Radhika Juglan, Marta Ligero, Zunamys I Carrero, Asier Rabasco Meneghetti, Tim Lenz, Leo Misera, Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen, Paul Kuntke, Hagen H Kitzler, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn, Jakob Nikolas Kather
{"title":"Generalizable and explainable deep learning for brain MRI: a multi-cohort evaluation of 3D architectures for age and sex prediction.","authors":"Radhika Juglan, Marta Ligero, Zunamys I Carrero, Asier Rabasco Meneghetti, Tim Lenz, Leo Misera, Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen, Paul Kuntke, Hagen H Kitzler, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn, Jakob Nikolas Kather","doi":"10.1186/s40708-026-00316-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning (DL) methods increasingly outperform classical approaches in brain MRI analysis, yet their generalizability across independent imaging cohorts remains insufficiently evaluated. Because age and sex are fundamental neurobiological factors influencing brain structure and disease risk, this study systematically compares three three-dimensional architectures-Simple Fully Convolutional Network (SFCN), DenseNet121, and Swin Transformer-for age and sex prediction using T1-weighted MRI from four independent cohorts: UK Biobank (UKB, n = 47,390), Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (DLBS, n = 132), Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI, n = 108 controls), and Information eXtraction from Images (IXI, n = 319). SFCN consistently demonstrated the most robust performance. For sex classification, it achieved an AUC of 1.00 [1.00-1.00] in the UKB internal test set and 0.85-0.91 across external cohorts. For age prediction, SFCN achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.66 years (r = 0.89) internally and 4.98-5.81 years (r = 0.55-0.70) externally. Pairwise DeLong and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction confirmed significantly better performance of SFCN compared with Swin Transformer in most cohorts (p < 0.017). No significant demographic subgroup biases were observed. Explainability analyses further showed task-specific and spatially consistent attention patterns across cohorts. These findings demonstrate that simpler convolutional architectures can generalize more reliably than more complex attention-based models in multi-cohort settings. The study highlights the importance of external validation and emphasizes potential trade-offs between model complexity, robustness, and interpretability for clinically relevant neuroimaging applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":37465,"journal":{"name":"Brain Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13342005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-026-00316-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) methods increasingly outperform classical approaches in brain MRI analysis, yet their generalizability across independent imaging cohorts remains insufficiently evaluated. Because age and sex are fundamental neurobiological factors influencing brain structure and disease risk, this study systematically compares three three-dimensional architectures-Simple Fully Convolutional Network (SFCN), DenseNet121, and Swin Transformer-for age and sex prediction using T1-weighted MRI from four independent cohorts: UK Biobank (UKB, n = 47,390), Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (DLBS, n = 132), Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI, n = 108 controls), and Information eXtraction from Images (IXI, n = 319). SFCN consistently demonstrated the most robust performance. For sex classification, it achieved an AUC of 1.00 [1.00-1.00] in the UKB internal test set and 0.85-0.91 across external cohorts. For age prediction, SFCN achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.66 years (r = 0.89) internally and 4.98-5.81 years (r = 0.55-0.70) externally. Pairwise DeLong and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction confirmed significantly better performance of SFCN compared with Swin Transformer in most cohorts (p < 0.017). No significant demographic subgroup biases were observed. Explainability analyses further showed task-specific and spatially consistent attention patterns across cohorts. These findings demonstrate that simpler convolutional architectures can generalize more reliably than more complex attention-based models in multi-cohort settings. The study highlights the importance of external validation and emphasizes potential trade-offs between model complexity, robustness, and interpretability for clinically relevant neuroimaging applications.
期刊介绍:
Brain Informatics is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary open-access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen, which provides a unique platform for researchers and practitioners to disseminate original research on computational and informatics technologies related to brain. This journal addresses the computational, cognitive, physiological, biological, physical, ecological and social perspectives of brain informatics. It also welcomes emerging information technologies and advanced neuro-imaging technologies, such as big data analytics and interactive knowledge discovery related to various large-scale brain studies and their applications. This journal will publish high-quality original research papers, brief reports and critical reviews in all theoretical, technological, clinical and interdisciplinary studies that make up the field of brain informatics and its applications in brain-machine intelligence, brain-inspired intelligent systems, mental health and brain disorders, etc. The scope of papers includes the following five tracks: Track 1: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Brain Science Track 2: Human Information Processing Systems Track 3: Brain Big Data Analytics, Curation and Management Track 4: Informatics Paradigms for Brain and Mental Health Research Track 5: Brain-Machine Intelligence and Brain-Inspired Computing