Consideration of the use of nalbuphine in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-associated cough: to cough or not to cough so much?

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sheila A Doggrell
{"title":"Consideration of the use of nalbuphine in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-associated cough: to cough or not to cough so much?","authors":"Sheila A Doggrell","doi":"10.1080/13543784.2026.2698522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cough is very common in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and reduces quality of life. A low dose of the opioid µ-receptor agonist morphine reduced cough in subjects with IPF in a phase 2 clinical trial. However, the use of morphine for cough may be limited by adverse events (e.g. constipation) and its addiction potential. As a µ-receptor antagonist/partial agonist and κ-receptor agonist, nalbuphine may have less adverse events and be more effective against cough than morphine. In a phase 2b study (CORAL), after 6 weeks, nalbuphine 54 and 108 mg twice daily orally reduced the frequency of cough (by up to 60%), the severity of cough and improved the quality of life in subjects with IPF. Notably, the cough rate remained relatively high with nalbuphine and adverse events were common. Future studies should be directed at doses of nalbuphine or morphine that could possibly cause a greater or similar reduction in cough with a lesser incidence of adverse events. Although, the opioid agonists tested so far are not ideal treatments for cough in IPF, they are probably the best agents available to date. Nevertheless, the search for other agents with improved profiles between benefit and adverse events should continue.</p>","PeriodicalId":12313,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","volume":" ","pages":"499-502"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2026.2698522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cough is very common in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and reduces quality of life. A low dose of the opioid µ-receptor agonist morphine reduced cough in subjects with IPF in a phase 2 clinical trial. However, the use of morphine for cough may be limited by adverse events (e.g. constipation) and its addiction potential. As a µ-receptor antagonist/partial agonist and κ-receptor agonist, nalbuphine may have less adverse events and be more effective against cough than morphine. In a phase 2b study (CORAL), after 6 weeks, nalbuphine 54 and 108 mg twice daily orally reduced the frequency of cough (by up to 60%), the severity of cough and improved the quality of life in subjects with IPF. Notably, the cough rate remained relatively high with nalbuphine and adverse events were common. Future studies should be directed at doses of nalbuphine or morphine that could possibly cause a greater or similar reduction in cough with a lesser incidence of adverse events. Although, the opioid agonists tested so far are not ideal treatments for cough in IPF, they are probably the best agents available to date. Nevertheless, the search for other agents with improved profiles between benefit and adverse events should continue.

考虑使用纳布啡治疗特发性肺纤维化相关性咳嗽:咳还是不咳那么多?
咳嗽在特发性肺纤维化(IPF)中非常常见,并降低生活质量。在一项2期临床试验中,低剂量的阿片微受体激动剂吗啡可以减少IPF患者的咳嗽。然而,使用吗啡治疗咳嗽可能受到不良事件(如便秘)及其成瘾性的限制。作为微受体拮抗剂/部分激动剂和κ受体激动剂,纳布啡可能比吗啡有更少的不良事件和更有效的咳嗽。在一项2b期研究(CORAL)中,6周后,纳布啡54和108 mg每日2次口服降低了IPF患者的咳嗽频率(高达60%)、咳嗽严重程度并改善了生活质量。值得注意的是,服用纳布啡后咳嗽率仍然相对较高,不良事件也很常见。未来的研究应该针对纳布啡或吗啡的剂量,这些剂量可能会导致更大或类似的咳嗽减少,而不良事件的发生率较低。虽然目前测试的阿片类激动剂不是治疗IPF咳嗽的理想药物,但它们可能是迄今为止最好的药物。尽管如此,寻找其他在获益和不良事件之间有改善的药物应该继续下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (ISSN 1354-3784 [print], 1744-7658 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on drugs in preclinical and early stage clinical development, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering preclinical through to Phase II data on drugs or drug classes for specific indications, and their potential impact on future treatment strategies Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical and pharmacological data on a particular drug Original Research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on agents that are in Phase I and II clinical trials The audience consists of scientists, managers and decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry, and others closely involved in R&D.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书