Post-traumatic anterior glenohumeral microinstability in nonathletic patients satisfactory short-term outcomes of a case-control study of concurrent intra-articular soft arthroscopic Latarjet technique and suture-anchor capsular plication
{"title":"Post-traumatic anterior glenohumeral microinstability in nonathletic patients satisfactory short-term outcomes of a case-control study of concurrent intra-articular soft arthroscopic Latarjet technique and suture-anchor capsular plication","authors":"Amr Abdel-Mordy Kandeel MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2026.101167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Objectives</h3><div>Arthroscopic management of post-traumatic anterior glenohumeral micro-instability, in the non-athletes, has not yet been thoroughly investigated. The current study compared the outcomes of antero-inferior capsulo-labral repair for the management of anterior glenohumeral microinstability (following a single-event trauma in the nonathletes) versus those of Bankart repair for the management of recurrent anterior gleno-humeral dislocation/macro-instability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Conducted between March 2018 and February 2024, this case–control study included 62 patients allocated according to the managed pathology into 2 groups. Group A included 21 nonathletes with anterior glenohumeral microinstability (following single-event trauma) managed with suture-anchor antero-inferior capsulo-labral repair coupled with the intra-articular soft arthroscopic Latarjet technique (in-SALT), including soft-tissue biceps tenodesis to the upper subscapularis. Whereas group B, on the other hand, included 41 nonathletes with recurrent anterior glenohumeral dislocation/macroinstability (i.e. type-V superior labrum anterior to posterior [SLAP] lesion) managed with suture-anchor Bankart repair coupled with in-SALT. Outcome measurements included the 2-year postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score; range of forward flexion (FF) and external rotation (ER) at 90°-abduction; and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Rowe scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no intergroup statistically significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. The mean age of the patients was 26.8 ± 7.0 in group A and 26.6 ± 6.8 in group B. Other than 1 female patient in each group, all included patients were male. Except for range of motion in group A, patients in both groups had significant postoperative improvement in all outcome measurements (P < 0.05 for all). Both groups showed comparable postoperative outcomes in terms of the VAS score (1.0 ± 0.8 vs 1.1 ± 0.9; <em>P</em> = 0.607), FF (173.8° ± 7.4° vs 172.2° ± 5.2°; <em>P</em> = 0.324), ER at 90°-abduction (83.3° ± 7.3° vs 80.7° ± 6.1°; <em>P</em> = 0.142), ASES score (91.5 ± 4.4 vs 92.1 ± 3.0; <em>P</em> = 0.582); Rowe score (89.8 ± 4.0 vs 88.2 ± 5.8; <em>P</em> = 0.264), and instability persistence/recurrence (4.8% vs 2.4%; <em>P</em> = 0.624), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anterior glenohumeral micro-instability following a single-event trauma in nonathletes could be successfully managed (in a way similar to that of type-V SLAP lesion of the recurrent anterior glenohumeral dislocation/macroinstability) via in-SALT-augmented suture-anchor antero-inferior capsulo-labral repair with comparable outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>The study was approved by the Institutional Committee of Scientific Research and Ethics (IRB: 2/2023 ORTH 30-3).</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775426001033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction/Objectives
Arthroscopic management of post-traumatic anterior glenohumeral micro-instability, in the non-athletes, has not yet been thoroughly investigated. The current study compared the outcomes of antero-inferior capsulo-labral repair for the management of anterior glenohumeral microinstability (following a single-event trauma in the nonathletes) versus those of Bankart repair for the management of recurrent anterior gleno-humeral dislocation/macro-instability.
Methods
Conducted between March 2018 and February 2024, this case–control study included 62 patients allocated according to the managed pathology into 2 groups. Group A included 21 nonathletes with anterior glenohumeral microinstability (following single-event trauma) managed with suture-anchor antero-inferior capsulo-labral repair coupled with the intra-articular soft arthroscopic Latarjet technique (in-SALT), including soft-tissue biceps tenodesis to the upper subscapularis. Whereas group B, on the other hand, included 41 nonathletes with recurrent anterior glenohumeral dislocation/macroinstability (i.e. type-V superior labrum anterior to posterior [SLAP] lesion) managed with suture-anchor Bankart repair coupled with in-SALT. Outcome measurements included the 2-year postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score; range of forward flexion (FF) and external rotation (ER) at 90°-abduction; and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Rowe scores.
Results
There were no intergroup statistically significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. The mean age of the patients was 26.8 ± 7.0 in group A and 26.6 ± 6.8 in group B. Other than 1 female patient in each group, all included patients were male. Except for range of motion in group A, patients in both groups had significant postoperative improvement in all outcome measurements (P < 0.05 for all). Both groups showed comparable postoperative outcomes in terms of the VAS score (1.0 ± 0.8 vs 1.1 ± 0.9; P = 0.607), FF (173.8° ± 7.4° vs 172.2° ± 5.2°; P = 0.324), ER at 90°-abduction (83.3° ± 7.3° vs 80.7° ± 6.1°; P = 0.142), ASES score (91.5 ± 4.4 vs 92.1 ± 3.0; P = 0.582); Rowe score (89.8 ± 4.0 vs 88.2 ± 5.8; P = 0.264), and instability persistence/recurrence (4.8% vs 2.4%; P = 0.624), respectively.
Conclusion
Anterior glenohumeral micro-instability following a single-event trauma in nonathletes could be successfully managed (in a way similar to that of type-V SLAP lesion of the recurrent anterior glenohumeral dislocation/macroinstability) via in-SALT-augmented suture-anchor antero-inferior capsulo-labral repair with comparable outcomes.
Trial Registration
The study was approved by the Institutional Committee of Scientific Research and Ethics (IRB: 2/2023 ORTH 30-3).
介绍/目的:关节镜下治疗创伤后肱骨前关节微不稳定,在非运动员中,尚未被彻底研究。目前的研究比较了前下囊唇修复术治疗肱骨前关节微不稳定(非运动员单一事件创伤后)与Bankart修复术治疗复发性肱骨前关节脱位/宏观不稳定的结果。方法:本病例对照研究于2018年3月至2024年2月进行,62例患者根据病理管理分为两组。(A)组包括21名患有肱骨前关节微不稳定(单事件创伤后)的非运动员,采用缝合锚定前-下关节囊-唇瓣修复联合关节内软关节镜Latarjet技术(in-SALT),包括肩胛下肌软组织二头肌肌腱固定术。而B组包括41例复发性肱骨前脱位/宏观不稳定(即v型上唇前后[SLAP]病变)的非运动员,采用缝合锚定Bankart修复联合in-SALT治疗。结果测量包括术后2年视觉模拟评分(VAS);90°外展时的前屈(FF)和外旋(ER)范围;美国肩关节外科医生(ASES)和Rowe评分。结果:两组患者基线特征无统计学差异。A组患者平均年龄为(26.8±7.0)岁;(B)组(26.6±6.8)。各组除1例女性患者外,其余均为男性患者。除A组的活动范围外,两组患者术后所有结局指标均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。两组在VAS评分(1.0±0.8 vs 1.1±0.9,P = 0.607)、FF(173.80±7.4 vs 172.20±5.2,P = 0.324)、90°外展ER(83.3±7.30 vs 80.7±6.10,P = 0.142)、as评分(91.5±4.4 vs 92.1±3.0,P = 0.582)、ase评分(91.5±4.4 vs 92.1±3.0,P = 0.582)、ase评分(91.5±4.4 vs 92.1±3.0,P = 0.582)、ase评分(83.3±7.30 vs 80.7±5.20,P = 0.324)、ase评分(91.5±4.4 vs 92.1±3.0,P = 0.582)。Rowe评分(89.8±4.0比88.2±5.8,P = 0.264)和不稳定持续/复发(4.8%比2.4%,P = 0.624)。结论:非运动员单一事件创伤后肱骨前关节微不稳定可以通过盐增强缝合锚定前下唇囊修复成功治疗(类似于复发性肱骨前关节脱位/宏观不稳定的v型SLAP病变),结果相似。试验注册:该研究已获得科学研究与伦理制度委员会(IRB: 2/2023 north 30-3)的批准。证据水平:III。