Francesca Greco, Matteo Galetto, Maria Vaccaro, Marco De Spirito, Andrea Fidanzio, Elisa Placidi, Enrico Rosa, Gerardina Stimato, Stefania Teodoli, Silvia Mariani, Nicola Dinapoli, Vincenzo Frascino, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Silvia Chiesa, Elisa Meldolesi
{"title":"In vivo dosimetry using an electronic portal imaging device for pediatric myeloablative Total body irradiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy","authors":"Francesca Greco, Matteo Galetto, Maria Vaccaro, Marco De Spirito, Andrea Fidanzio, Elisa Placidi, Enrico Rosa, Gerardina Stimato, Stefania Teodoli, Silvia Mariani, Nicola Dinapoli, Vincenzo Frascino, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Silvia Chiesa, Elisa Meldolesi","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) has enabled highly conformal Total Body Irradiation (TBI), improving dose homogeneity and sparing of organs-of-interest. However, the increased complexity of VMAT-based TBI requires robust quality assurance strategies. This study evaluated the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID)-based in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) for VMAT TBI treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Forty pediatric patients treated with VMAT-based TBI were retrospectively analyzed with two prescription schemes: 12 Gy/six fractions and 9.99 Gy/three fractions. EPID transmission images were acquired during each VMAT arc and analyzed using a gamma passing rate (Pγ) of 5%/2 mm, 10% threshold. IVD was evaluated across different anatomical regions. The impact of inter-fraction anatomical variations (weight loss, abdominal swelling, gastrointestinal air) was assessed through dose recalculations on modified CT datasets. Phantom measurements were performed to validate the sensitivity of EPID-based IVD to clinically relevant perturbations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>IVD measurements showed median Pγ of 97.3 ± 3.2%. Across the forty patients, a mean Pγ of 99.3 ± 0.8% and 99.0 ± 0.4% was observed in the head and thoracic regions respectively, lower values (96.5 ± 3.4% and 94.3 ± 3.6%) were found in the lumbar and pelvic regions respectively. Simulated abdominal swelling ≥1.5 cm reduced target coverage, while weight loss and gastrointestinal air had limited dosimetric impact. Phantom tests confirmed IVD sensitivity to significant anatomical changes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>EPID-based IVD was a feasible tool for verifying VMAT-based TBI, enabling detection of clinically relevant inter-fraction anatomical variations and supporting safe treatment delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101025"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631626001259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) has enabled highly conformal Total Body Irradiation (TBI), improving dose homogeneity and sparing of organs-of-interest. However, the increased complexity of VMAT-based TBI requires robust quality assurance strategies. This study evaluated the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID)-based in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) for VMAT TBI treatments.
Materials and Methods
Forty pediatric patients treated with VMAT-based TBI were retrospectively analyzed with two prescription schemes: 12 Gy/six fractions and 9.99 Gy/three fractions. EPID transmission images were acquired during each VMAT arc and analyzed using a gamma passing rate (Pγ) of 5%/2 mm, 10% threshold. IVD was evaluated across different anatomical regions. The impact of inter-fraction anatomical variations (weight loss, abdominal swelling, gastrointestinal air) was assessed through dose recalculations on modified CT datasets. Phantom measurements were performed to validate the sensitivity of EPID-based IVD to clinically relevant perturbations.
Results
IVD measurements showed median Pγ of 97.3 ± 3.2%. Across the forty patients, a mean Pγ of 99.3 ± 0.8% and 99.0 ± 0.4% was observed in the head and thoracic regions respectively, lower values (96.5 ± 3.4% and 94.3 ± 3.6%) were found in the lumbar and pelvic regions respectively. Simulated abdominal swelling ≥1.5 cm reduced target coverage, while weight loss and gastrointestinal air had limited dosimetric impact. Phantom tests confirmed IVD sensitivity to significant anatomical changes.
Conclusions
EPID-based IVD was a feasible tool for verifying VMAT-based TBI, enabling detection of clinically relevant inter-fraction anatomical variations and supporting safe treatment delivery.