A Bayesian Optimal Interval Design Considering Efficacy and Toxicity in Early Phase Basket Trials.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tomoyuki Kakizume, Kentaro Takeda, Masataka Taguri, Satoshi Morita
{"title":"A Bayesian Optimal Interval Design Considering Efficacy and Toxicity in Early Phase Basket Trials.","authors":"Tomoyuki Kakizume, Kentaro Takeda, Masataka Taguri, Satoshi Morita","doi":"10.1002/pst.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oncology drug development has increasingly shifted toward determining optimal biological doses rather than maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), particularly for targeted therapies and immunotherapies that exhibit complex dose-efficacy relationships. Concurrently, basket trials have emerged as an efficient approach for evaluating investigational treatments across multiple cancer types sharing common molecular targets. We propose the BOIN-ETB design, a model-assisted dose-finding design that addresses optimal dose (OD) identification in phase I/II basket trials by incorporating both toxicity and efficacy endpoints. The proposed approach employs common toxicity boundaries across cancer types while implementing cancer-specific efficacy boundaries to account for differential efficacy responses between baskets. OD selection utilizes utility functions that quantify efficacy-toxicity trade-offs. Through comprehensive simulation studies across Fourteen realistic scenarios, the BOIN-ETB design demonstrates robust performance in identifying true ODs while maintaining acceptable safety profiles across diverse cancer populations. The design provides superior consistency compared to alternative approaches, particularly in scenarios with heterogeneous dose-efficacy relationships between cancer types, making it well-suited for contemporary oncology dose-finding basket trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"25 4","pages":"e70108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oncology drug development has increasingly shifted toward determining optimal biological doses rather than maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), particularly for targeted therapies and immunotherapies that exhibit complex dose-efficacy relationships. Concurrently, basket trials have emerged as an efficient approach for evaluating investigational treatments across multiple cancer types sharing common molecular targets. We propose the BOIN-ETB design, a model-assisted dose-finding design that addresses optimal dose (OD) identification in phase I/II basket trials by incorporating both toxicity and efficacy endpoints. The proposed approach employs common toxicity boundaries across cancer types while implementing cancer-specific efficacy boundaries to account for differential efficacy responses between baskets. OD selection utilizes utility functions that quantify efficacy-toxicity trade-offs. Through comprehensive simulation studies across Fourteen realistic scenarios, the BOIN-ETB design demonstrates robust performance in identifying true ODs while maintaining acceptable safety profiles across diverse cancer populations. The design provides superior consistency compared to alternative approaches, particularly in scenarios with heterogeneous dose-efficacy relationships between cancer types, making it well-suited for contemporary oncology dose-finding basket trials.

早期篮子试验中考虑疗效和毒性的贝叶斯最优区间设计。
肿瘤药物开发越来越倾向于确定最佳生物剂量,而不是最大耐受剂量(MTDs),特别是对于表现出复杂剂量-功效关系的靶向治疗和免疫治疗。同时,篮子试验已经成为评估多种癌症类型研究治疗的有效方法,这些癌症类型具有共同的分子靶点。我们提出BOIN-ETB设计,这是一种模型辅助剂量发现设计,通过结合毒性和疗效终点,解决I/II期一揽子试验中最佳剂量(OD)的确定问题。所提出的方法采用不同癌症类型的共同毒性边界,同时实施癌症特异性疗效边界,以解释不同篮子之间的不同疗效反应。OD选择利用效用函数量化药效-毒性权衡。通过对14种现实场景的综合模拟研究,BOIN-ETB设计在识别真正的ODs方面表现出了强大的性能,同时在不同的癌症人群中保持了可接受的安全性。与其他方法相比,该设计提供了优越的一致性,特别是在癌症类型之间存在异质性剂量-功效关系的情况下,使其非常适合于当代肿瘤剂量寻找篮子试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书