的粘弹性试验:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:传统上使用常规凝血试验来评估接受有创手术的肝硬化患者的出血风险,这很难反映肝硬化再平衡的止血状态,并经常导致不必要的输血。粘弹性测试(VET)提供了凝血的整体评估,并可能使更合理的输血策略。我们对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估在这种情况下vet引导的输血策略的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Scopus自成立至2026年4月10日。比较vet引导与标准治疗的肝硬化患者接受侵入性手术输血策略的随机对照试验。主要结局为手术相关出血;次要结局包括输血需求。采用Mantel-Haenszel方法合并95%置信区间的风险比(rr)。结果:共分析6项随机对照试验,共296例患者。手术相关出血很少见,两组间无差异(RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.24-2.31; I2 = 0%)。相比之下,vet引导的策略显著减少了输血需求,包括任何血液制品输血(RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.44; I2 = 56%)、血小板输血(RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.13-0.32; I2 = 40%)、任何新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)暴露(RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.57; I2 = 63%)和仅FFP输血(RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.46; I2 = 81%)。结论:在接受有创手术的肝硬化患者中,兽医引导的输血策略显著降低了血液制品的使用,而不会增加出血风险。这些发现支持转向以生理为基础的止血方法,对患者安全和资源优化有潜在的好处。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:CRD420261382437。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liver International
Liver International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
348
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书