Detection of cancer recurrence from Thai-English electronic medical records using sentence embeddings.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ekapob Sangariyavanich, Wanchana Ponthongmak, Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt, Nat Tangchitnob, Gareth J McKay, Ammarin Thakkinstian
{"title":"Detection of cancer recurrence from Thai-English electronic medical records using sentence embeddings.","authors":"Ekapob Sangariyavanich, Wanchana Ponthongmak, Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt, Nat Tangchitnob, Gareth J McKay, Ammarin Thakkinstian","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study developed and validated monolingual and bilingual sentence-bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (SBERT) models for detecting cancer recurrence within Thai-English electronic medical records (EMRs) from Thai cancer hospitals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multicentre dataset of 32 436 documents from 1250 patients was used for model development. External validation involved an independent dataset of 9244 documents from 384 patients across two Thai cancer hospitals. Performance was benchmarked against a fine-tuned PubMedBERT (MetBERT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The development dataset included breast (43.9%), colorectal (12.1%), cervical (28.0%) and head and neck (16.0%) cancers. MetBERT achieved the highest area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) for locoregional versus no recurrence (11.1%) and locoregional versus distant recurrence (91.7%), while monolingual-SBERT excelled at distant versus no recurrence (32.0%). External validation demonstrated MetBERT superiority for locoregional versus no recurrence (9.30%-21.50%). For distant versus no recurrence, bilingual-SBERT performed best with AUPRC 17.55%-24.39%. While MetBERT led in distinguishing locoregional versus distant recurrence (88.30%-94.70%), bilingual-SBERT demonstrated robust external validation performance (AUPRC 85.25%-91.80%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low AUPRC values (9%-32%) reflect the extreme class imbalance in real-world data (~1% recurrence prevalence). Despite this, fine-tuned MetBERT achieved highest performance, while bilingual-SBERT demonstrated superior robustness during external validation. This validates sentence embedding models for handling mixed Thai-English medical records in multilingual clinical environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sentence embedding frameworks provide a practical, generalisable solution for detecting cancer recurrence within multilingual EMRs. Despite text-length constraints, these models are suitable for clinical integration as a screening tool for cancer registry workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13330879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study developed and validated monolingual and bilingual sentence-bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (SBERT) models for detecting cancer recurrence within Thai-English electronic medical records (EMRs) from Thai cancer hospitals.

Method: A multicentre dataset of 32 436 documents from 1250 patients was used for model development. External validation involved an independent dataset of 9244 documents from 384 patients across two Thai cancer hospitals. Performance was benchmarked against a fine-tuned PubMedBERT (MetBERT).

Results: The development dataset included breast (43.9%), colorectal (12.1%), cervical (28.0%) and head and neck (16.0%) cancers. MetBERT achieved the highest area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) for locoregional versus no recurrence (11.1%) and locoregional versus distant recurrence (91.7%), while monolingual-SBERT excelled at distant versus no recurrence (32.0%). External validation demonstrated MetBERT superiority for locoregional versus no recurrence (9.30%-21.50%). For distant versus no recurrence, bilingual-SBERT performed best with AUPRC 17.55%-24.39%. While MetBERT led in distinguishing locoregional versus distant recurrence (88.30%-94.70%), bilingual-SBERT demonstrated robust external validation performance (AUPRC 85.25%-91.80%).

Discussion: Low AUPRC values (9%-32%) reflect the extreme class imbalance in real-world data (~1% recurrence prevalence). Despite this, fine-tuned MetBERT achieved highest performance, while bilingual-SBERT demonstrated superior robustness during external validation. This validates sentence embedding models for handling mixed Thai-English medical records in multilingual clinical environments.

Conclusion: Sentence embedding frameworks provide a practical, generalisable solution for detecting cancer recurrence within multilingual EMRs. Despite text-length constraints, these models are suitable for clinical integration as a screening tool for cancer registry workflows.

基于句子嵌入的泰英电子病历癌症复发检测。
目的:本研究开发并验证了来自变压器(SBERT)模型的单语和双语句子双向编码器表示,用于检测泰国癌症医院的泰英电子病历(emr)中的癌症复发。方法:使用来自1250例患者的32 436份多中心数据集进行模型开发。外部验证涉及来自泰国两家癌症医院384名患者的9244份文件的独立数据集。性能是根据经过微调的PubMedBERT (MetBERT)进行基准测试的。结果:发展数据集包括乳腺癌(43.9%)、结直肠癌(12.1%)、宫颈癌(28.0%)和头颈癌(16.0%)。MetBERT在局部区域与无复发(11.1%)、局部区域与远端复发(91.7%)的准确率召回曲线(AUPRC)下面积最高,而单语- sbert在远端与无复发(32.0%)的准确率召回曲线下面积最高。外部验证表明MetBERT在局部和无复发方面的优势(9.30%-21.50%)。对于远处复发和无复发,双语sbert与AUPRC的疗效最好,分别为17.55%-24.39%。MetBERT在区分局部复发和远处复发方面领先(88.30%-94.70%),双语- sbert在外部验证方面表现强劲(AUPRC为85.25%-91.80%)。讨论:较低的AUPRC值(9%-32%)反映了现实数据中极端的类别不平衡(~1%的复发率)。尽管如此,微调MetBERT取得了最高的性能,而双语- sbert在外部验证中表现出优越的鲁棒性。这验证了在多语言临床环境中处理泰英混合医疗记录的句子嵌入模型。结论:句子嵌入框架为检测多语言电子病历中的癌症复发提供了一种实用、通用的解决方案。尽管文本长度的限制,这些模型适合临床整合作为癌症登记工作流程的筛选工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书