Interdisciplinary strategies to reduce surgical site infections in operating rooms: a scoping review.

IF 2.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dominique Joubert, Sylvain Boloré, Carelle Baroni, Anne-Sophie Hans, Selin Kivrak, Audrey Ringot, Claude Dussart
{"title":"Interdisciplinary strategies to reduce surgical site infections in operating rooms: a scoping review.","authors":"Dominique Joubert, Sylvain Boloré, Carelle Baroni, Anne-Sophie Hans, Selin Kivrak, Audrey Ringot, Claude Dussart","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most frequent healthcare-associated infections, causing major morbidity, mortality and costs. In Switzerland, SSIs represent up to 30% of hospital-acquired infections, yet adherence to prevention measures remains suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map research on interdisciplinary strategies for SSI prevention and assess their impact on adherence and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library (2016-2026), plus manual searches. English and French studies included.</p><p><strong>Eligibility: </strong>Using the Participants-Concept-Context framework: surgical teams with ≥3 professional groups (participants), interdisciplinary strategies targeting SSI prevention (concept), adult surgical procedures in the OR (context). Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and cross-sectional designs were eligible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were charted using a WHO-informed tool. Five reviewers appraised studies with Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Results synthesised narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2058 records, 22 studies were included across 9 countries and 8 specialties, mostly high-income settings. Bundled interventions were associated with improved adherence and reductions in SSI rates of up to 50%. Success depended on leadership, collaboration, audit-feedback and contextual adaptation. No study reported coordination triggers or nursing frameworks; patient involvement was mainly informational.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interdisciplinary bundles improve adherence and reduce SSI rates but show variable effectiveness. No defined model ensures consistent gains. Future research should integrate synchronisation mechanisms, triggers and structured task-sharing to strengthen sustainability and impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13343033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-004018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most frequent healthcare-associated infections, causing major morbidity, mortality and costs. In Switzerland, SSIs represent up to 30% of hospital-acquired infections, yet adherence to prevention measures remains suboptimal.

Objective: To map research on interdisciplinary strategies for SSI prevention and assess their impact on adherence and outcomes.

Design: Scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.

Data sources: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library (2016-2026), plus manual searches. English and French studies included.

Eligibility: Using the Participants-Concept-Context framework: surgical teams with ≥3 professional groups (participants), interdisciplinary strategies targeting SSI prevention (concept), adult surgical procedures in the OR (context). Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and cross-sectional designs were eligible.

Methods: Data were charted using a WHO-informed tool. Five reviewers appraised studies with Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Results synthesised narratively.

Results: From 2058 records, 22 studies were included across 9 countries and 8 specialties, mostly high-income settings. Bundled interventions were associated with improved adherence and reductions in SSI rates of up to 50%. Success depended on leadership, collaboration, audit-feedback and contextual adaptation. No study reported coordination triggers or nursing frameworks; patient involvement was mainly informational.

Conclusions: Interdisciplinary bundles improve adherence and reduce SSI rates but show variable effectiveness. No defined model ensures consistent gains. Future research should integrate synchronisation mechanisms, triggers and structured task-sharing to strengthen sustainability and impact.

减少手术室手术部位感染的跨学科策略:范围综述。
手术部位感染(ssi)是最常见的卫生保健相关感染之一,导致主要的发病率、死亡率和成本。在瑞士,ssi占医院获得性感染的30%,但对预防措施的依从性仍然不够理想。目的:绘制跨学科预防SSI策略的研究图谱,并评估其对依从性和结果的影响。设计:范围审查遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法和首选报告项目的系统审查和范围审查的元分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)指南。数据来源:CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE和Cochrane Library(2016-2026),外加人工搜索。包括英语和法语。资格:使用参与者-概念-背景框架:具有≥3个专业小组(参与者)的外科团队,针对SSI预防的跨学科策略(概念),手术室中的成人外科手术(背景)。实验、准实验、观察和横断面设计均符合要求。方法:使用世卫组织信息工具绘制数据图表。五名审稿人用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的清单对研究进行了评估。综合叙述的结果。结果:从2058份记录中,包括9个国家和8个专业的22项研究,主要是高收入环境。捆绑干预与提高依从性和降低SSI发生率高达50%相关。成功取决于领导力、协作、审计反馈和情境适应。没有研究报告协调触发或护理框架;患者参与主要是信息性的。结论:跨学科捆绑治疗提高了依从性,降低了SSI发生率,但效果不一。没有定义的模型可以确保一致的收益。未来的研究应整合同步机制、触发机制和结构化任务共享,以增强可持续性和影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书