Off-target anti-leukemic effects of antibiotics: mechanisms and therapeutic insights.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jason Charamis, Nikolaos Katzilakis, Eftichia Stiakaki, Ioannis Kyriakidis
{"title":"Off-target anti-leukemic effects of antibiotics: mechanisms and therapeutic insights.","authors":"Jason Charamis, Nikolaos Katzilakis, Eftichia Stiakaki, Ioannis Kyriakidis","doi":"10.1007/s00280-026-04916-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotics are among the transformative advances in medicine, but many interact with mammalian cellular targets and pathways beyond their antimicrobial activity. A clinically important expression of these off-target effects is hematologic toxicity, including immune-mediated cytopenias and direct bone marrow suppression. This narrative review examines whether the same biology that injures normal hematopoietic cells can, in selected contexts, reveal therapeutically exploitable vulnerabilities in leukemia. We synthesize molecular, clinical, and preclinical evidence and organize it into an integrative framework linking mitochondrial translation inhibition, mitonuclear imbalance, oxidative phosphorylation failure, reactive oxygen species generation, DNA/topoisomerase stress, autophagy and lysosomal-flux blockade, and apoptosis modulation with both hematotoxicity and antileukemic activity. The strongest preclinical evidence supports selected tetracyclines, macrolides, and oxazolidinones, whereas evidence for beta-lactams, glycopeptides, polymyxins, rifamycins, fluoroquinolones, and folate-pathway agents remains more limited or largely hypothesis-generating. Importantly, antibiotic-induced cytopenia should not be interpreted as proof of leukemia selectivity: immune-mediated toxicity, supratherapeutic in vitro exposure, normal progenitor injury, pharmacokinetic constraints, microbiome effects, and resistance mechanisms all narrow the translational window. Overall, antibiotic hematotoxicity is best viewed as a biologically informative signal that can guide mechanism-based repurposing and combination strategies, but clinical development requires rigorous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic validation, normal hematopoietic comparators, and biomarker-driven patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":9556,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13337810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-026-04916-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotics are among the transformative advances in medicine, but many interact with mammalian cellular targets and pathways beyond their antimicrobial activity. A clinically important expression of these off-target effects is hematologic toxicity, including immune-mediated cytopenias and direct bone marrow suppression. This narrative review examines whether the same biology that injures normal hematopoietic cells can, in selected contexts, reveal therapeutically exploitable vulnerabilities in leukemia. We synthesize molecular, clinical, and preclinical evidence and organize it into an integrative framework linking mitochondrial translation inhibition, mitonuclear imbalance, oxidative phosphorylation failure, reactive oxygen species generation, DNA/topoisomerase stress, autophagy and lysosomal-flux blockade, and apoptosis modulation with both hematotoxicity and antileukemic activity. The strongest preclinical evidence supports selected tetracyclines, macrolides, and oxazolidinones, whereas evidence for beta-lactams, glycopeptides, polymyxins, rifamycins, fluoroquinolones, and folate-pathway agents remains more limited or largely hypothesis-generating. Importantly, antibiotic-induced cytopenia should not be interpreted as proof of leukemia selectivity: immune-mediated toxicity, supratherapeutic in vitro exposure, normal progenitor injury, pharmacokinetic constraints, microbiome effects, and resistance mechanisms all narrow the translational window. Overall, antibiotic hematotoxicity is best viewed as a biologically informative signal that can guide mechanism-based repurposing and combination strategies, but clinical development requires rigorous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic validation, normal hematopoietic comparators, and biomarker-driven patient selection.

抗生素的脱靶抗白血病作用:机制和治疗见解。
抗生素是医学的变革性进步之一,但许多抗生素与哺乳动物细胞靶点和途径相互作用,超出了它们的抗菌活性。这些脱靶效应的一个重要临床表现是血液学毒性,包括免疫介导的细胞减少和直接骨髓抑制。这篇叙述性综述探讨了在特定情况下,损伤正常造血细胞的相同生物学是否可以揭示白血病治疗上可利用的脆弱性。我们综合了分子、临床和临床前证据,并将其组织成一个整合的框架,将线粒体翻译抑制、有丝分裂核失衡、氧化磷酸化失败、活性氧生成、DNA/拓扑异构酶应激、自噬和溶酶体通量阻断、细胞凋亡调节与血液毒性和抗白血病活性联系起来。最有力的临床前证据支持选定的四环素类、大环内酯类和恶唑烷酮类,而β -内酰胺类、糖肽类、多粘菌素类、利福霉素类、氟喹诺酮类和叶酸途径药物的证据仍然有限或主要是假设。重要的是,抗生素诱导的细胞减少不应被解释为白血病选择性的证据:免疫介导的毒性、体外超治疗暴露、正常祖细胞损伤、药代动力学限制、微生物组效应和耐药机制都缩小了翻译窗口。总的来说,抗生素血液毒性最好被视为一种生物学信息信号,可以指导基于机制的重新利用和联合策略,但临床开发需要严格的药代动力学/药效学验证,正常的造血比较物和生物标志物驱动的患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Addressing a wide range of pharmacologic and oncologic concerns on both experimental and clinical levels, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology is an eminent journal in the field. The primary focus in this rapid publication medium is on new anticancer agents, their experimental screening, preclinical toxicology and pharmacology, single and combined drug administration modalities, and clinical phase I, II and III trials. It is essential reading for pharmacologists and oncologists giving results recorded in the following areas: clinical toxicology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and indications for chemotherapy in cancer treatment strategy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书