An Analysis of Common Questions and Concerns of Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kevin Lal, Clara Schneider, Anna M Espinoza, Z Noah Hendrix, Richard A Young, Annesha White, Cindy M Lopez, Yan Xiao, Kimberly G Fulda
{"title":"An Analysis of Common Questions and Concerns of Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions.","authors":"Kevin Lal, Clara Schneider, Anna M Espinoza, Z Noah Hendrix, Richard A Young, Annesha White, Cindy M Lopez, Yan Xiao, Kimberly G Fulda","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2025.250240R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Studies have shown that facilitating patient dialogue through a structured question prompt list (QPL) during patient encounters results in greater patient engagement, improved communication and increased patient understanding. Topics most interesting to patients are unclear, thus limiting how to optimally design and use QPLs. This study identified topics most interesting to patients to discuss with their clinicians in primary care office visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected responses to a 20-item visit guide including questions to ask, concerns to tell, and positive behaviors to report. We focused on the ask and tell sections which involved general questions and concerns patients could choose from. Participants were 50 years or older and taking 5 or more medications at family medicine clinics from a public safety net hospital system (240) and an urban private practice (211).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 451 visit guides collected, the selected top topics involved: 1) Diet (20.4%), 2) Taking fewer medications (15.3%), and 3) Understanding their condition (14.6%). The most common medication concerns included: 1) stopping or skipping medications due to cost, side effects, or other reasons (11.1%), 2) medications from multiple doctors (8%), and 3) specific concerns about medications (5.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients reported interest in discussing questions and concerns related to diet, reducing medications, and self-care knowledge on their conditions. The questions and concerns identified in this study provide insight into the communication priorities of older adults managing multiple medications. These findings can further inform the future development of QPLs and therefore potentially reap the benefits of improved clinician-patient communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2025.250240R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Studies have shown that facilitating patient dialogue through a structured question prompt list (QPL) during patient encounters results in greater patient engagement, improved communication and increased patient understanding. Topics most interesting to patients are unclear, thus limiting how to optimally design and use QPLs. This study identified topics most interesting to patients to discuss with their clinicians in primary care office visits.

Methods: We collected responses to a 20-item visit guide including questions to ask, concerns to tell, and positive behaviors to report. We focused on the ask and tell sections which involved general questions and concerns patients could choose from. Participants were 50 years or older and taking 5 or more medications at family medicine clinics from a public safety net hospital system (240) and an urban private practice (211).

Results: Of 451 visit guides collected, the selected top topics involved: 1) Diet (20.4%), 2) Taking fewer medications (15.3%), and 3) Understanding their condition (14.6%). The most common medication concerns included: 1) stopping or skipping medications due to cost, side effects, or other reasons (11.1%), 2) medications from multiple doctors (8%), and 3) specific concerns about medications (5.7%).

Conclusions: Patients reported interest in discussing questions and concerns related to diet, reducing medications, and self-care knowledge on their conditions. The questions and concerns identified in this study provide insight into the communication priorities of older adults managing multiple medications. These findings can further inform the future development of QPLs and therefore potentially reap the benefits of improved clinician-patient communication.

老年人多重慢性疾病的常见问题与关注分析
目的:研究表明,通过结构化的问题提示列表(QPL)在患者遇到时促进患者对话,可以提高患者参与度,改善沟通并增加患者理解。患者最感兴趣的主题尚不清楚,因此限制了如何优化设计和使用QPLs。本研究确定了患者在初级保健办公室访问时与临床医生讨论的最感兴趣的话题。方法:我们收集了20项访问指南的反馈,包括要问的问题、要告诉的担忧和要报告的积极行为。我们把重点放在提问和回答部分,其中包括病人可以选择的一般性问题和顾虑。参与者年龄≥50岁,在公共安全网医院系统(240人)和城市私人诊所(211人)的家庭医学诊所服用5种或5种以上药物。结果:在收集到的451名导游中,选择的热门话题包括:1)饮食(20.4%)、2)少服药(15.3%)和3)了解自己的状况(14.6%)。最常见的用药问题包括:1)因费用、副作用或其他原因停药或不服药(11.1%),2)多名医生服药(8%),以及3)对药物的特殊担忧(5.7%)。结论:患者报告有兴趣讨论与饮食,减少药物和自我保健知识有关的问题和问题。本研究中确定的问题和关注点为老年人管理多种药物的沟通优先事项提供了见解。这些发现可以进一步为QPLs的未来发展提供信息,因此有可能从改善医患沟通中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书