Smart Dosing, Better Outcomes: An Electronic Medical Record Intervention for Cancer Pain in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.8 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christopher J Coyne, Ryan Miller, Kelly Dong, Anthony S Tadros
{"title":"Smart Dosing, Better Outcomes: An Electronic Medical Record Intervention for Cancer Pain in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Christopher J Coyne, Ryan Miller, Kelly Dong, Anthony S Tadros","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that an electronic medical record (EMR)-based best practice advisory (BPA), offering individualized opioid dosing for cancer patients with high opioid tolerance, would improve pain control and reduce hospital admissions in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study from May 2020 to May 2024 across 2 academic EDs affiliated with a National Comprehensive Cancer Network cancer center. Adult patients with active cancer, a morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) ≥100, and an ED opioid order were eligible. The BPA calculated MEDD-based opioid dosing recommendations and provided safety measures. Patients were categorized as BPA+ (recommendation followed) or BPA- (recommendation ignored). The primary outcome was hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay and change in pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1193 patient encounters, 719 (60.3%) received BPA-directed therapy. BPA+ was associated with a lower odds ratio (OR) of admission compared to BPA- (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.80). The BPA was associated with decreased admission rates in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 4 (54% vs 80% admitted) and stage 4 cancer (57% vs 68% admitted). BPA+ was also associated with greater median pain improvement (-2 vs -1) and shorter ED stays (8.2 vs 8.9 hours). Among patients receiving multiple opioid doses, greater BPA adherence was associated with sustained pain reduction, while BPA nonadherence showed diminished response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An EMR-integrated BPA for opioid-tolerant cancer patients was associated with improved ED pain management and reduced admissions. These findings support broader use of EMR-based tools to promote guideline-concordant, personalized care for cancer-related pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"7 4","pages":"100449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13325251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We hypothesized that an electronic medical record (EMR)-based best practice advisory (BPA), offering individualized opioid dosing for cancer patients with high opioid tolerance, would improve pain control and reduce hospital admissions in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from May 2020 to May 2024 across 2 academic EDs affiliated with a National Comprehensive Cancer Network cancer center. Adult patients with active cancer, a morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) ≥100, and an ED opioid order were eligible. The BPA calculated MEDD-based opioid dosing recommendations and provided safety measures. Patients were categorized as BPA+ (recommendation followed) or BPA- (recommendation ignored). The primary outcome was hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included ED length of stay and change in pain scores.

Results: Among 1193 patient encounters, 719 (60.3%) received BPA-directed therapy. BPA+ was associated with a lower odds ratio (OR) of admission compared to BPA- (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.80). The BPA was associated with decreased admission rates in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 4 (54% vs 80% admitted) and stage 4 cancer (57% vs 68% admitted). BPA+ was also associated with greater median pain improvement (-2 vs -1) and shorter ED stays (8.2 vs 8.9 hours). Among patients receiving multiple opioid doses, greater BPA adherence was associated with sustained pain reduction, while BPA nonadherence showed diminished response.

Conclusion: An EMR-integrated BPA for opioid-tolerant cancer patients was associated with improved ED pain management and reduced admissions. These findings support broader use of EMR-based tools to promote guideline-concordant, personalized care for cancer-related pain.

智能剂量,更好的结果:电子医疗记录干预癌症疼痛在急诊科。
目的:我们假设基于电子病历(EMR)的最佳实践咨询(BPA),为阿片类药物耐受性高的癌症患者提供个体化阿片类药物剂量,将改善疼痛控制并减少急诊科(ED)的住院率。方法:我们于2020年5月至2024年5月在国家综合癌症网络癌症中心的2个学术ed中进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患有活动性癌症的成年患者,吗啡当量日剂量(MEDD)≥100,ED阿片类药物订单符合条件。BPA计算了基于medd的阿片类药物剂量建议,并提供了安全措施。患者被分为双酚a +(遵循建议)和双酚a -(忽略建议)。主要结局是住院。次要结果包括ED的住院时间和疼痛评分的变化。结果:1193例患者中,719例(60.3%)接受了双酚a定向治疗。与BPA-相比,BPA+与较低的入院优势比(OR)相关(OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.80)。BPA与东部肿瘤合作组表现状态为4(54%对80%入院)和4期癌症(57%对68%入院)患者入院率降低有关。BPA+还与更大的中位疼痛改善(-2 vs -1)和更短的ED停留时间(8.2 vs 8.9小时)相关。在接受多种阿片类药物剂量的患者中,更大的BPA依从性与持续的疼痛减轻有关,而BPA不依从性则表现出减少的反应。结论:emr整合BPA治疗阿片类药物耐受癌症患者与改善ED疼痛管理和减少入院率相关。这些发现支持更广泛地使用基于电子磁共振的工具,以促进对癌症相关疼痛的指导一致的个性化护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书