Mariana Córdoba, Florencia Labombarda, John Dupré, Ana Belén Martínez, Dana María Negretti-Borga
{"title":"The gendered \"stathetic\" body: a scientifically informed philosophical approach to corporality.","authors":"Mariana Córdoba, Florencia Labombarda, John Dupré, Ana Belén Martínez, Dana María Negretti-Borga","doi":"10.1007/s40656-026-00743-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bodies are often treated as entities expected to conform to stable, idealized forms, such as binary sex, health, youth, beauty, slimness. Bodies must tend to present static and aesthetic traits. Yet this apparent stability conceals a deeper tension: bodies are continuously shaped, constrained, and reconfigured by biological processes, social norms, and technological interventions. In this paper, we develop a scientifically informed philosophical account of corporality that challenges static conceptions of the body. Drawing on a process ontology of organisms and the biological concept of autopoiesis, we argue that bodies are constantly produced, and that this production crucially includes technology. On this basis, we introduce the notion of the gendered stathetic body (\"stathetic\" from static and aesthetic), to describe how bodies are persistently forced to stabilize within a multidimensional \"cage\" of idealized traits. Through the analysis of contemporary medical and aesthetic interventions, we show that the pursuit of fixed, desirable characteristics operates as a form of mystification and constitutes a subtle yet pervasive violence against bodies. At the same time, we argue that corporality is never fully determined: it unfolds within a political field of tension, where the same technologies that enforce stabilization may also enable new forms of transformation and emancipation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-026-00743-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bodies are often treated as entities expected to conform to stable, idealized forms, such as binary sex, health, youth, beauty, slimness. Bodies must tend to present static and aesthetic traits. Yet this apparent stability conceals a deeper tension: bodies are continuously shaped, constrained, and reconfigured by biological processes, social norms, and technological interventions. In this paper, we develop a scientifically informed philosophical account of corporality that challenges static conceptions of the body. Drawing on a process ontology of organisms and the biological concept of autopoiesis, we argue that bodies are constantly produced, and that this production crucially includes technology. On this basis, we introduce the notion of the gendered stathetic body ("stathetic" from static and aesthetic), to describe how bodies are persistently forced to stabilize within a multidimensional "cage" of idealized traits. Through the analysis of contemporary medical and aesthetic interventions, we show that the pursuit of fixed, desirable characteristics operates as a form of mystification and constitutes a subtle yet pervasive violence against bodies. At the same time, we argue that corporality is never fully determined: it unfolds within a political field of tension, where the same technologies that enforce stabilization may also enable new forms of transformation and emancipation.
期刊介绍:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).