Awareness and preparedness for local anesthetic systemic toxicity among surgical clinicians: a multi-center cross-sectional survey study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Rasim Onur Karaoglu, Acelya Toprak Karaoglu, Sezen Kumas Solak, Mehmet Salih Sevdi, Serdar Demirgan
{"title":"Awareness and preparedness for local anesthetic systemic toxicity among surgical clinicians: a multi-center cross-sectional survey study.","authors":"Rasim Onur Karaoglu, Acelya Toprak Karaoglu, Sezen Kumas Solak, Mehmet Salih Sevdi, Serdar Demirgan","doi":"10.1186/s12871-026-04073-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of regional anesthesia and local anesthetic infiltration. Despite established treatment protocols, the extent of clinician awareness and institutional preparedness across surgical specialties remains poorly characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study enrolled 192 physicians from eight surgical specialties across five tertiary-level training and research hospitals in Türkiye (April-May 2025). A validated, structured questionnaire assessed LAST knowledge, clinical practices, and institutional readiness. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of correct lipid emulsion dosing knowledge, adjusting for specialty, seniority, and training status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 41.1% of participants had received formal LAST training. Correct identification of the recommended lipid emulsion bolus dose (1.5 mL/kg) was reported by 34.4% overall, rising to 58.2% among trained participants versus 18.1% among untrained participants (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, formal training (OR 6.38; 95% CI 3.21-12.68), anesthesiology specialty (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.67-5.91), and senior academic title (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.08-3.96) were independent predictors of correct dose knowledge. Early symptom recognition was reported by 49.5%. Aspiration before injection was performed consistently by 53.1%, and ultrasound guidance by 38.5%. Lipid emulsion was readily available in only 29.2% of departments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant gaps exist in LAST knowledge, preventive practices, and institutional preparedness across surgical specialties. Targeted simulation-based education, mandatory availability of lipid emulsion, and standardized institutional protocols are warranted to improve patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13602573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04073-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of regional anesthesia and local anesthetic infiltration. Despite established treatment protocols, the extent of clinician awareness and institutional preparedness across surgical specialties remains poorly characterized.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study enrolled 192 physicians from eight surgical specialties across five tertiary-level training and research hospitals in Türkiye (April-May 2025). A validated, structured questionnaire assessed LAST knowledge, clinical practices, and institutional readiness. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of correct lipid emulsion dosing knowledge, adjusting for specialty, seniority, and training status.

Results: Only 41.1% of participants had received formal LAST training. Correct identification of the recommended lipid emulsion bolus dose (1.5 mL/kg) was reported by 34.4% overall, rising to 58.2% among trained participants versus 18.1% among untrained participants (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, formal training (OR 6.38; 95% CI 3.21-12.68), anesthesiology specialty (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.67-5.91), and senior academic title (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.08-3.96) were independent predictors of correct dose knowledge. Early symptom recognition was reported by 49.5%. Aspiration before injection was performed consistently by 53.1%, and ultrasound guidance by 38.5%. Lipid emulsion was readily available in only 29.2% of departments.

Conclusion: Significant gaps exist in LAST knowledge, preventive practices, and institutional preparedness across surgical specialties. Targeted simulation-based education, mandatory availability of lipid emulsion, and standardized institutional protocols are warranted to improve patient safety.

外科临床医生对局麻全身毒性的认识和准备:一项多中心横断面调查研究。
背景:局麻全身毒性(LAST)是一种罕见但可能致命的区域麻醉和局麻浸润并发症。尽管建立了治疗方案,临床医生的意识和机构准备跨外科专科的程度仍然很差。方法:这项描述性横断面研究纳入了来自 kiye 5家三级培训和研究型医院的8个外科专科的192名医生(2025年4月- 5月)。经过验证的结构化问卷评估了LAST知识、临床实践和机构准备情况。多变量逻辑回归确定了正确的脂质乳剂量知识的独立预测因子,调整了专业,资历和培训状态。结果:仅有41.1%的参与者接受过正式的LAST培训。正确识别推荐的脂质乳丸剂量(1.5 mL/kg)的比例为34.4%,在接受过培训的参与者中上升到58.2%,而在未接受过培训的参与者中上升到18.1% (p结论:在LAST知识、预防实践和机构准备方面存在显著差距。有针对性的基于模拟的教育,强制性脂质乳剂的可用性和标准化的机构协议是必要的,以提高患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书