Feasibility of applying the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach in a Danish municipal neurorehabilitation context.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Tove Lise Nielsen, Helene Polatajko, Mette Brandi, Helene Windstrup Holst-Stensborg, Louise Moeldrup Nielsen
{"title":"Feasibility of applying the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach in a Danish municipal neurorehabilitation context.","authors":"Tove Lise Nielsen, Helene Polatajko, Mette Brandi, Helene Windstrup Holst-Stensborg, Louise Moeldrup Nielsen","doi":"10.1177/02692155261465889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis feasibility study examined the following aspects of applying Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance to stroke survivors: recruitment, dose, fidelity, perceived value, benefits, harms and potential outcomes.DesignSingle-group pretest-posttest design.SettingDanish municipal neurorehabilitation centre.SubjectsHome-living stroke survivors aged 45 years or older, with a score of at least 20 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, referred from hospital or rehabilitation units. Participants identified at least two occupational performance issues.InterventionsThe Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance approach aims to improve occupational performance through a therapist-guided process focusing on problem-solving, strategy use, generalisation and transfer. Three occupational therapists delivered the intervention.Main measuresData on participant characteristics and feasibility aspects were collected using surveys, registration forms, interviews and performance-based measures. Occupational performance was assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and the Performance Quality Rating Scale.ResultsOf 65 invited stroke survivors, 20 (30.8%) were enrolled. Recruitment took longer than expected due to organisational factors. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity and was perceived as meaningful by both therapists and participants. Significant improvements (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed in occupational performance on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: performance (mean difference 2.98), satisfaction (mean difference 4.33) and on the Performance Quality Rating Scale (mean difference 2.69).ConclusionThe intervention was feasible in this setting. A full-scale effectiveness study is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155261465889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155261465889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis feasibility study examined the following aspects of applying Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance to stroke survivors: recruitment, dose, fidelity, perceived value, benefits, harms and potential outcomes.DesignSingle-group pretest-posttest design.SettingDanish municipal neurorehabilitation centre.SubjectsHome-living stroke survivors aged 45 years or older, with a score of at least 20 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, referred from hospital or rehabilitation units. Participants identified at least two occupational performance issues.InterventionsThe Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance approach aims to improve occupational performance through a therapist-guided process focusing on problem-solving, strategy use, generalisation and transfer. Three occupational therapists delivered the intervention.Main measuresData on participant characteristics and feasibility aspects were collected using surveys, registration forms, interviews and performance-based measures. Occupational performance was assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and the Performance Quality Rating Scale.ResultsOf 65 invited stroke survivors, 20 (30.8%) were enrolled. Recruitment took longer than expected due to organisational factors. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity and was perceived as meaningful by both therapists and participants. Significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed in occupational performance on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: performance (mean difference 2.98), satisfaction (mean difference 4.33) and on the Performance Quality Rating Scale (mean difference 2.69).ConclusionThe intervention was feasible in this setting. A full-scale effectiveness study is warranted.

在丹麦市政神经康复环境中应用认知取向到日常职业表现(CO-OP)方法的可行性。
目的探讨认知取向在脑卒中幸存者日常职业表现中的应用:招募、剂量、忠实度、感知价值、益处、危害和潜在结果。设计单组前测后测设计。丹麦市政神经康复中心。受试者年龄在45岁或以上,蒙特利尔认知评估得分至少为20分,从医院或康复部门转介的居家中风幸存者。参与者发现了至少两个职业表现问题。干预日常职业绩效的认知取向方法旨在通过治疗师指导的过程,重点关注解决问题,策略使用,概括和转移,提高职业绩效。三名职业治疗师进行了干预。主要措施采用问卷调查、登记表、访谈和基于绩效的措施收集参与者特征和可行性方面的数据。使用加拿大职业绩效量表和绩效质量评定量表评估职业绩效。结果65例卒中幸存者中,20例(30.8%)入选。由于组织因素,招聘时间比预期的要长。干预以高保真度交付,并且被治疗师和参与者都认为是有意义的。重大改进(p)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书