Development of a predictive model for postoperative body mass index and diabetes outcomes after metabolic bariatric surgery: retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2026-07-03 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrag054
Vincent Ochs, Lars Kollmann, Ilan Rosenblum, Adisa Poljo, Andreas Heule, Bassey Enodien, Maryna Chumakova-Orin, Eric J DeMaria, Emanuel Burri, Reinhard Stoll, Otto Kollmar, Robert Rosenberg, Pascal Probst, Markus K Muller, Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz, Beat P Müller, Daniel M Frey, Piotr Kalinowski, Marta Przybysz, Mateusz Bartkowiak, Muhammed Said Dalkilic, Abdullah Sisik, Rodrigo Otavio Carvalho De Oliveria, Fatima Martins, Erik Stenberg, Ellen Andersson, Torsten Olbers, Sven Flemming, Florian Seyfried, Florian Ponholzer, Annemarie Weissenbacher, Dietmar Öfner, Johanna Betzler, Mirko Otto, Ralph Peterli, Philippe C Cattin, Anas Taha
{"title":"Development of a predictive model for postoperative body mass index and diabetes outcomes after metabolic bariatric surgery: retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Vincent Ochs, Lars Kollmann, Ilan Rosenblum, Adisa Poljo, Andreas Heule, Bassey Enodien, Maryna Chumakova-Orin, Eric J DeMaria, Emanuel Burri, Reinhard Stoll, Otto Kollmar, Robert Rosenberg, Pascal Probst, Markus K Muller, Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz, Beat P Müller, Daniel M Frey, Piotr Kalinowski, Marta Przybysz, Mateusz Bartkowiak, Muhammed Said Dalkilic, Abdullah Sisik, Rodrigo Otavio Carvalho De Oliveria, Fatima Martins, Erik Stenberg, Ellen Andersson, Torsten Olbers, Sven Flemming, Florian Seyfried, Florian Ponholzer, Annemarie Weissenbacher, Dietmar Öfner, Johanna Betzler, Mirko Otto, Ralph Peterli, Philippe C Cattin, Anas Taha","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrag054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting postoperative body mass index (BMI) trajectories and long-term type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission after bariatric surgery remains challenging. Existing models often rely on baseline variables only and fail to incorporate dynamic postoperative changes. This study aimed to develop and validate a multicentre machine-learning framework that predicts individualized BMI trajectories and T2D remission using routinely available preoperative data and time-dependent weight evolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy across 11 European centres (2012-2023). Variables with > 30% missing data were excluded; remaining missing values were imputed iteratively. A two-stage approach was used: a regression model predicting postoperative BMI at 3-60 months using an autoregressive design; and a classification model predicting T2D remission using baseline features and predicted BMI trajectories. Internal performance was evaluated with ten-fold and leave-one-clinic-out cross-validation; external validation used an independent cohort from Linköping, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11 457 patients initially identified, 9652 patients with complete baseline and follow-up information were used for the analysis. The best BMI model (HistGradientBoosting) achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.11 kg/m2 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.14) and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.62 kg/m2 across clinics; external testing showed an RMSE of 1.12 kg/m2 (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.12) and an MAE of 0.63 kg/m2. The T2D remission classifier (XGBoost) obtained a Macro F1 score of 0.88 (precision 0.87, recall 0.88), with an external F1 score of 0.89. Incorporating predicted BMI trajectories improved discrimination compared with baseline-only models (C-index 0.95 versus 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A two-stage machine-learning framework has high predictive performance for postoperative BMI and T2D remission up to 5 years after bariatric surgery. Dynamic incorporation of predicted weight trajectories enhances metabolic risk prediction and supports individualized counselling and postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrag054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting postoperative body mass index (BMI) trajectories and long-term type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission after bariatric surgery remains challenging. Existing models often rely on baseline variables only and fail to incorporate dynamic postoperative changes. This study aimed to develop and validate a multicentre machine-learning framework that predicts individualized BMI trajectories and T2D remission using routinely available preoperative data and time-dependent weight evolution.

Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy across 11 European centres (2012-2023). Variables with > 30% missing data were excluded; remaining missing values were imputed iteratively. A two-stage approach was used: a regression model predicting postoperative BMI at 3-60 months using an autoregressive design; and a classification model predicting T2D remission using baseline features and predicted BMI trajectories. Internal performance was evaluated with ten-fold and leave-one-clinic-out cross-validation; external validation used an independent cohort from Linköping, Sweden.

Results: Of the 11 457 patients initially identified, 9652 patients with complete baseline and follow-up information were used for the analysis. The best BMI model (HistGradientBoosting) achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.11 kg/m2 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.14) and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.62 kg/m2 across clinics; external testing showed an RMSE of 1.12 kg/m2 (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.12) and an MAE of 0.63 kg/m2. The T2D remission classifier (XGBoost) obtained a Macro F1 score of 0.88 (precision 0.87, recall 0.88), with an external F1 score of 0.89. Incorporating predicted BMI trajectories improved discrimination compared with baseline-only models (C-index 0.95 versus 0.93).

Conclusion: A two-stage machine-learning framework has high predictive performance for postoperative BMI and T2D remission up to 5 years after bariatric surgery. Dynamic incorporation of predicted weight trajectories enhances metabolic risk prediction and supports individualized counselling and postoperative management.

代谢减肥手术后体重指数和糖尿病预后预测模型的建立:回顾性队列研究。
背景:预测减肥手术后体重指数(BMI)轨迹和长期2型糖尿病(T2D)缓解仍然具有挑战性。现有模型通常仅依赖基线变量,而不能纳入术后动态变化。本研究旨在开发和验证一个多中心机器学习框架,该框架可以使用常规的术前数据和随时间变化的体重变化来预测个体化BMI轨迹和T2D缓解。方法:这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了11个欧洲中心(2012-2023)接受Roux-en-Y胃旁路或袖式胃切除术的成年患者。排除> 30%缺失数据的变量;剩余的缺失值迭代输入。采用两阶段方法:采用自回归设计预测术后3-60个月BMI的回归模型;以及使用基线特征和预测BMI轨迹预测T2D缓解的分类模型。内部绩效评估采用10倍交叉验证和留一诊所外交叉验证;外部验证使用来自瑞典Linköping的独立队列。结果:在最初确定的11457例患者中,9652例具有完整基线和随访信息的患者被用于分析。最佳BMI模型(HistGradientBoosting)在各诊所间的均方根误差(RMSE)为1.11 kg/m2(95%置信区间1.07 ~ 1.14),平均绝对误差(MAE)为0.62 kg/m2;外部检验显示RMSE为1.12 kg/m2(95%置信区间为1.11 ~ 1.12),MAE为0.63 kg/m2。T2D缓解分类器(XGBoost)的宏观F1得分为0.88(精度0.87,召回率0.88),外部F1得分为0.89。与仅基于基线的模型相比,纳入预测的BMI轨迹改善了歧视(c指数0.95对0.93)。结论:两阶段机器学习框架对减肥手术后长达5年的术后BMI和T2D缓解具有很高的预测性能。动态合并预测的体重轨迹可以增强代谢风险预测,并支持个性化咨询和术后管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书