Assessing the risk of drug-induced corrected QT interval prolongation in primary care.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Divya Garg, Vishal S Bhella, Trudy Huyghebaert
{"title":"Assessing the risk of drug-induced corrected QT interval prolongation in primary care.","authors":"Divya Garg, Vishal S Bhella, Trudy Huyghebaert","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmag048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tisdale risk score has been validated for predicting drug-induced QTc prolongation (QTP) in cardiac care. This study aims to determine whether it can guide prescribing and monitoring of QTc-prolonging medications in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart audit using Tisdale Risk Score was conducted. Data from 486 primary care patients from two Family Medicine Clinics, prescribed medications with known or possible risk of Torsades de Pointes (TdP) were reviewed. Eighty-five patients with pre- and post-pharmacotherapy ECGs comprised the cases. A control group of 184 patients not on QTc-prolonging medications was assessed. Patients were categorized as low, moderate, or high risk for QTP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychotropics were the most frequently prescribed QTc-prolonging medications. Baseline QTc did not differ significantly between cases (428 ms) and controls (426 ms). Among cases, most were stratified as low risk (69.4%), with fewer in moderate (25.9%) and high-risk (4.7%) categories. Comparatively, 99.5% of control patients were at low risk. QTc prolongation occurred in 5/85 (5.9%) post-pharmacotherapy, with none in the high-risk category. Odds ratio for QTP in moderate-risk patients versus low-risk was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.07-6.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most primary care patients were at low risk for drug-induced QTc prolongation. QTP events were low with none in the high-risk category, which limited evaluation of association between risk categories and QTc prolongation. The study highlights commonly prescribed QTc-prolonging medications in family medicine and their variable QTc effects, emphasizing the need for an outpatient-tailored risk assessment tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13332750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmag048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tisdale risk score has been validated for predicting drug-induced QTc prolongation (QTP) in cardiac care. This study aims to determine whether it can guide prescribing and monitoring of QTc-prolonging medications in primary care.

Methods: A retrospective chart audit using Tisdale Risk Score was conducted. Data from 486 primary care patients from two Family Medicine Clinics, prescribed medications with known or possible risk of Torsades de Pointes (TdP) were reviewed. Eighty-five patients with pre- and post-pharmacotherapy ECGs comprised the cases. A control group of 184 patients not on QTc-prolonging medications was assessed. Patients were categorized as low, moderate, or high risk for QTP.

Results: Psychotropics were the most frequently prescribed QTc-prolonging medications. Baseline QTc did not differ significantly between cases (428 ms) and controls (426 ms). Among cases, most were stratified as low risk (69.4%), with fewer in moderate (25.9%) and high-risk (4.7%) categories. Comparatively, 99.5% of control patients were at low risk. QTc prolongation occurred in 5/85 (5.9%) post-pharmacotherapy, with none in the high-risk category. Odds ratio for QTP in moderate-risk patients versus low-risk was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.07-6.98).

Conclusions: Most primary care patients were at low risk for drug-induced QTc prolongation. QTP events were low with none in the high-risk category, which limited evaluation of association between risk categories and QTc prolongation. The study highlights commonly prescribed QTc-prolonging medications in family medicine and their variable QTc effects, emphasizing the need for an outpatient-tailored risk assessment tool.

评估初级保健中药物诱导的纠正QT间期延长的风险。
背景:Tisdale风险评分已被证实可用于预测心脏护理中药物性QTc延长(QTP)。本研究旨在确定它是否可以指导初级保健中延长qtc药物的处方和监测。方法:采用Tisdale风险评分法进行回顾性图表审核。来自两家家庭医学诊所的486名初级保健患者的数据,以及已知或可能存在足跖关节畸形(TdP)风险的处方药。85例患者在药物治疗前和药物治疗后进行心电图检查。184名未服用延长qtc药物的患者作为对照组。患者被分为低、中、高风险QTP。结果:精神类药物是最常用的延长qtc的药物。基线QTc在病例(428 ms)和对照组(426 ms)之间没有显著差异。在病例中,大多数被划分为低风险(69.4%),少量被划分为中度(25.9%)和高风险(4.7%)。而对照组的低危率为99.5%。药物治疗后5/85(5.9%)患者QTc延长,高危患者无QTc延长。中危患者与低危患者QTP的优势比为0.71 (95% CI: 0.07-6.98)。结论:大多数初级保健患者药物性QTc延长的风险较低。QTP事件较低,在高风险类别中没有发生,这限制了评估风险类别与QTc延长之间的关系。该研究强调了家庭医学中常用的延长QTc的药物及其可变的QTc效果,强调需要一种针对门诊患者的风险评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书