Comparative analysis of response of BI building with varying post yield stiffness ratio under NF and FF ground motion

Q2 Engineering
Jitendra Gudainiyan
{"title":"Comparative analysis of response of BI building with varying post yield stiffness ratio under NF and FF ground motion","authors":"Jitendra Gudainiyan","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01684-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study aims to examine the performance a base-isolated (BI) building with varying post-yield stiffness ratio (PYSR) to near-field (NF) and far-field (FF) ground motion in scaled and unscaled forms. The PYSR was varied as 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.20. The ground motions were scaled to Zone IV as per IS 1893: 2016 (Part 1). Time history analysis was performed for various cases of the building and responses- storey displacement, IDR, storey acceleration and base shear were determined. It was found in the study that Lower PYSR (0.05) provides maximum isolation efficiency with minimum base shear and IDR and higher energy dissipation, but results in greater displacement demand. Higher PYSR values (0.20–0.25) increase force transmission with only marginal improvement in acceleration control, showing diminishing benefits beyond PYSR 0.15–0.20. NF ground motions produced higher force, and displacement demands due to pulse-type effects, making them critical for displacement-based design, whereas FF motions exhibited smoother responses and greater sensitivity to PYSR variation. An optimal PYSR range of 0.10–0.15 was found for NF ground motions while 0.10–0.20 was found to be suitable for FF ground motions, ensuring a balanced displacement control, force reduction, and energy dissipation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 7","pages":"3577 - 3591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01684-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the performance a base-isolated (BI) building with varying post-yield stiffness ratio (PYSR) to near-field (NF) and far-field (FF) ground motion in scaled and unscaled forms. The PYSR was varied as 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.20. The ground motions were scaled to Zone IV as per IS 1893: 2016 (Part 1). Time history analysis was performed for various cases of the building and responses- storey displacement, IDR, storey acceleration and base shear were determined. It was found in the study that Lower PYSR (0.05) provides maximum isolation efficiency with minimum base shear and IDR and higher energy dissipation, but results in greater displacement demand. Higher PYSR values (0.20–0.25) increase force transmission with only marginal improvement in acceleration control, showing diminishing benefits beyond PYSR 0.15–0.20. NF ground motions produced higher force, and displacement demands due to pulse-type effects, making them critical for displacement-based design, whereas FF motions exhibited smoother responses and greater sensitivity to PYSR variation. An optimal PYSR range of 0.10–0.15 was found for NF ground motions while 0.10–0.20 was found to be suitable for FF ground motions, ensuring a balanced displacement control, force reduction, and energy dissipation.

Abstract Image

不同后屈服刚度比的BI建筑在NF和FF地震动下的响应对比分析
本研究旨在研究不同屈服后刚度比(PYSR)对近场(NF)和远场(FF)地面运动在比例和非比例形式下的性能。PYSR分别为0.05、0.10、0.15、0.20、0.20。根据IS 1893: 2016(第1部分),地面运动被缩放到IV区。对不同情况下的建筑物进行了时程分析和响应——层位移、内阻、层加速度和基底剪力。研究发现,PYSR(0.05)越低,隔震效率越高,基底剪切和IDR越小,耗能越高,但位移需求越大。更高的PYSR值(0.20-0.25)增加了力传递,但加速度控制只有边际改善,超过PYSR 0.15-0.20的好处逐渐减少。由于脉冲效应,NF地面运动产生更高的力和位移需求,使其成为基于位移的设计的关键,而FF运动表现出更平滑的响应和对PYSR变化的更大敏感性。NF地震动的最佳PYSR范围为0.10 ~ 0.15,FF地震动的最佳PYSR范围为0.10 ~ 0.20,从而保证了位移控制、减力和耗能的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书