L26/P-473 Lactobacillus-containing probiotics may enhance pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
D. Hiratsuka, Y. Hirota
{"title":"L26/P-473 Lactobacillus-containing probiotics may enhance pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"D. Hiratsuka, Y. Hirota","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deag083.806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study question In infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART), does Lactobacillus-containing probiotic supplementation improve clinical pregnancy rates versus placebo or no treatment? Summary answer Lactobacillus-containing probiotics were associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.49), with stronger effects when administered for >14 days (RR 1.99). What is known already Despite advances in ART, a subset of patients continues to experience implantation failure, and uterine/endometrial factors remain difficult to modify once embryo quality is optimised. Emerging evidence links endometrial microbiota composition to implantation, with non-Lactobacillus-dominant profiles more frequently observed in infertile women and associated with poorer reproductive outcomes; however, trials of Lactobacillus-containing probiotics in ART have shown inconsistent results, potentially due to heterogeneity in patient selection, probiotic strains, administration routes, and treatment duration. Study design, size, duration Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251149619). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov (January 2005–October 2025; English). The primary analysis synthesized randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in infertile women undergoing ART comparing Lactobacillus-containing probiotics with placebo/no treatment for clinical pregnancy. A secondary exploratory analysis pooled observational 16S rRNA studies assessing conversion to Lactobacillus-dominant endometrial microbiota. Participants/materials, setting, methods Infertile women undergoing ART were included. Lactobacillus-containing probiotics (vaginal/oral) were compared with placebo or no treatment. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB 2; ROBINS-I). Random-effects models pooled risk ratios for clinical pregnancy, with a prespecified subgroup by treatment duration (>14 vs ≤ 14 days). Exploratory observational data were synthesized by pooling the proportion of women converting from non-Lactobacillus-dominant to Lactobacillus-dominant endometrial microbiota (defined as ≥ 90% Lactobacillus spp.). Main results and the role of chance Of 517 records screened, seven RCTs (n = 796; probiotics 399, control 397; published 2023–2025) were included. Lactobacillus-containing probiotics were associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates (41.98% vs 28.25%; RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.07–2.07; I²=29%). Effects were stronger with >14 days of treatment (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.44–2.75; I²=0%) than with ≤14 days (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.67–2.00). No adverse events were reported in the included trials, although adverse-event reporting was limited. RoB 2 judged no trial at high overall risk, but several had some concerns, mainly due to unclear blinding/allocation reporting; funnel plot inspection did not suggest marked asymmetry (Egger’s test not feasible). Exploratory synthesis of three observational studies (n = 67) found that 79% of infertile women with non-Lactobacillus-dominant endometrial microbiota converted to Lactobacillus-dominant status after probiotic treatment (pooled proportion 0.79, 95% CI 0.67–0.87; I²=0%), although ROBINS-I indicated moderate/high risk of bias. Limitations, reasons for caution Eligible RCTs were few, and live birth was rarely reported. Definitions of clinical pregnancy may vary across studies. Several trials had blinding/reporting limitations, and the microbiota endpoint relied on observational designs vulnerable to confounding and selection bias; therefore, mechanistic inferences should be cautious. Wider implications of the findings Lactobacillus-containing probiotics may be a noninvasive adjunct to improve ART outcomes, particularly with treatment beyond 2 weeks and in women with non-Lactobacillus-dominant endometrial microbiota. Future multicentre RCTs should standardise strains/doses/routes, incorporate baseline microbiota stratification, and evaluate live birth and safety with adequate power. Trial registration number Yes","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deag083.806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question In infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART), does Lactobacillus-containing probiotic supplementation improve clinical pregnancy rates versus placebo or no treatment? Summary answer Lactobacillus-containing probiotics were associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.49), with stronger effects when administered for >14 days (RR 1.99). What is known already Despite advances in ART, a subset of patients continues to experience implantation failure, and uterine/endometrial factors remain difficult to modify once embryo quality is optimised. Emerging evidence links endometrial microbiota composition to implantation, with non-Lactobacillus-dominant profiles more frequently observed in infertile women and associated with poorer reproductive outcomes; however, trials of Lactobacillus-containing probiotics in ART have shown inconsistent results, potentially due to heterogeneity in patient selection, probiotic strains, administration routes, and treatment duration. Study design, size, duration Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251149619). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov (January 2005–October 2025; English). The primary analysis synthesized randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in infertile women undergoing ART comparing Lactobacillus-containing probiotics with placebo/no treatment for clinical pregnancy. A secondary exploratory analysis pooled observational 16S rRNA studies assessing conversion to Lactobacillus-dominant endometrial microbiota. Participants/materials, setting, methods Infertile women undergoing ART were included. Lactobacillus-containing probiotics (vaginal/oral) were compared with placebo or no treatment. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB 2; ROBINS-I). Random-effects models pooled risk ratios for clinical pregnancy, with a prespecified subgroup by treatment duration (>14 vs ≤ 14 days). Exploratory observational data were synthesized by pooling the proportion of women converting from non-Lactobacillus-dominant to Lactobacillus-dominant endometrial microbiota (defined as ≥ 90% Lactobacillus spp.). Main results and the role of chance Of 517 records screened, seven RCTs (n = 796; probiotics 399, control 397; published 2023–2025) were included. Lactobacillus-containing probiotics were associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates (41.98% vs 28.25%; RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.07–2.07; I²=29%). Effects were stronger with >14 days of treatment (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.44–2.75; I²=0%) than with ≤14 days (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.67–2.00). No adverse events were reported in the included trials, although adverse-event reporting was limited. RoB 2 judged no trial at high overall risk, but several had some concerns, mainly due to unclear blinding/allocation reporting; funnel plot inspection did not suggest marked asymmetry (Egger’s test not feasible). Exploratory synthesis of three observational studies (n = 67) found that 79% of infertile women with non-Lactobacillus-dominant endometrial microbiota converted to Lactobacillus-dominant status after probiotic treatment (pooled proportion 0.79, 95% CI 0.67–0.87; I²=0%), although ROBINS-I indicated moderate/high risk of bias. Limitations, reasons for caution Eligible RCTs were few, and live birth was rarely reported. Definitions of clinical pregnancy may vary across studies. Several trials had blinding/reporting limitations, and the microbiota endpoint relied on observational designs vulnerable to confounding and selection bias; therefore, mechanistic inferences should be cautious. Wider implications of the findings Lactobacillus-containing probiotics may be a noninvasive adjunct to improve ART outcomes, particularly with treatment beyond 2 weeks and in women with non-Lactobacillus-dominant endometrial microbiota. Future multicentre RCTs should standardise strains/doses/routes, incorporate baseline microbiota stratification, and evaluate live birth and safety with adequate power. Trial registration number Yes
含乳酸杆菌的益生菌可提高接受辅助生殖技术的不孕妇女的妊娠率:系统综述和荟萃分析
研究问题:在接受辅助生殖技术(ART)的不孕妇女中,与安慰剂或不治疗相比,含有乳酸杆菌的益生菌补充剂是否能提高临床妊娠率?含乳酸杆菌的益生菌与较高的临床妊娠率相关(RR为1.49),在服用&;gt;14天(RR 1.99)。尽管抗逆转录病毒治疗取得了进展,但仍有一部分患者继续经历着床失败,而且一旦胚胎质量得到优化,子宫/子宫内膜因素仍然难以改变。新出现的证据将子宫内膜微生物群组成与着床联系起来,在不育妇女中更常观察到非乳酸杆菌优势谱,并与较差的生殖结果相关;然而,含有乳酸杆菌的益生菌在抗逆转录病毒治疗中的试验显示出不一致的结果,可能是由于患者选择、益生菌菌株、给药途径和治疗时间的异质性。系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目-符合PROSPERO (CRD420251149619)注册的系统评价和随机效应荟萃分析。我们检索了PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL和ClinicalTrials.gov(2005年1月- 2025年10月;英文)。初步分析综合了接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的不孕妇女的随机对照试验(rct),比较了含乳酸杆菌的益生菌与安慰剂/无治疗的临床妊娠。二次探索性分析汇集了观察性16S rRNA研究,评估了向乳酸菌优势子宫内膜微生物群的转化。参与者/材料、环境、方法包括接受ART治疗的不孕妇女。含乳酸杆菌的益生菌(阴道/口服)与安慰剂或未治疗进行比较。两位审稿人独立筛选研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险(rob2; robins - 1)。随机效应模型汇集了临床妊娠的风险比,并根据治疗时间预先指定了亚组(14天vs≤14天)。探索性观察数据通过汇总从非乳酸菌显性向乳酸菌显性子宫内膜微生物群转化的女性比例(定义为≥90%的乳酸菌属)来合成。在筛选的517条记录中,纳入7项rct (n = 796;益生菌399,对照397;发表于2023-2025年)。含乳酸杆菌的益生菌与较高的临床妊娠率相关(41.98% vs 28.25%; RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.07-2.07; I²=29%)。使用&;gt;治疗14天组(RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.44-2.75; I²=0%)比治疗≤14天组(RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.67-2.00)。在纳入的试验中没有不良事件报告,尽管不良事件报告有限。RoB 2认为没有试验具有高总体风险,但有几个试验存在一些担忧,主要是由于盲法/分配报告不明确;漏斗图检验没有显示明显的不对称(Egger检验不可行)。三项观察性研究(n = 67)的探索性综合发现,79%的子宫内膜微生物群非乳酸杆菌优势的不孕妇女在接受益生菌治疗后转化为乳酸杆菌优势状态(合并比例0.79,95% CI 0.67-0.87; I²=0%),尽管ROBINS-I提示中/高偏倚风险。限制,谨慎的原因符合条件的随机对照试验很少,很少报道活产。临床妊娠的定义可能因研究而异。一些试验有盲法/报告局限性,微生物群终点依赖于易受混淆和选择偏倚影响的观察设计;因此,机械推理应谨慎。含有乳酸杆菌的益生菌可能是一种非侵入性的辅助治疗,以改善ART的结果,特别是治疗超过2周和非乳酸杆菌占优势的子宫内膜微生物群的妇女。未来的多中心随机对照试验应该标准化菌株/剂量/途径,纳入基线微生物群分层,并以足够的权力评估活产和安全性。试验注册号是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书