Did aging-related beliefs and behaviors change during the COVID-19 pandemic?

IF 3.8 2区 社会学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Sonja Radoš, Maria K Pavlova, Klaus Rothermund, Rainer K Silbereisen
{"title":"Did aging-related beliefs and behaviors change during the COVID-19 pandemic?","authors":"Sonja Radoš, Maria K Pavlova, Klaus Rothermund, Rainer K Silbereisen","doi":"10.1007/s10433-026-00929-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic reinforced the narrative of old-age vulnerability and disengagement. Using data from a nationally representative sample of German adults (N<sub>T1</sub> = 2,007, N<sub>T2</sub> = 733; age range 16-94 years), we investigated changes in aging-related beliefs and behaviors between 2016 and 2022. Specifically, we considered perceived expectations for active aging (PEAA), positive age stereotypes, and preparation for age-related changes in the domains of physical health, mental health, and social engagement. The average PEAA and positive age stereotypes significantly decreased across age groups and domains whereas preparation for age-related changes decreased slightly and only in the social engagement domain. Residual change analyses revealed a greater reduction in PEAA across domains among respondents with (vs. without) children in the household. In those with more pronounced populist political beliefs, PEAA in the social engagement domain diminished more. None of the focal predictors predicted change in positive age stereotypes. Surprisingly, working in an occupation disrupted by the pandemic (compared with relatively undisrupted occupations) predicted more positive change in preparation for age-related changes in the mental health domain. Overall, the public discourse regarding older people and old age during the pandemic may have contributed to the worsening of aging-related beliefs. The stability in preparation suggests that such behaviors served to adapt to the unique circumstances of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":47766,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ageing","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13341994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-026-00929-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic reinforced the narrative of old-age vulnerability and disengagement. Using data from a nationally representative sample of German adults (NT1 = 2,007, NT2 = 733; age range 16-94 years), we investigated changes in aging-related beliefs and behaviors between 2016 and 2022. Specifically, we considered perceived expectations for active aging (PEAA), positive age stereotypes, and preparation for age-related changes in the domains of physical health, mental health, and social engagement. The average PEAA and positive age stereotypes significantly decreased across age groups and domains whereas preparation for age-related changes decreased slightly and only in the social engagement domain. Residual change analyses revealed a greater reduction in PEAA across domains among respondents with (vs. without) children in the household. In those with more pronounced populist political beliefs, PEAA in the social engagement domain diminished more. None of the focal predictors predicted change in positive age stereotypes. Surprisingly, working in an occupation disrupted by the pandemic (compared with relatively undisrupted occupations) predicted more positive change in preparation for age-related changes in the mental health domain. Overall, the public discourse regarding older people and old age during the pandemic may have contributed to the worsening of aging-related beliefs. The stability in preparation suggests that such behaviors served to adapt to the unique circumstances of the pandemic.

在COVID-19大流行期间,与衰老相关的信念和行为发生了变化吗?
2019冠状病毒病大流行强化了老年人脆弱性和脱离接触的说法。使用来自德国成年人全国代表性样本(NT1 = 2007, NT2 = 733,年龄范围16-94岁)的数据,我们调查了2016年至2022年间与衰老相关的信念和行为的变化。具体来说,我们考虑了对积极老龄化(PEAA)的感知期望,积极的年龄刻板印象,以及在身体健康、心理健康和社会参与领域为年龄相关变化做准备。平均PEAA和积极的年龄刻板印象在各年龄组和领域显著下降,而对年龄相关变化的准备略有下降,而且只在社会参与领域。残差变化分析显示,在家庭中有(与没有)孩子的受访者中,跨域PEAA的减少幅度更大。在那些具有更明显的民粹主义政治信仰的人中,社会参与领域的PEAA下降得更多。没有一个焦点预测因子预测正面年龄刻板印象的改变。令人惊讶的是,在受大流行影响的职业中工作(与相对未受影响的职业相比)预示着更积极的变化,可以为心理健康领域与年龄相关的变化做准备。总体而言,大流行期间有关老年人和老年问题的公众言论可能助长了与老龄化有关的信念的恶化。准备工作的稳定性表明,这种行为有助于适应大流行的独特情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.90%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ageing: Social, Behavioural and Health Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the understanding of ageing in European societies and the world over. EJA publishes original articles on the social, behavioral and population health aspects of ageing and encourages an integrated approach between these aspects. Emphasis is put on publishing empirical research (including meta-analyses), but conceptual papers (including narrative reviews) and methodological contributions will also be considered. EJA welcomes expert opinions on critical issues in ageing. By stimulating communication between researchers and those using research findings, it aims to contribute to the formulation of better policies and the development of better practice in serving older adults. To further specify, with the term ''social'' is meant the full scope of social science of ageing related research from the micro to the macro level of analysis. With the term ''behavioural'' the full scope of psychological ageing research including life span approaches based on a range of age groups from young to old is envisaged. The term ''population health-related'' denotes social-epidemiological and public health oriented research including research on functional health in the widest possible sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书