Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Newly Diagnosed Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mingyue He, Kevin F Erickson, Hania Kassem, Maria E Montez-Rath, Tara I Chang, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Jingbo Niu
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Newly Diagnosed Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Mingyue He, Kevin F Erickson, Hania Kassem, Maria E Montez-Rath, Tara I Chang, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Jingbo Niu","doi":"10.1159/000553428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Apixaban reduces thromboembolic events, bleeding, and mortality compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, evidence in patients with kidney failure (KF) receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of apixaban versus warfarin in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the US Renal Data System, we identified Medicare beneficiaries on PD with newly diagnosed NVAF (2014-2019) who had no prior oral anticoagulation (OAC) use. We included patients initiating apixaban or warfarin within 30 days after NVAF diagnosis. After propensity matching, we estimated the hazard ratios for thromboembolic events, bleeding events, and mortality using Cox models accounting for competing risks, where applicable, and using both intent-to-treat and as-treated (AT) approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6,571 OAC-naive PD patients with newly diagnosed NVAF, 334 initiated apixaban and 717 initiated warfarin within 30 days. After 1:1 propensity matching, all observed characteristics of 330 apixaban and 330 warfarin users were balanced. The median CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 4 (IQR 3-5). In intent-to-treat analyses, hazards of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.42-2.01) and the composite of other thromboembolic outcomes with cardiovascular death (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.66-1.22) did not differ between groups. The hazards of clinically important bleeding (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.62-1.07), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality also did not differ between groups. Findings were consistent in AT analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among PD patients with newly diagnosed NVAF, we observed no statistically significant differences between apixaban and warfarin for effectiveness or bleeding outcomes. Given the challenges of warfarin management in KF, apixaban may represent a more practical option when anticoagulation is pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13474193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000553428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Apixaban reduces thromboembolic events, bleeding, and mortality compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, evidence in patients with kidney failure (KF) receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of apixaban versus warfarin in this population.

Methods: Using the US Renal Data System, we identified Medicare beneficiaries on PD with newly diagnosed NVAF (2014-2019) who had no prior oral anticoagulation (OAC) use. We included patients initiating apixaban or warfarin within 30 days after NVAF diagnosis. After propensity matching, we estimated the hazard ratios for thromboembolic events, bleeding events, and mortality using Cox models accounting for competing risks, where applicable, and using both intent-to-treat and as-treated (AT) approaches.

Results: Among 6,571 OAC-naive PD patients with newly diagnosed NVAF, 334 initiated apixaban and 717 initiated warfarin within 30 days. After 1:1 propensity matching, all observed characteristics of 330 apixaban and 330 warfarin users were balanced. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 (IQR 3-5). In intent-to-treat analyses, hazards of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.42-2.01) and the composite of other thromboembolic outcomes with cardiovascular death (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.66-1.22) did not differ between groups. The hazards of clinically important bleeding (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.62-1.07), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality also did not differ between groups. Findings were consistent in AT analyses.

Conclusion: Among PD patients with newly diagnosed NVAF, we observed no statistically significant differences between apixaban and warfarin for effectiveness or bleeding outcomes. Given the challenges of warfarin management in KF, apixaban may represent a more practical option when anticoagulation is pursued.

阿哌沙班与华法林在腹膜透析患者新诊断的非瓣膜性心房颤动中的安全性和有效性。
与华法林相比,阿哌沙班可减少非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的血栓栓塞事件、出血和死亡率。然而,肾衰竭(KF)患者接受腹膜透析(PD)的证据有限。我们评估了阿哌沙班与华法林在该人群中的安全性和有效性。方法:使用美国肾脏数据系统,我们确定了2014-2019年新诊断的非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)的PD医疗保险受益人,他们之前没有使用过口服抗凝剂(OAC)。我们纳入了非瓣膜性房颤诊断后30天内开始使用阿哌沙班或华法林的患者。倾向匹配后,我们使用Cox模型估计血栓栓塞事件、出血事件和死亡率的风险比,考虑竞争风险,在适用的情况下,使用意向治疗和已治疗方法。结果6571例OAC-naive PD新诊断NVAF患者中,334例在30天内开始使用阿哌沙班,717例在30天内开始使用华法林。经过1:1的倾向匹配,330名阿哌沙班和330名华法林使用者的所有观察特征都是平衡的。CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分中位数为4 (IQR 3-5)。在意向治疗分析中,缺血性卒中的危险(HR=0.92; 95%CI, 0.42-2.01)和其他血栓栓塞结局与心血管死亡的组合(HR=0.90; 95%CI, 0.66-1.22)在两组之间没有差异。临床重要出血(HR=0.81; 95%CI, 0.62-1.07)、大出血、颅内出血和全因死亡率的危险在两组之间也没有差异。经治疗的分析结果一致。在新诊断为非瓣膜性房颤的PD患者中,我们观察到阿哌沙班与华法林在有效性或出血结局方面无统计学差异。考虑到华法林治疗KF的挑战,阿哌沙班在抗凝治疗中可能是一个更实用的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书