The gendered "stathetic" body: a scientifically informed philosophical approach to corporality.

IF 1 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Mariana Córdoba, Florencia Labombarda, John Dupré, Ana Belén Martínez, Dana María Negretti-Borga
{"title":"The gendered \"stathetic\" body: a scientifically informed philosophical approach to corporality.","authors":"Mariana Córdoba, Florencia Labombarda, John Dupré, Ana Belén Martínez, Dana María Negretti-Borga","doi":"10.1007/s40656-026-00743-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bodies are often treated as entities expected to conform to stable, idealized forms, such as binary sex, health, youth, beauty, slimness. Bodies must tend to present static and aesthetic traits. Yet this apparent stability conceals a deeper tension: bodies are continuously shaped, constrained, and reconfigured by biological processes, social norms, and technological interventions. In this paper, we develop a scientifically informed philosophical account of corporality that challenges static conceptions of the body. Drawing on a process ontology of organisms and the biological concept of autopoiesis, we argue that bodies are constantly produced, and that this production crucially includes technology. On this basis, we introduce the notion of the gendered stathetic body (\"stathetic\" from static and aesthetic), to describe how bodies are persistently forced to stabilize within a multidimensional \"cage\" of idealized traits. Through the analysis of contemporary medical and aesthetic interventions, we show that the pursuit of fixed, desirable characteristics operates as a form of mystification and constitutes a subtle yet pervasive violence against bodies. At the same time, we argue that corporality is never fully determined: it unfolds within a political field of tension, where the same technologies that enforce stabilization may also enable new forms of transformation and emancipation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-026-00743-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bodies are often treated as entities expected to conform to stable, idealized forms, such as binary sex, health, youth, beauty, slimness. Bodies must tend to present static and aesthetic traits. Yet this apparent stability conceals a deeper tension: bodies are continuously shaped, constrained, and reconfigured by biological processes, social norms, and technological interventions. In this paper, we develop a scientifically informed philosophical account of corporality that challenges static conceptions of the body. Drawing on a process ontology of organisms and the biological concept of autopoiesis, we argue that bodies are constantly produced, and that this production crucially includes technology. On this basis, we introduce the notion of the gendered stathetic body ("stathetic" from static and aesthetic), to describe how bodies are persistently forced to stabilize within a multidimensional "cage" of idealized traits. Through the analysis of contemporary medical and aesthetic interventions, we show that the pursuit of fixed, desirable characteristics operates as a form of mystification and constitutes a subtle yet pervasive violence against bodies. At the same time, we argue that corporality is never fully determined: it unfolds within a political field of tension, where the same technologies that enforce stabilization may also enable new forms of transformation and emancipation.

性别化的“审美”身体:一种科学的哲学方法。
身体通常被视为符合稳定、理想化形式的实体,如二元性别、健康、年轻、美丽、苗条。身体必须倾向于呈现静态和美学特征。然而,这种表面上的稳定隐藏着更深层次的紧张:身体不断地被生物过程、社会规范和技术干预所塑造、约束和重新配置。在本文中,我们发展了一个科学告知的肉体的哲学帐户,挑战静态概念的身体。根据生物体的过程本体论和自创生的生物学概念,我们认为身体是不断生产的,而且这种生产至关重要地包括技术。在此基础上,我们引入了性别静态身体的概念(“静态”来自静态和美学),以描述身体如何持续地被迫稳定在理想化特征的多维“笼子”中。通过对当代医学和美学干预的分析,我们表明,对固定的、理想的特征的追求是一种神秘化的形式,构成了对身体的微妙而普遍的暴力。与此同时,我们认为,肉体性从来没有完全确定:它在紧张的政治领域中展开,在那里,强制稳定的相同技术也可能使新形式的转型和解放成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书