Generalizable and explainable deep learning for brain MRI: a multi-cohort evaluation of 3D architectures for age and sex prediction.

IF 8.3 Q1 Computer Science
Radhika Juglan, Marta Ligero, Zunamys I Carrero, Asier Rabasco Meneghetti, Tim Lenz, Leo Misera, Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen, Paul Kuntke, Hagen H Kitzler, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn, Jakob Nikolas Kather
{"title":"Generalizable and explainable deep learning for brain MRI: a multi-cohort evaluation of 3D architectures for age and sex prediction.","authors":"Radhika Juglan, Marta Ligero, Zunamys I Carrero, Asier Rabasco Meneghetti, Tim Lenz, Leo Misera, Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen, Paul Kuntke, Hagen H Kitzler, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn, Jakob Nikolas Kather","doi":"10.1186/s40708-026-00316-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning (DL) methods increasingly outperform classical approaches in brain MRI analysis, yet their generalizability across independent imaging cohorts remains insufficiently evaluated. Because age and sex are fundamental neurobiological factors influencing brain structure and disease risk, this study systematically compares three three-dimensional architectures-Simple Fully Convolutional Network (SFCN), DenseNet121, and Swin Transformer-for age and sex prediction using T1-weighted MRI from four independent cohorts: UK Biobank (UKB, n = 47,390), Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (DLBS, n = 132), Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI, n = 108 controls), and Information eXtraction from Images (IXI, n = 319). SFCN consistently demonstrated the most robust performance. For sex classification, it achieved an AUC of 1.00 [1.00-1.00] in the UKB internal test set and 0.85-0.91 across external cohorts. For age prediction, SFCN achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.66 years (r = 0.89) internally and 4.98-5.81 years (r = 0.55-0.70) externally. Pairwise DeLong and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction confirmed significantly better performance of SFCN compared with Swin Transformer in most cohorts (p < 0.017). No significant demographic subgroup biases were observed. Explainability analyses further showed task-specific and spatially consistent attention patterns across cohorts. These findings demonstrate that simpler convolutional architectures can generalize more reliably than more complex attention-based models in multi-cohort settings. The study highlights the importance of external validation and emphasizes potential trade-offs between model complexity, robustness, and interpretability for clinically relevant neuroimaging applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":37465,"journal":{"name":"Brain Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13342005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-026-00316-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) methods increasingly outperform classical approaches in brain MRI analysis, yet their generalizability across independent imaging cohorts remains insufficiently evaluated. Because age and sex are fundamental neurobiological factors influencing brain structure and disease risk, this study systematically compares three three-dimensional architectures-Simple Fully Convolutional Network (SFCN), DenseNet121, and Swin Transformer-for age and sex prediction using T1-weighted MRI from four independent cohorts: UK Biobank (UKB, n = 47,390), Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (DLBS, n = 132), Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI, n = 108 controls), and Information eXtraction from Images (IXI, n = 319). SFCN consistently demonstrated the most robust performance. For sex classification, it achieved an AUC of 1.00 [1.00-1.00] in the UKB internal test set and 0.85-0.91 across external cohorts. For age prediction, SFCN achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.66 years (r = 0.89) internally and 4.98-5.81 years (r = 0.55-0.70) externally. Pairwise DeLong and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction confirmed significantly better performance of SFCN compared with Swin Transformer in most cohorts (p < 0.017). No significant demographic subgroup biases were observed. Explainability analyses further showed task-specific and spatially consistent attention patterns across cohorts. These findings demonstrate that simpler convolutional architectures can generalize more reliably than more complex attention-based models in multi-cohort settings. The study highlights the importance of external validation and emphasizes potential trade-offs between model complexity, robustness, and interpretability for clinically relevant neuroimaging applications.

脑MRI的可概括和可解释的深度学习:年龄和性别预测的3D架构的多队列评估。
深度学习(DL)方法在脑MRI分析中的表现越来越优于经典方法,但其在独立成像队列中的通用性仍未得到充分评估。由于年龄和性别是影响大脑结构和疾病风险的基本神经生物学因素,本研究系统地比较了三种三维结构——简单全卷积网络(SFCN)、DenseNet121和Swin transformer——使用来自四个独立队列的t1加权MRI预测年龄和性别。英国生物银行(UKB, n = 47,390)、达拉斯寿命脑研究(DLBS, n = 132)、帕金森进展标志物计划(PPMI, n = 108对照)和图像信息提取(IXI, n = 319)。SFCN始终表现出最稳健的性能。对于性别分类,UKB内部测试集的AUC为1.00[1.00-1.00],外部队列的AUC为0.85-0.91。对于年龄预测,SFCN内部的平均绝对误差(MAE)为2.66岁(r = 0.89),外部的平均绝对误差为4.98 ~ 5.81岁(r = 0.55 ~ 0.70)。采用Bonferroni校正的DeLong和Wilcoxon成对试验证实,在大多数队列中,SFCN的性能明显优于Swin Transformer
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Informatics
Brain Informatics Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Informatics is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary open-access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen, which provides a unique platform for researchers and practitioners to disseminate original research on computational and informatics technologies related to brain. This journal addresses the computational, cognitive, physiological, biological, physical, ecological and social perspectives of brain informatics. It also welcomes emerging information technologies and advanced neuro-imaging technologies, such as big data analytics and interactive knowledge discovery related to various large-scale brain studies and their applications. This journal will publish high-quality original research papers, brief reports and critical reviews in all theoretical, technological, clinical and interdisciplinary studies that make up the field of brain informatics and its applications in brain-machine intelligence, brain-inspired intelligent systems, mental health and brain disorders, etc. The scope of papers includes the following five tracks: Track 1: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Brain Science Track 2: Human Information Processing Systems Track 3: Brain Big Data Analytics, Curation and Management Track 4: Informatics Paradigms for Brain and Mental Health Research Track 5: Brain-Machine Intelligence and Brain-Inspired Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书