Validity of an Alternaria alternata Skin Prick Test Extract for Diagnosing Sensitization.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2026-06-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S617276
Xin Li, Jianqing Gu, Ruiqi Wang, Lianglu Wang, Hong Li, Jinlyu Sun, Yuxiang Zhi, Kai Guan, Liping Wen, Zixi Wang, Lisha Li, Rui Tang, Le Cui, Yingyang Xu, Tao Xu, Jia Yin
{"title":"Validity of an <i>Alternaria alternata</i> Skin Prick Test Extract for Diagnosing Sensitization.","authors":"Xin Li, Jianqing Gu, Ruiqi Wang, Lianglu Wang, Hong Li, Jinlyu Sun, Yuxiang Zhi, Kai Guan, Liping Wen, Zixi Wang, Lisha Li, Rui Tang, Le Cui, Yingyang Xu, Tao Xu, Jia Yin","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S617276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Alternaria alternata</i> is a major fungal allergen, yet standardized skin prick test (SPT) extracts are lacking in China, hindering the use of this simple, first-line diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to clinically evaluate a novel, domestically developed <i>A. alternata</i> extract for SPT and establish a diagnostic cutoff in a Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this prospective, single-center study, 910 patients with allergic diseases were consecutively enrolled. All underwent SPT with the in-house <i>A. alternata</i> extract (Alt a 1: 25.7-34.8 µg/mL). Serum-specific IgE (sIgE) (ImmunoCAP™) served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The per-protocol set included 610 subjects. The area under the ROC curve was 0.868 (95% CI: 0.839-0.897). The optimal diagnostic cutoff was a mean wheal diameter of 3.25 mm, yielding a sensitivity of 81.10% (95% CI: 76.76%-85.24%) and specificity of 79.32% (95% CI: 74.46%-84.18%). To achieve 95% specificity, the cutoff increased to 4.25 mm. No adverse events were reported among all 910 participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel <i>A. alternata</i> SPT extract demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for detecting <i>Alternaria alternata</i> sensitization and an excellent safety profile. The established cutoff of 3.25 mm provides a population-optimized threshold for identifying sensitized individuals in China. This study addresses a critical gap in allergen standardization and supports the use of SPT as a reliable first-line tool for assessing fungal sensitization in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR ChiCTR1800014899. Registered 13 February 2018 (retrospectively registered).</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"19 ","pages":"617276"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13332756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S617276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alternaria alternata is a major fungal allergen, yet standardized skin prick test (SPT) extracts are lacking in China, hindering the use of this simple, first-line diagnostic tool.

Objective: This study aimed to clinically evaluate a novel, domestically developed A. alternata extract for SPT and establish a diagnostic cutoff in a Chinese population.

Patients and methods: In this prospective, single-center study, 910 patients with allergic diseases were consecutively enrolled. All underwent SPT with the in-house A. alternata extract (Alt a 1: 25.7-34.8 µg/mL). Serum-specific IgE (sIgE) (ImmunoCAP™) served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events.

Results: The per-protocol set included 610 subjects. The area under the ROC curve was 0.868 (95% CI: 0.839-0.897). The optimal diagnostic cutoff was a mean wheal diameter of 3.25 mm, yielding a sensitivity of 81.10% (95% CI: 76.76%-85.24%) and specificity of 79.32% (95% CI: 74.46%-84.18%). To achieve 95% specificity, the cutoff increased to 4.25 mm. No adverse events were reported among all 910 participants.

Conclusion: The novel A. alternata SPT extract demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for detecting Alternaria alternata sensitization and an excellent safety profile. The established cutoff of 3.25 mm provides a population-optimized threshold for identifying sensitized individuals in China. This study addresses a critical gap in allergen standardization and supports the use of SPT as a reliable first-line tool for assessing fungal sensitization in clinical practice.

Trial registration: ChiCTR ChiCTR1800014899. Registered 13 February 2018 (retrospectively registered).

互生草皮肤点刺试验提取物诊断致敏性的有效性。
背景:交替孢霉是一种主要的真菌过敏原,但标准化的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)提取物在中国缺乏,阻碍了这种简单的一线诊断工具的使用。目的:本研究旨在临床评估一种新型的、国内开发的交替草提取物治疗SPT,并在中国人群中建立诊断临界值。患者和方法:在这项前瞻性、单中心研究中,连续入组了910例过敏性疾病患者。所有患者都接受了室内交替草提取物(Alt a 1:25 .7-34.8µg/mL)的SPT治疗。血清特异性IgE (sIgE) (ImmunoCAP™)作为参比标准。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析诊断准确性。通过监测不良事件来评估安全性。结果:每个方案集包括610名受试者。ROC曲线下面积为0.868 (95% CI: 0.839 ~ 0.897)。最佳诊断临界值为平均轮径3.25 mm,敏感性为81.10% (95% CI: 76.76% ~ 85.24%),特异性为79.32% (95% CI: 74.46% ~ 84.18%)。为了达到95%的特异性,临界值增加到4.25 mm。在所有910名参与者中没有不良事件的报告。结论:该提取物具有较高的敏化诊断准确性和良好的安全性。3.25 mm的临界值为识别中国敏感个体提供了一个人群优化阈值。本研究解决了过敏原标准化的关键空白,并支持将SPT作为临床实践中评估真菌致敏性的可靠一线工具。试验注册号:ChiCTR ChiCTR1800014899。2018年2月13日注册(回顾性注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书