Enhancing anastomosis safety with intraoperative perfusion assessment: a visual grading system for tailoring resection and ostomy formation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery.

IF 2.2 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-26 DOI:10.3393/ac.2025.01081.0154
Soo Young Oh, Seok-Byung Lim, Eu-Tteum Choi, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Chang Sik Yu
{"title":"Enhancing anastomosis safety with intraoperative perfusion assessment: a visual grading system for tailoring resection and ostomy formation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery.","authors":"Soo Young Oh, Seok-Byung Lim, Eu-Tteum Choi, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Chang Sik Yu","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.01081.0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anastomotic leakage remains challenging in left-sided colorectal surgery. We previously proposed a 5-grade visual grading system based on marginal vessel bleeding, indicating that good (grades A/B) to moderate (grade C) perfusion generally ensures safe anastomosis. However, borderline perfusion (grade C) carried additional risk, particularly among older patients or those with comorbidities. We refined this system to determine whether selective resection of grade C bowel could improve perfusion and guide ostomy diversion decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients with left-sided colorectal cancer underwent curative-intent surgery. Intraoperatively, both marginal vessel and mucosal bleeding were assessed. Initial perfusion grade-guided decision-making: grades A/B proceeded to anastomosis, whereas for grade C, additional resection was performed to upgrade perfusion. Ostomy diversion was performed for persistent grade C or prophylactically in high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 80 patients, 67 (83.8%) had grades A/B and 13 (16.3%) were initial grade C. Additional resection (mean, 4.5 cm) upgraded perfusion to final grade B in 9 patients (69.2%), enabling primary anastomosis. Overall, 12 patients (15.0%) received ostomy: 4 for persistent grade C and 8 for high-risk indications despite adequate final perfusion. All 76 patients with final grade A/B achieved 0% anastomotic leakage and ischemic colitis. Grade C patients had longer operative times (108.8 minutes vs. 86.6 minutes, P=0.003) with additional procedures. Patients requiring diversion were older with more comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By actively applying the intraoperative visual grading system to upgrade borderline perfusion, we achieved low postoperative complication rates. This approach provides a simple and practical strategy to support intraoperative clinical judgment and optimize anastomotic safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"42 3","pages":"303-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13327898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.01081.0154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Anastomotic leakage remains challenging in left-sided colorectal surgery. We previously proposed a 5-grade visual grading system based on marginal vessel bleeding, indicating that good (grades A/B) to moderate (grade C) perfusion generally ensures safe anastomosis. However, borderline perfusion (grade C) carried additional risk, particularly among older patients or those with comorbidities. We refined this system to determine whether selective resection of grade C bowel could improve perfusion and guide ostomy diversion decisions.

Methods: Eighty patients with left-sided colorectal cancer underwent curative-intent surgery. Intraoperatively, both marginal vessel and mucosal bleeding were assessed. Initial perfusion grade-guided decision-making: grades A/B proceeded to anastomosis, whereas for grade C, additional resection was performed to upgrade perfusion. Ostomy diversion was performed for persistent grade C or prophylactically in high-risk patients.

Results: Among 80 patients, 67 (83.8%) had grades A/B and 13 (16.3%) were initial grade C. Additional resection (mean, 4.5 cm) upgraded perfusion to final grade B in 9 patients (69.2%), enabling primary anastomosis. Overall, 12 patients (15.0%) received ostomy: 4 for persistent grade C and 8 for high-risk indications despite adequate final perfusion. All 76 patients with final grade A/B achieved 0% anastomotic leakage and ischemic colitis. Grade C patients had longer operative times (108.8 minutes vs. 86.6 minutes, P=0.003) with additional procedures. Patients requiring diversion were older with more comorbidities.

Conclusion: By actively applying the intraoperative visual grading system to upgrade borderline perfusion, we achieved low postoperative complication rates. This approach provides a simple and practical strategy to support intraoperative clinical judgment and optimize anastomotic safety.

术中灌注评估提高吻合安全性:乙状结肠直肠癌手术中剪裁切除和造口形成的视觉分级系统。
目的:吻合口瘘是左侧结直肠手术的难点。我们之前提出了一个基于边缘血管出血的5级视觉分级系统,表明良好(a /B级)到中度(C级)的灌注通常可以保证吻合的安全性。然而,临界灌注(C级)具有额外的风险,特别是在老年患者或有合并症的患者中。我们对该系统进行了改进,以确定C级肠的选择性切除是否可以改善灌注并指导造口转移决策。方法:80例左侧结直肠癌患者行根治性手术治疗。术中观察边缘血管及粘膜出血情况。初始灌注分级指导决策:A/B级继续吻合,而C级进一步切除以提升灌注。对于持续C级或预防性的高危患者进行造口转移。结果:80例患者中,67例(83.8%)为A/B级,13例(16.3%)为初始c级。额外切除(平均4.5 cm)使9例(69.2%)患者的灌注提高到最终B级,实现了初级吻合。总体而言,12例患者(15.0%)接受了造口术:4例为持续性C级患者,8例为高危适应症患者,尽管最终灌注足够。76例最终A/B级患者吻合口漏和缺血性结肠炎发生率均为0%。C级患者手术时间更长(108.8分钟vs 86.6分钟,P=0.003)。需要转移的患者年龄较大,合并症较多。结论:术中积极应用视力分级系统提升边缘灌注,术后并发症发生率低。该方法为支持术中临床判断和优化吻合口安全性提供了简单实用的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书