Bedside Teaching and Feedback in Psychiatry: Using Open Dialogue Strategies on an Inpatient Psychotic Disorders Unit.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Harvard Review of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-06 DOI:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000472
Cordelia Ross, Adrienne T Gerken, Joseph B Stoklosa
{"title":"Bedside Teaching and Feedback in Psychiatry: Using Open Dialogue Strategies on an Inpatient Psychotic Disorders Unit.","authors":"Cordelia Ross, Adrienne T Gerken, Joseph B Stoklosa","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bedside teaching is essential to instilling clinical and communication skills, and its benefits to both learners and patients are particularly notable in psychiatry. Bedside rounding has declined in teaching hospitals, however, a trend that may reflect constraints on teaching and clinical time, perceived inefficiency, and awkwardness for trainees. Creating safe and nonpunitive learning environments, maximizing efficiency, and formatting rounds to support learners are strategies that may reduce these barriers. In this column, the authors describe using dialogic practice, a method of communication derived from Finland's Open Dialogue approach, to integrate bedside teaching into psychiatry inpatient rounds. This is the first description of dialogic practice as a teaching tool rather than a clinical approach. In this model, teaching is integrated directly into the patient interview. The attending psychiatrist may step in to make an intervention or teaching point, then hand the interview back to the trainee. The authors demonstrate this method using example cases. The use of dialogic practice, which incorporates multiple voices in each encounter, allows for integrating feedback and teaching into clinical care. Patients benefit by feeling fully included in discussions about their care, while learners receive valuable real-time feedback that they can immediately integrate into the ongoing interview. Dialogic teaching is highly efficient while modeling valuable skills and respecting both the patient and the learner. It must, however, be implemented in a psychologically safe learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12915,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"369-373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bedside teaching is essential to instilling clinical and communication skills, and its benefits to both learners and patients are particularly notable in psychiatry. Bedside rounding has declined in teaching hospitals, however, a trend that may reflect constraints on teaching and clinical time, perceived inefficiency, and awkwardness for trainees. Creating safe and nonpunitive learning environments, maximizing efficiency, and formatting rounds to support learners are strategies that may reduce these barriers. In this column, the authors describe using dialogic practice, a method of communication derived from Finland's Open Dialogue approach, to integrate bedside teaching into psychiatry inpatient rounds. This is the first description of dialogic practice as a teaching tool rather than a clinical approach. In this model, teaching is integrated directly into the patient interview. The attending psychiatrist may step in to make an intervention or teaching point, then hand the interview back to the trainee. The authors demonstrate this method using example cases. The use of dialogic practice, which incorporates multiple voices in each encounter, allows for integrating feedback and teaching into clinical care. Patients benefit by feeling fully included in discussions about their care, while learners receive valuable real-time feedback that they can immediately integrate into the ongoing interview. Dialogic teaching is highly efficient while modeling valuable skills and respecting both the patient and the learner. It must, however, be implemented in a psychologically safe learning environment.

精神病学的床边教学和反馈:在精神病住院病人中使用开放对话策略。
床边教学对于灌输临床和沟通技巧是必不可少的,它对学习者和患者的好处在精神病学中尤为显著。然而,教学医院的床边查房已经下降,这一趋势可能反映了教学和临床时间的限制、效率低下和实习生的尴尬。创造安全和非惩罚性的学习环境,最大限度地提高效率,并格式化回合来支持学习者是可能减少这些障碍的策略。在本专栏中,作者描述了使用对话实践,一种源自芬兰开放对话方法的交流方法,将床边教学融入精神病学住院查房。这是第一次描述对话练习作为一种教学工具,而不是临床方法。在这种模式下,教学直接融入到患者访谈中。主治精神病医生可能会介入,提出一个干预或教学点,然后把面试交还给学员。作者用实例对该方法进行了论证。使用对话练习,在每次接触中结合多种声音,允许将反馈和教学融入临床护理。患者受益于感觉完全被纳入关于他们的护理的讨论,而学习者得到宝贵的实时反馈,他们可以立即融入正在进行的面试。对话式教学是一种高效的教学方式,既能塑造有价值的技能,又能尊重患者和学习者。然而,它必须在心理安全的学习环境中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School''s Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书