Comparative study of interstitial brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy as tumour bed boost after conservative surgery for breast cancer: Toxicity and cosmetic outcomes

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Radiotherapie Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-03 DOI:10.1016/j.canrad.2026.104834
Ankita Pandey, Uday Pratap Shahi, Laxman Pandey, Shreya Singh, Lalit Mohan Aggarwal, Ritusha Mishra, Himanshu Mishra
{"title":"Comparative study of interstitial brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy as tumour bed boost after conservative surgery for breast cancer: Toxicity and cosmetic outcomes","authors":"Ankita Pandey,&nbsp;Uday Pratap Shahi,&nbsp;Laxman Pandey,&nbsp;Shreya Singh,&nbsp;Lalit Mohan Aggarwal,&nbsp;Ritusha Mishra,&nbsp;Himanshu Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2026.104834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Radiotherapy improves survival of patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Tumour bed boost further improves the local control that can be delivered by interstitial brachytherapy, electron beam or X-ray photon beam therapy (external beam radiotherapy). The aim of the study was to compare cosmetic outcome and the factors affecting it after interstitial brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Sixty patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma who underwent breast conserving surgery were prospectively enrolled and treated by electron or X-ray photon beams to a total dose of 40<!--> <!-->Gy delivered in 15 fractions followed by tumour bed boost by interstitial brachytherapy (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->30) or external beam radiotherapy (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->30) to a dose of 14<!--> <!-->Gy delivered in four fractions. Both the groups were compared in terms of cosmesis, acute toxicity, late toxicity, dosimetry and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median follow up period of the cohort was 56 months (range: 50–63<!--> <!-->months). There was no significant difference in the two groups in terms of toxicity and cosmetic outcome. Excellent/good cosmesis was seen in 85 % of total patients. Late skin toxicity was significantly lower in the group receiving interstitial brachytherapy. Doses to the normal structures such as heart and skin were significantly lower in patients who had brachytherapy. Using univariate analysis, tumour location (central region), use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, vertical nipple deviation of more than 2<!--> <!-->cm and grade 3 skin induration were found to be significantly associated with fair/poor cosmetic outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Tumour bed boost by external beam radiotherapy or interstitial brachytherapy provide equivalent result in terms of cosmesis. Interstitial brachytherapy has an edge over external beam radiotherapy in reducing skin doses resulting in decreased incidence of higher grade of late skin toxicity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9504,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Radiotherapie","volume":"30 3","pages":"Article 104834"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Radiotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321826000375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Radiotherapy improves survival of patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Tumour bed boost further improves the local control that can be delivered by interstitial brachytherapy, electron beam or X-ray photon beam therapy (external beam radiotherapy). The aim of the study was to compare cosmetic outcome and the factors affecting it after interstitial brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

Sixty patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma who underwent breast conserving surgery were prospectively enrolled and treated by electron or X-ray photon beams to a total dose of 40 Gy delivered in 15 fractions followed by tumour bed boost by interstitial brachytherapy (n = 30) or external beam radiotherapy (n = 30) to a dose of 14 Gy delivered in four fractions. Both the groups were compared in terms of cosmesis, acute toxicity, late toxicity, dosimetry and survival.

Results

Median follow up period of the cohort was 56 months (range: 50–63 months). There was no significant difference in the two groups in terms of toxicity and cosmetic outcome. Excellent/good cosmesis was seen in 85 % of total patients. Late skin toxicity was significantly lower in the group receiving interstitial brachytherapy. Doses to the normal structures such as heart and skin were significantly lower in patients who had brachytherapy. Using univariate analysis, tumour location (central region), use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, vertical nipple deviation of more than 2 cm and grade 3 skin induration were found to be significantly associated with fair/poor cosmetic outcome.

Conclusion

Tumour bed boost by external beam radiotherapy or interstitial brachytherapy provide equivalent result in terms of cosmesis. Interstitial brachytherapy has an edge over external beam radiotherapy in reducing skin doses resulting in decreased incidence of higher grade of late skin toxicity.
乳腺癌保守手术后间质近距离放疗与调强放疗作为肿瘤床增强的比较研究:毒性和美容效果。
导读:放疗可提高保乳手术患者的生存率。肿瘤床增强进一步改善了局部控制,可以通过间质近距离治疗、电子束或x射线光子束治疗(外束放疗)来实现。本研究的目的是比较间质性近距离放疗和外束放疗后的美容效果和影响美容效果的因素。材料和方法:前瞻性纳入60例行保乳手术的浸润性导管癌患者,采用电子或x射线光子束治疗,总剂量为40Gy,分15次传递,然后采用间质近距离放疗(n=30)或外束放疗(n=30),总剂量为14Gy,分4次传递。比较两组患者的美容效果、急性毒性、晚期毒性、剂量学和生存率。结果:队列中位随访时间为56个月(范围:50-63个月)。两组在毒性和美容效果方面没有显著差异。85%的患者有良好的美容效果。接受间质性近距离放疗组的晚期皮肤毒性明显降低。在接受近距离放射治疗的患者中,对心脏和皮肤等正常结构的剂量明显较低。通过单因素分析,发现肿瘤位置(中心区域)、新辅助化疗的使用、乳头垂直偏差超过2cm和3级皮肤硬化与美容效果的好坏显著相关。结论:外束放疗与间质近距离放疗对肿瘤床的增强效果相当。间质性近距离放射治疗在减少皮肤剂量方面比外部放射治疗有优势,从而降低较高级别晚期皮肤毒性的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Radiotherapie
Cancer Radiotherapie 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
23.10%
发文量
129
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Cancer/radiothérapie se veut d''abord et avant tout un organe francophone de publication des travaux de recherche en radiothérapie. La revue a pour objectif de diffuser les informations majeures sur les travaux de recherche en cancérologie et tout ce qui touche de près ou de loin au traitement du cancer par les radiations : technologie, radiophysique, radiobiologie et radiothérapie clinique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书