Declining Overall Use of Cervical Disk Arthroplasty in Medicare Beneficiaries Despite Outpatient Migration, 2016 to 2022.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedics Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-08 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20260608-02
Mitchell K Ng, Paul G Mastrokostas, Aaron B Lavi, Luke B Schwartz, Leonidas E Mastrokostas, Jonathan Dalton, Yulia Lee, William Green, Yasmine Eichbaum, Gregorio Baek, Joshua Mathew, Morgan Hitchner, Alexander Kucherina, Alec Giakas, Pemla Jagtiani, Jad Bou Monsef, Afshin E Razi, Thomas D Cha, Mark F Kurd, Zachary Wilt, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"Declining Overall Use of Cervical Disk Arthroplasty in Medicare Beneficiaries Despite Outpatient Migration, 2016 to 2022.","authors":"Mitchell K Ng, Paul G Mastrokostas, Aaron B Lavi, Luke B Schwartz, Leonidas E Mastrokostas, Jonathan Dalton, Yulia Lee, William Green, Yasmine Eichbaum, Gregorio Baek, Joshua Mathew, Morgan Hitchner, Alexander Kucherina, Alec Giakas, Pemla Jagtiani, Jad Bou Monsef, Afshin E Razi, Thomas D Cha, Mark F Kurd, Zachary Wilt, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20260608-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) has gained popularity as a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treating cervical degenerative disk disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate national trends in Medicare use and reimbursement for CDA across settings, provider types, and geographic regions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective national database analysis using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Part A and Part B claims from 2016 to 2022. Single- and multilevel CDA procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group codes. Inflation-adjusted payments and procedure counts were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear regression, analysis of variance, and <i>t</i> tests. Subgroup comparisons included region, provider type, and core-based statistical area classification. Statistical significance was set at the <i>P</i> < .05 level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outpatient single-level CDA volume increased by 1,016.0% from 2016 to 2022, whereas inpatient CDA volume decreased by 90.3%. Outpatient reimbursement rose from $1,459 to $3,143 (<i>P</i> = .011), whereas inpatient reimbursement increased from $24,956 to $32,679 (<i>P</i> = .025). Reimbursement was significantly higher in ambulatory surgical centers than for surgeon-only claims ($11,869 vs $1,219; <i>P</i> < .001), and in inpatient settings compared to surgeons (<i>P</i> < .001). Regional and rural-urban variation was observed, with the West consistently demonstrating higher reimbursement and volume for both outpatient and inpatient CDA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDA procedures have shifted dramatically toward outpatient care, with marked differences in Medicare reimbursement across provider types and regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"e310-e316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20260608-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) has gained popularity as a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treating cervical degenerative disk disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate national trends in Medicare use and reimbursement for CDA across settings, provider types, and geographic regions.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective national database analysis using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Part A and Part B claims from 2016 to 2022. Single- and multilevel CDA procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group codes. Inflation-adjusted payments and procedure counts were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear regression, analysis of variance, and t tests. Subgroup comparisons included region, provider type, and core-based statistical area classification. Statistical significance was set at the P < .05 level.

Results: Outpatient single-level CDA volume increased by 1,016.0% from 2016 to 2022, whereas inpatient CDA volume decreased by 90.3%. Outpatient reimbursement rose from $1,459 to $3,143 (P = .011), whereas inpatient reimbursement increased from $24,956 to $32,679 (P = .025). Reimbursement was significantly higher in ambulatory surgical centers than for surgeon-only claims ($11,869 vs $1,219; P < .001), and in inpatient settings compared to surgeons (P < .001). Regional and rural-urban variation was observed, with the West consistently demonstrating higher reimbursement and volume for both outpatient and inpatient CDA.

Conclusion: CDA procedures have shifted dramatically toward outpatient care, with marked differences in Medicare reimbursement across provider types and regions.

2016年至2022年,尽管有门诊移民,但医疗保险受益人的颈椎椎间盘置换术总体使用率下降。
背景:颈椎椎间盘置换术(CDA)作为一种保持运动的替代方案,已被广泛应用于治疗颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病,而不是颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)。本研究的目的是评估全国医疗保险使用和CDA报销的趋势,包括设置、提供者类型和地理区域。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性的国家数据库分析,使用了2016年至2022年医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医疗保险a部分和B部分索赔。使用现行程序术语和医疗保险严重程度诊断相关组代码确定单级和多级CDA程序。采用描述性统计、线性回归、方差分析和t检验分析通货膨胀调整后的付款和程序计数。分组比较包括地区、提供者类型和基于核心的统计区域分类。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:2016 - 2022年,门诊单级CDA量增长1016.0%,住院CDA量下降90.3%。门诊报销从1459美元增加到3143美元(P = 0.011),而住院报销从24956美元增加到32679美元(P = 0.025)。门诊手术中心的报销明显高于外科医生报销(11,869美元vs 1,219美元;P < 0.001),住院患者的报销明显高于外科医生报销(P < 0.001)。观察到地区和城乡差异,西部始终表现出门诊和住院CDA的较高报销和数量。结论:CDA程序已显著转向门诊护理,医疗保险报销在提供者类型和地区之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书