Diagnostic Accuracy of Ischemia and Hemorrhage on Cone-Beam CT Immediately After Endovascular Thrombectomy.

IF 3.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2026-05-01 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1161/SVIN.125.002211
Lovisa Landström, Henrik Andersson, Mattias Drake, Helena Mellander Oxholm, Emma Hall, Veronica Fransson, Björn M Hansen, Johan Wassélius
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Ischemia and Hemorrhage on Cone-Beam CT Immediately After Endovascular Thrombectomy.","authors":"Lovisa Landström, Henrik Andersson, Mattias Drake, Helena Mellander Oxholm, Emma Hall, Veronica Fransson, Björn M Hansen, Johan Wassélius","doi":"10.1161/SVIN.125.002211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Detection of ischemia and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) directly after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) could enable earlier diagnosis and treatment. We evaluated whether post-EVT Sine Spin cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the Siemens ARTIS Icono biplane system at the end of the procedure can predict ischemia and ICH on subsequent follow-up computed tomography (FUCT) within 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing EVT in 2024 with available CBCT and FUCT were included. Two interventional neuroradiologists independently evaluated the CBCT examinations for ischemia, ICH (including Heidelberg classification), and image quality. FUCT, annotated by a neuroradiologist, was used as reference standard. Large ischemia was defined as ischemia involving ≥3 predefined vascular territories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 331 patients with EVT, 225 had both CBCT and FUCT, of which 197 (88%) were successfully recanalized. Ischemia was observed in 127 (56%) and ICH in 64 (28%) of the FUCTs. For ICH, sensitivity was 75%/77% (reviewer 1/reviewer 2), specificity 85%/84%, and positive predictive value 67% for both reviewers, negative predictive value 92%/91%, and accuracy 84%/83%. Accuracy for large ischemia (n=24, 11%) was 78%/67%. Sensitivity for correctly located ischemia on CBCT was 48%/73%, with specificity of 87%/60%, positive predictive value of 82%/71%, negative predictive value of 56%/63%, and accuracy of 65%/68%. CBCT was rated overall nondiagnostic in 0%/1% of the cases. For the posterior fossa specifically, 6%/16% of examinations were rated nondiagnostic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sine Spin CBCT on the Siemens ARTIS Icono biplane system after EVT showed high accuracy for predicting ICH and large ischemia on FUCT. CBCT may help identify patients needing closer monitoring or early neurosurgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"6 4","pages":"e002211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.125.002211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Detection of ischemia and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) directly after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) could enable earlier diagnosis and treatment. We evaluated whether post-EVT Sine Spin cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the Siemens ARTIS Icono biplane system at the end of the procedure can predict ischemia and ICH on subsequent follow-up computed tomography (FUCT) within 48 hours.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing EVT in 2024 with available CBCT and FUCT were included. Two interventional neuroradiologists independently evaluated the CBCT examinations for ischemia, ICH (including Heidelberg classification), and image quality. FUCT, annotated by a neuroradiologist, was used as reference standard. Large ischemia was defined as ischemia involving ≥3 predefined vascular territories.

Results: Of 331 patients with EVT, 225 had both CBCT and FUCT, of which 197 (88%) were successfully recanalized. Ischemia was observed in 127 (56%) and ICH in 64 (28%) of the FUCTs. For ICH, sensitivity was 75%/77% (reviewer 1/reviewer 2), specificity 85%/84%, and positive predictive value 67% for both reviewers, negative predictive value 92%/91%, and accuracy 84%/83%. Accuracy for large ischemia (n=24, 11%) was 78%/67%. Sensitivity for correctly located ischemia on CBCT was 48%/73%, with specificity of 87%/60%, positive predictive value of 82%/71%, negative predictive value of 56%/63%, and accuracy of 65%/68%. CBCT was rated overall nondiagnostic in 0%/1% of the cases. For the posterior fossa specifically, 6%/16% of examinations were rated nondiagnostic.

Conclusions: Sine Spin CBCT on the Siemens ARTIS Icono biplane system after EVT showed high accuracy for predicting ICH and large ischemia on FUCT. CBCT may help identify patients needing closer monitoring or early neurosurgical intervention.

锥形束CT对血管内取栓术后缺血出血的诊断准确性。
背景:血管内取栓术(EVT)后直接检测缺血和颅内出血(ICH),有助于早期诊断和治疗。我们评估了手术结束时在西门子ARTIS Icono双翼系统上进行evt后正弦自旋锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)是否可以预测48小时内随访计算机断层扫描(FUCT)的缺血和脑出血。方法:纳入2024年行EVT且CBCT和FUCT可用的成年患者。两名介入神经放射学家独立评估CBCT检查对缺血、脑出血(包括Heidelberg分类)和图像质量的影响。以神经放射学家注释的FUCT作为参考标准。大缺血被定义为涉及≥3个预定义血管区域的缺血。结果:331例EVT患者中,225例同时有CBCT和FUCT,其中197例(88%)成功再通。127例(56%)脑缺血,64例(28%)脑出血。对于ICH,敏感性为75%/77%(审稿人1/审稿人2),特异性为85%/84%,两名审稿人的阳性预测值为67%,阴性预测值为92%/91%,准确率为84%/83%。大缺血(n=24, 11%)的准确率为78%/67%。CBCT对缺血正确定位的敏感性为48%/73%,特异性为87%/60%,阳性预测值为82%/71%,阴性预测值为56%/63%,准确率为65%/68%。在0%/1%的病例中,CBCT被评为总体无诊断性。特别是后窝,6%/16%的检查被评为无诊断性。结论:Siemens ARTIS Icono双翼系统上的正弦自旋CBCT对EVT后脑出血和功能性脑梗死大缺血的预测具有较高的准确性。CBCT可能有助于识别需要更密切监测或早期神经外科干预的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书