Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Family Medicine Educators.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alisa P Young, Rosa Reyes, Chidera Mgbudem, Dongru Chen, Ananda Sen, Diane M Harper
{"title":"Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Family Medicine Educators.","authors":"Alisa P Young, Rosa Reyes, Chidera Mgbudem, Dongru Chen, Ananda Sen, Diane M Harper","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2025.250328R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Half of the women who develop cervical cancer in the US have never had a cervical cancer screen. Self-sampling is an equivalent technique to the invasive speculum exam. We aim to evaluate the current knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward self-sampled primary HPV testing in family medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The annual cross-sectional survey of the Council of Academic Family Medicine's general membership included knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening using self-sampling. The knowledge questions were based on current guidelines, as defined by the 2024 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 1. The attitude and belief questions were based on the Question-Behavior Theory 2. All surveys were emailed to the membership with up to five weekly reminders to complete.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had a 62% survey response rate with 744 respondents. Regardless of demographic descriptors, all respondents significantly changed their intended behavior regarding offering self-sampling for cervical cancer screening (p < 0.001). Of those with a baseline attitude of not offering self-sampling, 88% changed their response to offer self-sampling at the end of the survey. Baseline knowledge of the advantages of primary HPV screening was lowest among underrepresented minority Hispanic respondents (52% correct, compared to 80% among Whites, p < 0.001). Women respondents were 2.96 times more likely to intend to offer self-sampling for cervical cancer screening than men (OR 2.96 (95% CI: 1.18, 7.44, p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the Question-Behavior Theory, over 90% of family medicine educators intend to offer women self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2025.250328R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Half of the women who develop cervical cancer in the US have never had a cervical cancer screen. Self-sampling is an equivalent technique to the invasive speculum exam. We aim to evaluate the current knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward self-sampled primary HPV testing in family medicine.

Methods: The annual cross-sectional survey of the Council of Academic Family Medicine's general membership included knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening using self-sampling. The knowledge questions were based on current guidelines, as defined by the 2024 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 1. The attitude and belief questions were based on the Question-Behavior Theory 2. All surveys were emailed to the membership with up to five weekly reminders to complete.

Results: We had a 62% survey response rate with 744 respondents. Regardless of demographic descriptors, all respondents significantly changed their intended behavior regarding offering self-sampling for cervical cancer screening (p < 0.001). Of those with a baseline attitude of not offering self-sampling, 88% changed their response to offer self-sampling at the end of the survey. Baseline knowledge of the advantages of primary HPV screening was lowest among underrepresented minority Hispanic respondents (52% correct, compared to 80% among Whites, p < 0.001). Women respondents were 2.96 times more likely to intend to offer self-sampling for cervical cancer screening than men (OR 2.96 (95% CI: 1.18, 7.44, p<0.05).

Conclusions: Based on the Question-Behavior Theory, over 90% of family medicine educators intend to offer women self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.

家庭医学教育工作者宫颈癌筛查的原发性HPV检测。
背景:在美国,一半患宫颈癌的妇女从未接受过宫颈癌筛查。自取样是一种与侵入性镜检查相当的技术。我们的目的是评估目前的知识,态度和行为对自我抽样原发性HPV检测在家庭医学。方法:对学术家庭医学委员会的一般成员进行年度横断面调查,包括使用自抽样进行原发性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)筛查的知识、态度和信念。知识问题基于2024年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)定义的现行指南1。态度和信念问题基于问题-行为理论2。所有的调查都通过电子邮件发送给会员,每周提醒他们完成五次。结果:744人的调查回复率为62%。无论人口统计学描述符如何,所有受访者都显著改变了他们为宫颈癌筛查提供自我抽样的预期行为(p < 0.001)。在那些不提供自我抽样的基本态度中,88%的人在调查结束时改变了他们的回答,提供了自我抽样。在未被充分代表的西班牙裔少数民族受访者中,对初次HPV筛查优势的基线知识最低(52%正确,而白人为80%,p < 0.001)。女性受访者希望在宫颈癌筛查中提供自我抽样的可能性是男性的2.96倍(OR: 2.96) (95% CI: 1.18, 7.44)。结论:基于问题-行为理论,超过90%的家庭医学教育者希望在宫颈癌筛查中提供女性自我抽样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书