Muhammad Imran, Sameen Bin Naeem, Nahel Chaudhry, Saad Ehsan, Muhammad Awais Majeed
{"title":"Diagnostic Challenge of Gastric Glomangioma Mimicking Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report.","authors":"Muhammad Imran, Sameen Bin Naeem, Nahel Chaudhry, Saad Ehsan, Muhammad Awais Majeed","doi":"10.2478/jcas-2026-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastric glomus tumors (GGTs) are rare benign mesenchymal neoplasms of the stomach, often mistaken preoperatively for more common submucosal lesions such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Accurate diagnosis requires a combination of endoscopic ultrasonography, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>We report a 51-year-old female with a two-year history of epigastric burning, anorexia, and unexplained weight loss. Initial evaluation included EUS, which identified a 1.8 × 2.4 cm hypoechoic submucosal lesion arising from the muscularis propria at the gastric antrum. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated a 2 cm avidly enhancing antral lesion with persistent venous-phase enhancement; no evidence of lymphadenopathy or metastasis was noted. Subsequent EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) demonstrated an epithelioid neoplasm. Initial immunohistochemistry excluded GIST (CD117-, DOG1-), leiomyoma (desmin-), and schwannoma (S100-). Additional glomus tumor-specific markers were not performed at this stage due to limited biopsy material and a stepwise diagnostic approach. Given the peri-pancreatic location, diagnostic uncertainty, and lesion size exceeding 2 cm, the decision was made to proceed with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Final histopathology confirmed glomangioma, positive for SMA and vimentin; Ki-67 ~1%; 0 mitoses per 50 high-power fields (HPF); no atypia, necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, or clear margins. Postoperative surveillance CTs showed no recurrence; no adjuvant therapy was indicated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the clinical and radiologic overlap between GGT and other submucosal gastric lesions. Comprehensive immunohistochemistry and careful surgical planning are essential for accurate diagnosis and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","volume":"12 1","pages":"65-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13323606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jcas-2026-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Gastric glomus tumors (GGTs) are rare benign mesenchymal neoplasms of the stomach, often mistaken preoperatively for more common submucosal lesions such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Accurate diagnosis requires a combination of endoscopic ultrasonography, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry.
Case description: We report a 51-year-old female with a two-year history of epigastric burning, anorexia, and unexplained weight loss. Initial evaluation included EUS, which identified a 1.8 × 2.4 cm hypoechoic submucosal lesion arising from the muscularis propria at the gastric antrum. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated a 2 cm avidly enhancing antral lesion with persistent venous-phase enhancement; no evidence of lymphadenopathy or metastasis was noted. Subsequent EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) demonstrated an epithelioid neoplasm. Initial immunohistochemistry excluded GIST (CD117-, DOG1-), leiomyoma (desmin-), and schwannoma (S100-). Additional glomus tumor-specific markers were not performed at this stage due to limited biopsy material and a stepwise diagnostic approach. Given the peri-pancreatic location, diagnostic uncertainty, and lesion size exceeding 2 cm, the decision was made to proceed with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Final histopathology confirmed glomangioma, positive for SMA and vimentin; Ki-67 ~1%; 0 mitoses per 50 high-power fields (HPF); no atypia, necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, or clear margins. Postoperative surveillance CTs showed no recurrence; no adjuvant therapy was indicated.
Conclusion: This case highlights the clinical and radiologic overlap between GGT and other submucosal gastric lesions. Comprehensive immunohistochemistry and careful surgical planning are essential for accurate diagnosis and management.