Tool for identifying occupational exposures and risks in agriculture (TIERRA): application in coffee farming in Uganda.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
International Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2026-06-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ijph.2026.1609449
Hannah Wey, Lena Jäggi, Aggrey Atuhaire, Felix Boos, Peter Ssekkadde, Sandra Abeine, Ruth Mubeezi, Samuel Fuhrimann
{"title":"Tool for identifying occupational exposures and risks in agriculture (TIERRA): application in coffee farming in Uganda.","authors":"Hannah Wey, Lena Jäggi, Aggrey Atuhaire, Felix Boos, Peter Ssekkadde, Sandra Abeine, Ruth Mubeezi, Samuel Fuhrimann","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2026.1609449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study developed a practical, context-sensitive assessment tool to prioritize occupational risks in agriculture (TIERRA). We applied TIERRA in a case study with smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda (FarmCoUganda) to demonstrate its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TIERRA follows a stepwise, participatory process beginning with an inventory of 80 occupational hazards, reviewed by local experts for clarity and prioritized by community stakeholders through a Delphi workshop. Participants rate the likelihood, severity, and risk of hazards. In the Ugandan case study, 31 stakeholders rated 59 hazards relevant to smallholder coffee farmers in Mbale District.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders prioritized 23 hazards across six categories: biological, chemical, ergonomic, and physical hazards, each comprising three items, plus five environmental and six psychosocial hazards. \"Contact with a pesticide\" received the highest overall risk score. \"Mosquito bites\" emerged as the most significant biological risk. Ergonomic hazards received the highest categorical risk rating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIERRA fosters stakeholder ownership and facilitates dialogue toward action. It supports the development of tailored farmer surveys, training and safer working conditions. It offers a methodological blueprint for adaptation across diverse agricultural contexts, including in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14322,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":"71 ","pages":"1609449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13329147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2026.1609449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study developed a practical, context-sensitive assessment tool to prioritize occupational risks in agriculture (TIERRA). We applied TIERRA in a case study with smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda (FarmCoUganda) to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Methods: TIERRA follows a stepwise, participatory process beginning with an inventory of 80 occupational hazards, reviewed by local experts for clarity and prioritized by community stakeholders through a Delphi workshop. Participants rate the likelihood, severity, and risk of hazards. In the Ugandan case study, 31 stakeholders rated 59 hazards relevant to smallholder coffee farmers in Mbale District.

Results: Stakeholders prioritized 23 hazards across six categories: biological, chemical, ergonomic, and physical hazards, each comprising three items, plus five environmental and six psychosocial hazards. "Contact with a pesticide" received the highest overall risk score. "Mosquito bites" emerged as the most significant biological risk. Ergonomic hazards received the highest categorical risk rating.

Conclusion: TIERRA fosters stakeholder ownership and facilitates dialogue toward action. It supports the development of tailored farmer surveys, training and safer working conditions. It offers a methodological blueprint for adaptation across diverse agricultural contexts, including in LMICs.

确定农业职业暴露和风险的工具(TIERRA):在乌干达咖啡种植中的应用。
目的:本研究开发了一种实用的、环境敏感的评估工具来确定农业职业风险的优先级(TIERRA)。我们将TIERRA应用于乌干达小农咖啡农(FarmCoUganda)的案例研究中,以证明其有效性。方法:TIERRA遵循一个循序渐进的参与式过程,首先是80种职业危害的清单,由当地专家进行审查以明确危害,并通过德尔菲研讨会由社区利益相关者确定优先顺序。参与者对危险的可能性、严重程度和风险进行评估。在乌干达的案例研究中,31个利益攸关方对与Mbale地区咖啡小农有关的59种危害进行了评级。结果:利益相关者优先考虑了六大类23种危害:生物、化学、人体工程学和物理危害,每种危害包括三个项目,外加五种环境危害和六种社会心理危害。“接触农药”的总体风险得分最高。“蚊虫叮咬”成为最重要的生物风险。人体工程学危害获得了最高的分类风险评级。结论:TIERRA促进了利益相关者的所有权,促进了对行动的对话。它支持开发量身定制的农民调查、培训和更安全的工作条件。它为包括中低收入国家在内的不同农业背景下的适应提供了方法论蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Public Health
International Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
269
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Health publishes scientific articles relevant to global public health, from different countries and cultures, and assembles them into issues that raise awareness and understanding of public health problems and solutions. The Journal welcomes submissions of original research, critical and relevant reviews, methodological papers and manuscripts that emphasize theoretical content. IJPH sometimes publishes commentaries and opinions. Special issues highlight key areas of current research. The Editorial Board''s mission is to provide a thoughtful forum for contemporary issues and challenges in global public health research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书