Sustainability of biodegradable superabsorbent hydrogels in agriculture. A review

IF 8.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Portia Agyemang, Sujata Mandal, Sangchul Hwang
{"title":"Sustainability of biodegradable superabsorbent hydrogels in agriculture. A review","authors":"Portia Agyemang,&nbsp;Sujata Mandal,&nbsp;Sangchul Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s13593-026-01125-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biodegradable superabsorbent hydrogels have been proposed as soil conditioners to mitigate agricultural water stress, yet evidence on their agronomic relevance and environmental safety remains fragmented and contradictory. This review synthesizes current knowledge across five domains: material composition, swelling performance, biodegradation, field-scale application, and economic viability. A recurring performance–sustainability paradox is identified, whereby formulations that improve swelling stability and durability often compromise biodegradability, while environmentally benign designs show poor persistence and limited field efficacy. A critical analysis reveals a systematic overestimation of performance in laboratory studies relative to field conditions. Swelling capacities measured in distilled water are often 5–10 times higher than those realized in field soils, and biodegradation studies predominantly rely on indirect proxies rather than confirming complete mineralization, leaving ecological risks unresolved. Field application techniques, such as broadcasting, incorporation, and seed coating, provide localized benefits but lack scalability. Meanwhile, high production costs and incomplete life cycle assessments undermine claims of sustainability. Unlike earlier descriptive reviews, this study offers a critical integrative synthesis across technical, agronomic, ecological, and economic dimensions. Future progress depends on whole-system frameworks that incorporate standardized agro-climatic testing, isotopic tracing, and metagenomic monitoring of biodegradation, mechanized delivery technologies, and life cycle assessment. Such interdisciplinary validation is essential for harmonizing performance with sustainability and advancing BSAHs from experimental prototypes to credible tools for climate-resilient agriculture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-026-01125-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-026-01125-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodegradable superabsorbent hydrogels have been proposed as soil conditioners to mitigate agricultural water stress, yet evidence on their agronomic relevance and environmental safety remains fragmented and contradictory. This review synthesizes current knowledge across five domains: material composition, swelling performance, biodegradation, field-scale application, and economic viability. A recurring performance–sustainability paradox is identified, whereby formulations that improve swelling stability and durability often compromise biodegradability, while environmentally benign designs show poor persistence and limited field efficacy. A critical analysis reveals a systematic overestimation of performance in laboratory studies relative to field conditions. Swelling capacities measured in distilled water are often 5–10 times higher than those realized in field soils, and biodegradation studies predominantly rely on indirect proxies rather than confirming complete mineralization, leaving ecological risks unresolved. Field application techniques, such as broadcasting, incorporation, and seed coating, provide localized benefits but lack scalability. Meanwhile, high production costs and incomplete life cycle assessments undermine claims of sustainability. Unlike earlier descriptive reviews, this study offers a critical integrative synthesis across technical, agronomic, ecological, and economic dimensions. Future progress depends on whole-system frameworks that incorporate standardized agro-climatic testing, isotopic tracing, and metagenomic monitoring of biodegradation, mechanized delivery technologies, and life cycle assessment. Such interdisciplinary validation is essential for harmonizing performance with sustainability and advancing BSAHs from experimental prototypes to credible tools for climate-resilient agriculture.

Abstract Image

生物可降解高吸水性凝胶在农业中的可持续性。回顾
可生物降解的高吸水性水凝胶被认为是缓解农业用水压力的土壤调节剂,但关于其农艺相关性和环境安全性的证据仍然是碎片化和矛盾的。这篇综述综合了五个领域的最新知识:材料组成、膨胀性能、生物降解、现场规模应用和经济可行性。一个反复出现的性能可持续性悖论被发现,即提高膨胀稳定性和耐久性的配方往往会损害生物降解性,而环境友好的设计则表现出较差的持久性和有限的现场效果。一项批判性分析揭示了对实验室研究相对于现场条件的表现的系统性高估。在蒸馏水中测量到的溶胀能力通常比在田间土壤中测量到的溶胀能力高5-10倍,生物降解研究主要依赖于间接代理,而不是确认完全矿化,导致生态风险未得到解决。现场应用技术,如撒播、合并和种子包衣,提供了本地化的好处,但缺乏可扩展性。同时,高昂的生产成本和不完整的生命周期评估削弱了可持续性的主张。与早期的描述性综述不同,本研究在技术、农艺、生态和经济方面提供了关键的综合综合。未来的进展取决于包括标准化农业气候测试、同位素示踪、生物降解宏基因组监测、机械化输送技术和生命周期评估在内的全系统框架。这种跨学科验证对于协调绩效与可持续性以及将BSAHs从实验原型推进到气候适应型农业的可靠工具至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书