PBMC circRNA Profiles Distinguish Atypical From Idiopathic Parkinsonism and Track Clinical Severity Across Syndromes

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Stylianos Ravanidis, Anastasia Bougea, Fedon-Giasin Kattan, Leonidas Stefanis, Epaminondas Doxakis
{"title":"PBMC circRNA Profiles Distinguish Atypical From Idiopathic Parkinsonism and Track Clinical Severity Across Syndromes","authors":"Stylianos Ravanidis,&nbsp;Anastasia Bougea,&nbsp;Fedon-Giasin Kattan,&nbsp;Leonidas Stefanis,&nbsp;Epaminondas Doxakis","doi":"10.1111/jnc.70519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Early separation of atypical Parkinsonian syndromes (APS) from idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD) remains challenging. Given that many brain-biased circular RNAs (circRNAs) are stable and expressed in blood cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) circRNAs were profiled in 140 individuals (iPD 43, MSA 35, PSP 19, healthy controls 43) using RT-qPCR across 46 a priori candidates. Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with FDR correction; clinical associations were examined using Bonferroni-corrected Spearman correlations with a bootstrap stability assessment; and discrimination was assessed using logistic regression with nested repeated cross-validation, calibration analysis, and ROC analysis. Six circRNAs differed across groups after FDR adjustment (SLC8A1_circ_0000994, MAPK9_circ_0001566, MGA_circ_0000591, AGTPBP1_circ_0007162, SFMBT2_circ_0000211, HIPK3_circ_0000284), with median levels lowest in iPD and highest in PSP. Internally cross-validated multi-marker panels achieved AUCs of 0.88 for PSP versus controls, 0.78 for PSP versus iPD, and 0.67 for MSA versus iPD. Several circRNAs, including non-differential ones, showed bootstrap-stable associations with cognitive, mood, working-memory, and praxis measures. ENCORI- and CircInteractome-based analyses placed the differentially expressed circRNAs within a shared RBP interaction landscape and identified modest but significant miRNA-target overlap. Findings indicate that PBMC circRNA patterns aid APS-iPD differentiation and align with clinical impairment within this cohort; external validation, longitudinal assessment, and mechanistic studies are needed to establish diagnostic performance and biological relevance.</p><p>\n \n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":16527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurochemistry","volume":"170 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnc.70519","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnc.70519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early separation of atypical Parkinsonian syndromes (APS) from idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD) remains challenging. Given that many brain-biased circular RNAs (circRNAs) are stable and expressed in blood cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) circRNAs were profiled in 140 individuals (iPD 43, MSA 35, PSP 19, healthy controls 43) using RT-qPCR across 46 a priori candidates. Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with FDR correction; clinical associations were examined using Bonferroni-corrected Spearman correlations with a bootstrap stability assessment; and discrimination was assessed using logistic regression with nested repeated cross-validation, calibration analysis, and ROC analysis. Six circRNAs differed across groups after FDR adjustment (SLC8A1_circ_0000994, MAPK9_circ_0001566, MGA_circ_0000591, AGTPBP1_circ_0007162, SFMBT2_circ_0000211, HIPK3_circ_0000284), with median levels lowest in iPD and highest in PSP. Internally cross-validated multi-marker panels achieved AUCs of 0.88 for PSP versus controls, 0.78 for PSP versus iPD, and 0.67 for MSA versus iPD. Several circRNAs, including non-differential ones, showed bootstrap-stable associations with cognitive, mood, working-memory, and praxis measures. ENCORI- and CircInteractome-based analyses placed the differentially expressed circRNAs within a shared RBP interaction landscape and identified modest but significant miRNA-target overlap. Findings indicate that PBMC circRNA patterns aid APS-iPD differentiation and align with clinical impairment within this cohort; external validation, longitudinal assessment, and mechanistic studies are needed to establish diagnostic performance and biological relevance.

Abstract Image

PBMC circRNA谱区分非典型和特发性帕金森病,并追踪不同综合征的临床严重程度。
早期分离非典型帕金森综合征(APS)和特发性帕金森病(iPD)仍然具有挑战性。考虑到许多脑偏环状rna (circRNAs)在血细胞中是稳定表达的,我们利用RT-qPCR分析了140个个体(iPD 43, MSA 35, PSP 19,健康对照43)的外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)环状rna。组间差异分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,FDR校正;使用bonferroni校正的Spearman相关性和自举稳定性评估来检验临床关联;采用逻辑回归、嵌套重复交叉验证、校准分析和ROC分析来评估辨别性。在FDR调整后,6种circrna在各组之间存在差异(SLC8A1_circ_0000994, MAPK9_circ_0001566, MGA_circ_0000591, AGTPBP1_circ_0007162, SFMBT2_circ_0000211, HIPK3_circ_0000284), iPD的中位水平最低,PSP的中位水平最高。内部交叉验证的多标记面板PSP与对照组的auc为0.88,PSP与iPD的auc为0.78,MSA与iPD的auc为0.67。一些环状rna,包括非差异环状rna,显示出与认知、情绪、工作记忆和实践测量的自启动稳定关联。基于ENCORI和circinteracome的分析将差异表达的circrna置于共享的RBP相互作用景观中,并确定了适度但显著的mirna -靶点重叠。研究结果表明,PBMC circRNA模式有助于APS-iPD分化,并与该队列中的临床损伤相一致;需要外部验证、纵向评估和机制研究来建立诊断性能和生物学相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurochemistry
Journal of Neurochemistry 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurochemistry focuses on molecular, cellular and biochemical aspects of the nervous system, the pathogenesis of neurological disorders and the development of disease specific biomarkers. It is devoted to the prompt publication of original findings of the highest scientific priority and value that provide novel mechanistic insights, represent a clear advance over previous studies and have the potential to generate exciting future research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书