A randomized controlled trial of electrical cardiometry-guided perioperative hemodynamic management in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-25 DOI:10.4103/apc.apc_21_26
Rohan S Thottan, Sambhunath Das, Neeti Makhija, Suruchi Hasija, Sandeep Chauhan
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of electrical cardiometry-guided perioperative hemodynamic management in children undergoing cardiac surgery.","authors":"Rohan S Thottan, Sambhunath Das, Neeti Makhija, Suruchi Hasija, Sandeep Chauhan","doi":"10.4103/apc.apc_21_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Children undergoing corrective surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of perioperative hemodynamic instability and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). Conventional monitoring relies on static parameters that may inadequately reflect real-time cardiac performance. Electrical cardiometry (EC) provides continuous, noninvasive assessment of cardiac output and related indices. This study evaluated whether EC-guided perioperative management improves early postoperative outcomes compared with conventional monitoring in pediatric CHD surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 children (0-15 years) undergoing elective corrective CHD surgery were randomized to EC-guided management (Group 1, <i>n</i> = 30) or conventional monitoring (Group 2, <i>n</i> = 30). In Group 1, perioperative fluid and vasoactive therapy were guided by EC-derived parameters, including cardiac index (CI), stroke volume, thoracic fluid content, and stroke volume variation. Group 2 was managed using standard clinical and invasive parameters. The primary outcome was the incidence of LCOS within 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), major adverse cardiac events, and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable. Group 1 demonstrated significantly higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 8, 16, and 24 h postoperatively, faster lactate clearance, and lower VIS during the early postoperative period. CI correlated positively with MAP and urine output and inversely with lactate levels. No mortality occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EC-guided perioperative management aids in achieving early postoperative hemodynamic stability and metabolic recovery in children undergoing corrective CHD surgery and represents a valuable noninvasive adjunct to conventional monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":8026,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","volume":"19 2","pages":"139-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_21_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Children undergoing corrective surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of perioperative hemodynamic instability and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). Conventional monitoring relies on static parameters that may inadequately reflect real-time cardiac performance. Electrical cardiometry (EC) provides continuous, noninvasive assessment of cardiac output and related indices. This study evaluated whether EC-guided perioperative management improves early postoperative outcomes compared with conventional monitoring in pediatric CHD surgery.

Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 children (0-15 years) undergoing elective corrective CHD surgery were randomized to EC-guided management (Group 1, n = 30) or conventional monitoring (Group 2, n = 30). In Group 1, perioperative fluid and vasoactive therapy were guided by EC-derived parameters, including cardiac index (CI), stroke volume, thoracic fluid content, and stroke volume variation. Group 2 was managed using standard clinical and invasive parameters. The primary outcome was the incidence of LCOS within 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), major adverse cardiac events, and in-hospital mortality.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Group 1 demonstrated significantly higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 8, 16, and 24 h postoperatively, faster lactate clearance, and lower VIS during the early postoperative period. CI correlated positively with MAP and urine output and inversely with lactate levels. No mortality occurred.

Conclusions: EC-guided perioperative management aids in achieving early postoperative hemodynamic stability and metabolic recovery in children undergoing corrective CHD surgery and represents a valuable noninvasive adjunct to conventional monitoring.

心电测量引导下儿童心脏手术围手术期血流动力学管理的随机对照试验。
背景和目的:接受先天性心脏病(CHD)矫正手术的儿童存在围手术期血流动力学不稳定和低心输出量综合征(LCOS)的风险。传统的监测依赖于静态参数,可能不能充分反映实时心脏表现。心电测量(EC)提供连续的,无创的评估心输出量和相关指标。本研究评估了与常规监测相比,ec引导的围手术期管理是否能改善儿童冠心病手术的早期预后。方法:在本前瞻性随机对照试验中,60例(0-15岁)接受选择性冠心病矫正手术的儿童随机分为ec引导管理组(组1,n = 30)和常规监测组(组2,n = 30)。在第1组中,围手术期液体和血管活性治疗以ec衍生参数为指导,包括心脏指数(CI)、脑卒中容量、胸腔液体含量和脑卒中容量变化。第二组采用标准临床和侵入性参数。主要观察指标为术后48 h内LCOS的发生率。次要结局包括血管活性肌力评分(VIS)、主要心脏不良事件和住院死亡率。结果:基线特征可比较。1组术后8、16、24小时平均动脉压(MAP)明显升高,乳酸清除率加快,术后早期VIS较低。CI与MAP和尿量呈正相关,与乳酸水平呈负相关。无死亡发生。结论:心电图引导的围手术期管理有助于儿童冠心病矫正手术后早期血流动力学稳定和代谢恢复,是传统监测的一种有价值的无创辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书