Machine learning–based seismic resilience optimization and rapid assessment of reinforced cement concrete bridge

Q2 Engineering
Ujwala S. Ghodeswar, Pranita S. Bhandari, Yogesh S. Lanjewar, Shradhesh Marve, Pranali Dandekar, Lowlesh N. Yadav, Latika Pinjarkar, Nikita Hatwar
{"title":"Machine learning–based seismic resilience optimization and rapid assessment of reinforced cement concrete bridge","authors":"Ujwala S. Ghodeswar,&nbsp;Pranita S. Bhandari,&nbsp;Yogesh S. Lanjewar,&nbsp;Shradhesh Marve,&nbsp;Pranali Dandekar,&nbsp;Lowlesh N. Yadav,&nbsp;Latika Pinjarkar,&nbsp;Nikita Hatwar","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01685-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>After an earthquake, resilient transportation planners must estimate reinforced cement concrete bridge structural safety, recovery time, economic losses, and long-term sustainability under tight time and data restrictions. Traditional seismic assessment frameworks use nonlinear time-history analysis, simplified fragility curves, and unconnected loss or life-cycle models, which increase computational cost, fragment uncertainty treatment, resilience, cost, and environmental performance optimization. Current machine learning methods are faster but disregard system-level interconnections, recovery dynamics, and sustainability implications, restricting their application for policy-level decision-making. To address these limits, this study provides a unified machine learning–based prediction and optimization method for rapid RCC bridge seismic resistance, post-earthquake losses, and sustainability metrics assessment. The six-block analytical process ensures data continuity. First, a SeisBridge Diffusion Surrogate (SB-DS) imitates nonlinear seismic response utilizing graph-based structural representations and conditional diffusion models to reliably and uncertainty-awarely estimate engineering demand parameters at low computational Second, topology-aware message transmission utilizing a Graph Fragility and Damage Inference Network (G-FraDIN) translates these demands into component- and system-level damage state probabilities, surpassing standalone component fragility models. Third, for risk assessment, a Recovery–Loss Multi-Task Emulator with Conformal Uncertainty (ReLo-ConfMT) predicts repair time, direct and indirect losses, and functionality trajectories with statistically calibrated prediction interval Fourth, the hybrid ML–LCA HyLiSE-Bridge life-cycle carbon and energy estimates include seismic damage and repair trajectories. Fifth, a Resilience–Loss–Sustainability Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizer (ReLoS-MOBO) discovers Pareto-optimal bridge designs and retrofits that balance resilience, economic risk, and environmental performance The Scenario-Consistent Policy Evaluator with Explainable Learning (SCOPE-XL) finds robust design solutions under stakeholder requirements and openly interprets key design drivers. The proposed paradigm decreases computational effort by orders of magnitude, improves prediction accuracy and uncertainty consistency, and offers resilience–sustainability trade-offs. Its integrated and interpretable nature aids emergency response planning, infrastructure investment, and sustainable bridge earthquake designs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 7","pages":"3593 - 3609"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01685-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After an earthquake, resilient transportation planners must estimate reinforced cement concrete bridge structural safety, recovery time, economic losses, and long-term sustainability under tight time and data restrictions. Traditional seismic assessment frameworks use nonlinear time-history analysis, simplified fragility curves, and unconnected loss or life-cycle models, which increase computational cost, fragment uncertainty treatment, resilience, cost, and environmental performance optimization. Current machine learning methods are faster but disregard system-level interconnections, recovery dynamics, and sustainability implications, restricting their application for policy-level decision-making. To address these limits, this study provides a unified machine learning–based prediction and optimization method for rapid RCC bridge seismic resistance, post-earthquake losses, and sustainability metrics assessment. The six-block analytical process ensures data continuity. First, a SeisBridge Diffusion Surrogate (SB-DS) imitates nonlinear seismic response utilizing graph-based structural representations and conditional diffusion models to reliably and uncertainty-awarely estimate engineering demand parameters at low computational Second, topology-aware message transmission utilizing a Graph Fragility and Damage Inference Network (G-FraDIN) translates these demands into component- and system-level damage state probabilities, surpassing standalone component fragility models. Third, for risk assessment, a Recovery–Loss Multi-Task Emulator with Conformal Uncertainty (ReLo-ConfMT) predicts repair time, direct and indirect losses, and functionality trajectories with statistically calibrated prediction interval Fourth, the hybrid ML–LCA HyLiSE-Bridge life-cycle carbon and energy estimates include seismic damage and repair trajectories. Fifth, a Resilience–Loss–Sustainability Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizer (ReLoS-MOBO) discovers Pareto-optimal bridge designs and retrofits that balance resilience, economic risk, and environmental performance The Scenario-Consistent Policy Evaluator with Explainable Learning (SCOPE-XL) finds robust design solutions under stakeholder requirements and openly interprets key design drivers. The proposed paradigm decreases computational effort by orders of magnitude, improves prediction accuracy and uncertainty consistency, and offers resilience–sustainability trade-offs. Its integrated and interpretable nature aids emergency response planning, infrastructure investment, and sustainable bridge earthquake designs.

基于机器学习的钢筋水泥混凝土桥梁抗震弹性优化与快速评估
地震后,弹性交通规划者必须在紧迫的时间和数据限制下评估钢筋水泥混凝土桥梁结构的安全性、恢复时间、经济损失和长期可持续性。传统的地震评估框架使用非线性时程分析、简化的易损性曲线和未连接的损失或生命周期模型,这增加了计算成本、碎片不确定性处理、恢复力、成本和环境性能优化。目前的机器学习方法更快,但忽略了系统级互连、恢复动态和可持续性影响,限制了它们在政策级决策中的应用。为了解决这些限制,本研究提供了一种统一的基于机器学习的预测和优化方法,用于快速评估碾压混凝土桥梁的抗震性能、震后损失和可持续性指标。6块分析过程保证了数据的连续性。首先,地震桥扩散代理(SB-DS)利用基于图的结构表示和条件扩散模型模拟非线性地震反应,以低计算量可靠且不确定地估计工程需求参数。其次,利用图脆弱性和损伤推理网络(G-FraDIN)的拓扑感知消息传输将这些需求转换为组件和系统级的损坏状态概率。超越独立组件脆弱性模型。第三,对于风险评估,具有保形不确定性的恢复损失多任务模拟器(ReLo-ConfMT)预测修复时间,直接和间接损失,以及具有统计校准预测区间的功能轨迹。第四,混合ML-LCA HyLiSE-Bridge生命周期碳和能源估计包括地震破坏和修复轨迹。第五,弹性-损失-可持续性多目标贝叶斯优化器(ReLoS-MOBO)发现平衡弹性、经济风险和环境绩效的帕累托最优桥梁设计和改造。具有可解释学习的情景一致性政策评估器(SCOPE-XL)在利益相关者的要求下找到稳健的设计解决方案,并公开解释关键的设计驱动因素。所提出的范式减少了数量级的计算工作量,提高了预测准确性和不确定性一致性,并提供了弹性-可持续性的权衡。其综合和可解释的性质有助于应急响应规划、基础设施投资和可持续桥梁抗震设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书