Hannah Wey, Lena Jäggi, Aggrey Atuhaire, Felix Boos, Peter Ssekkadde, Sandra Abeine, Ruth Mubeezi, Samuel Fuhrimann
{"title":"Tool for identifying occupational exposures and risks in agriculture (TIERRA): application in coffee farming in Uganda.","authors":"Hannah Wey, Lena Jäggi, Aggrey Atuhaire, Felix Boos, Peter Ssekkadde, Sandra Abeine, Ruth Mubeezi, Samuel Fuhrimann","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2026.1609449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study developed a practical, context-sensitive assessment tool to prioritize occupational risks in agriculture (TIERRA). We applied TIERRA in a case study with smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda (FarmCoUganda) to demonstrate its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TIERRA follows a stepwise, participatory process beginning with an inventory of 80 occupational hazards, reviewed by local experts for clarity and prioritized by community stakeholders through a Delphi workshop. Participants rate the likelihood, severity, and risk of hazards. In the Ugandan case study, 31 stakeholders rated 59 hazards relevant to smallholder coffee farmers in Mbale District.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders prioritized 23 hazards across six categories: biological, chemical, ergonomic, and physical hazards, each comprising three items, plus five environmental and six psychosocial hazards. \"Contact with a pesticide\" received the highest overall risk score. \"Mosquito bites\" emerged as the most significant biological risk. Ergonomic hazards received the highest categorical risk rating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIERRA fosters stakeholder ownership and facilitates dialogue toward action. It supports the development of tailored farmer surveys, training and safer working conditions. It offers a methodological blueprint for adaptation across diverse agricultural contexts, including in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14322,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":"71 ","pages":"1609449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13329147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2026.1609449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study developed a practical, context-sensitive assessment tool to prioritize occupational risks in agriculture (TIERRA). We applied TIERRA in a case study with smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda (FarmCoUganda) to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Methods: TIERRA follows a stepwise, participatory process beginning with an inventory of 80 occupational hazards, reviewed by local experts for clarity and prioritized by community stakeholders through a Delphi workshop. Participants rate the likelihood, severity, and risk of hazards. In the Ugandan case study, 31 stakeholders rated 59 hazards relevant to smallholder coffee farmers in Mbale District.
Results: Stakeholders prioritized 23 hazards across six categories: biological, chemical, ergonomic, and physical hazards, each comprising three items, plus five environmental and six psychosocial hazards. "Contact with a pesticide" received the highest overall risk score. "Mosquito bites" emerged as the most significant biological risk. Ergonomic hazards received the highest categorical risk rating.
Conclusion: TIERRA fosters stakeholder ownership and facilitates dialogue toward action. It supports the development of tailored farmer surveys, training and safer working conditions. It offers a methodological blueprint for adaptation across diverse agricultural contexts, including in LMICs.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Public Health publishes scientific articles relevant to global public health, from different countries and cultures, and assembles them into issues that raise awareness and understanding of public health problems and solutions. The Journal welcomes submissions of original research, critical and relevant reviews, methodological papers and manuscripts that emphasize theoretical content. IJPH sometimes publishes commentaries and opinions. Special issues highlight key areas of current research. The Editorial Board''s mission is to provide a thoughtful forum for contemporary issues and challenges in global public health research and practice.