Transportability of tislelizumab trial outcomes from RATIONALE-315, RATIONALE-303, and RATIONALE-312 to the European population in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), advanced NSCLC and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).
{"title":"Transportability of tislelizumab trial outcomes from RATIONALE-315, RATIONALE-303, and RATIONALE-312 to the European population in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), advanced NSCLC and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).","authors":"Francesco Passiglia, Eugenia Priedane, Silvy Mardiguian, Mariana Farraia, Anuja Pandey, Pragya Shukla, Caroline von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Simone Rivolo, Ariadna Mendoza-Naranjo, Shiangjiin Leaw, Kirsha Naicker, Yu Wang, Xiao Lin, Venediktos Kapetanakis","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2026.2696934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tislelizumab was evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (RATIONALE-315, RATIONALE-303) and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) (RATIONALE-312), primarily in Asian populations. We assessed the transportability of clinical findings from these RCTs to European patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Targeted literature reviews (TLRs) identified real world-evidence (RWE), RCTs, and treatment effect modifiers in perioperative NSCLC, second-line or later (2L+) NSCLC, and first-line (1L) ES-SCLC. Relevant RWE studies were selected to define the target European-like populations. Outcome regression models used RATIONALE individual patient data to predict relative treatment effect of tislelizumab vs. comparators in European populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Event-free survival (HR 0.56), major pathological response (OR 7.49) and pathological complete response (OR 11.54) from RATIONALE-315 were similar to those predicted for the base case European target perioperative NSCLC population (EFS HR 0.57; MPR OR 3.39; PCR OR 8.95). Predicted overall survival and progression-free survival for 2L+ NSCLC and for 1L ES-SCLC were similar to RATIONALE-303 and RATIONALE-312, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of tislelizumab observed in the RATIONALE trials explored in this analysis is transportable, subject to the specified assumptions, to European patients in the setting of perioperative NSCLC, 2L+ NSCLC, and 1L ES-SCLC, consistently favoring tislelizumab over control.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2143-2154"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2026.2696934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tislelizumab was evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (RATIONALE-315, RATIONALE-303) and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) (RATIONALE-312), primarily in Asian populations. We assessed the transportability of clinical findings from these RCTs to European patients.
Methods: Targeted literature reviews (TLRs) identified real world-evidence (RWE), RCTs, and treatment effect modifiers in perioperative NSCLC, second-line or later (2L+) NSCLC, and first-line (1L) ES-SCLC. Relevant RWE studies were selected to define the target European-like populations. Outcome regression models used RATIONALE individual patient data to predict relative treatment effect of tislelizumab vs. comparators in European populations.
Results: Event-free survival (HR 0.56), major pathological response (OR 7.49) and pathological complete response (OR 11.54) from RATIONALE-315 were similar to those predicted for the base case European target perioperative NSCLC population (EFS HR 0.57; MPR OR 3.39; PCR OR 8.95). Predicted overall survival and progression-free survival for 2L+ NSCLC and for 1L ES-SCLC were similar to RATIONALE-303 and RATIONALE-312, respectively.
Conclusion: The efficacy of tislelizumab observed in the RATIONALE trials explored in this analysis is transportable, subject to the specified assumptions, to European patients in the setting of perioperative NSCLC, 2L+ NSCLC, and 1L ES-SCLC, consistently favoring tislelizumab over control.
期刊介绍:
Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community.
The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.