National review of state laws on opioid antagonists in Kindergarten-12th grade schools across the United States.

IF 4.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Monica Kowalczyk, Cathleen Chow, Hannah Huebner, Suzanne Carlberg-Racich, Charles Davis, Christina E Freibott, Nicole Gastala, Ashley A Lowe, Anna Volerman
{"title":"National review of state laws on opioid antagonists in Kindergarten-12th grade schools across the United States.","authors":"Monica Kowalczyk, Cathleen Chow, Hannah Huebner, Suzanne Carlberg-Racich, Charles Davis, Christina E Freibott, Nicole Gastala, Ashley A Lowe, Anna Volerman","doi":"10.1186/s12954-026-01504-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid overdoses have surged among United States (US) youth, who face high risk of morbidity and mortality. Opioid antagonists (OAs), like naloxone, are life-saving medications that can reverse overdoses. For youth, schools can be key venues for harm reduction. As states enact laws governing OAs in schools, it is important to understand how states permit schools to manage and respond to emergencies with this medication. This study's objective was to examine statutes on OAs in Kindergarten-12th grade schools to identify and compare key legislative components across states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This national review analyzed US state laws on OAs in K-12 schools enacted by December 31, 2024. A search of statutes was conducted using Nexis Uni. Team members iteratively reviewed each statute to identify components and extract relevant language. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Findings were summarized and reviewed with experts in school health, addiction, and harm reduction for validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight states have laws on OAs in K-12 schools. Nine states (24%) mandate a supply of OAs to be available in schools, while eight states (21%) require policies to be adopted for school systems to have OAs. State laws vary in terms of components. State laws commonly define OA (n = 24, 63%) and specify school types and/or levels (n = 35, 92%). Most states detail individual(s) who may administer OAs in school settings (n = 34, 89%) and training on OAs (n = 25, 66%). More than half of states detail acquisition (n = 22, 58%) and inventory logistics (n = 21, 55%). Few state laws include incident response post-administration (n = 9, 24%), reporting of administration (n = 8, 21%), and parental involvement (n = 5, 13%). Lastly, most states include immunity (n = 32, 84%) protecting school systems and/or individuals who provide or administer OAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found most states have laws on OAs in K-12 schools with variation in specific language. Such variability in state legislation contributes to varied implementation in school, which may affect accessibility to OAs and response to overdose emergencies in schools. If implemented effectively, such legislation has potential to promote harm reduction and reduce opioid overdoses among youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-026-01504-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid overdoses have surged among United States (US) youth, who face high risk of morbidity and mortality. Opioid antagonists (OAs), like naloxone, are life-saving medications that can reverse overdoses. For youth, schools can be key venues for harm reduction. As states enact laws governing OAs in schools, it is important to understand how states permit schools to manage and respond to emergencies with this medication. This study's objective was to examine statutes on OAs in Kindergarten-12th grade schools to identify and compare key legislative components across states.

Methods: This national review analyzed US state laws on OAs in K-12 schools enacted by December 31, 2024. A search of statutes was conducted using Nexis Uni. Team members iteratively reviewed each statute to identify components and extract relevant language. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Findings were summarized and reviewed with experts in school health, addiction, and harm reduction for validity.

Results: Thirty-eight states have laws on OAs in K-12 schools. Nine states (24%) mandate a supply of OAs to be available in schools, while eight states (21%) require policies to be adopted for school systems to have OAs. State laws vary in terms of components. State laws commonly define OA (n = 24, 63%) and specify school types and/or levels (n = 35, 92%). Most states detail individual(s) who may administer OAs in school settings (n = 34, 89%) and training on OAs (n = 25, 66%). More than half of states detail acquisition (n = 22, 58%) and inventory logistics (n = 21, 55%). Few state laws include incident response post-administration (n = 9, 24%), reporting of administration (n = 8, 21%), and parental involvement (n = 5, 13%). Lastly, most states include immunity (n = 32, 84%) protecting school systems and/or individuals who provide or administer OAs.

Conclusion: This study found most states have laws on OAs in K-12 schools with variation in specific language. Such variability in state legislation contributes to varied implementation in school, which may affect accessibility to OAs and response to overdose emergencies in schools. If implemented effectively, such legislation has potential to promote harm reduction and reduce opioid overdoses among youth.

对美国幼儿园-12年级阿片类拮抗剂州法律的国家审查。
背景:阿片类药物过量在美国年轻人中激增,他们面临着很高的发病率和死亡率。阿片类拮抗剂(OAs),如纳洛酮,是可以逆转过量服用的救命药物。对青少年来说,学校可以成为减少伤害的关键场所。随着各州颁布法律管理学校的OAs,了解各州如何允许学校管理和应对这种药物的紧急情况是很重要的。本研究的目的是检查幼儿园至12年级学校的oa法规,以确定和比较各州的关键立法组成部分。方法:本全国性综述分析了美国各州在2024年12月31日之前颁布的关于K-12学校oa的法律。使用Nexis Uni对法规进行了搜索。团队成员反复审查每个法规,以确定组成部分并提取相关语言。分歧通过讨论解决了。对研究结果进行了总结,并与学校健康、成瘾和危害减少方面的专家进行了审查。结果:38个州对K-12学校的oa有法律规定。9个州(24%)要求学校提供课外活动组织,8个州(21%)要求采取政策,使学校系统拥有课外活动组织。各州法律的组成部分各不相同。州法律通常定义OA (n = 24, 63%),并规定学校类型和/或水平(n = 35, 92%)。大多数州详细介绍了可能在学校环境中管理oa的个人(n = 34, 89%)和oa培训(n = 25, 66%)。超过一半的州详细说明了采购(n = 22,58%)和库存物流(n = 21,55%)。少数州的法律包括事件处理后的响应(n = 9, 24%)、管理报告(n = 8, 21%)和家长参与(n = 5, 13%)。最后,大多数州包括豁免权(n = 32,84%),以保护提供或管理oa的学校系统和/或个人。结论:本研究发现,大多数州在K-12学校都有关于特定语言差异的oa法律。州立法的这种可变性导致学校的执行情况各不相同,这可能影响到获得oa的机会和学校对药物过量紧急情况的反应。如果得到有效实施,这种立法有可能促进减少危害和减少青少年中阿片类药物的过量使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书