New Tools, Big Questions: Is Unconventional Monetary Policy Driving Real Change?—Evidence From Listed Companies in China, the U.S., and Japan

IF 2.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
FINANCIAL REVIEW Pub Date : 2026-07-02 Epub Date: 2025-12-24 DOI:10.1111/fire.70046
Xue Li, Lanshan Gui, Pingping Wang
{"title":"New Tools, Big Questions: Is Unconventional Monetary Policy Driving Real Change?—Evidence From Listed Companies in China, the U.S., and Japan","authors":"Xue Li,&nbsp;Lanshan Gui,&nbsp;Pingping Wang","doi":"10.1111/fire.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In response to slowing growth and financial uncertainty, central banks have increasingly adopted unconventional monetary policies (UMPs). Using panel fixed-effects models with financial data from listed firms in China, the United States, and Japan during 2011–2021, this paper examines the impact of UMPs on corporate financing and cross-country heterogeneity. Robustness is confirmed through endogeneity checks, variable substitution, and external shocks. The results show that the use of UMPs in China and the United States can increase debt financing ratio of companies, but the similar  policies in Japan have the opposite effect. Policy effects differ by firm size and age, with smaller and younger firms more sensitive. Financial and political efficiency could moderate transmission. Furthermore, through the variable slope model, among the three countries, the impact of UMP on corporate debt was the strongest in China, while it was weaker in the United States and Japan. Overall, the study highlights substantial cross-country and institutional heterogeneity in UMP transmission, offering empirical evidence for differentiated policy design and insights into optimizing monetary policy tools.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47617,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","volume":"61 3","pages":"901-925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.70046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to slowing growth and financial uncertainty, central banks have increasingly adopted unconventional monetary policies (UMPs). Using panel fixed-effects models with financial data from listed firms in China, the United States, and Japan during 2011–2021, this paper examines the impact of UMPs on corporate financing and cross-country heterogeneity. Robustness is confirmed through endogeneity checks, variable substitution, and external shocks. The results show that the use of UMPs in China and the United States can increase debt financing ratio of companies, but the similar  policies in Japan have the opposite effect. Policy effects differ by firm size and age, with smaller and younger firms more sensitive. Financial and political efficiency could moderate transmission. Furthermore, through the variable slope model, among the three countries, the impact of UMP on corporate debt was the strongest in China, while it was weaker in the United States and Japan. Overall, the study highlights substantial cross-country and institutional heterogeneity in UMP transmission, offering empirical evidence for differentiated policy design and insights into optimizing monetary policy tools.

新工具,大问题:非常规货币政策推动了真正的变革吗?——来自中国、美国和日本上市公司的证据
为应对经济增长放缓和金融不确定性,各国央行越来越多地采取非常规货币政策。本文采用面板固定效应模型,以2011-2021年中国、美国和日本上市公司的财务数据为样本,研究了跨国并购对企业融资和跨国异质性的影响。鲁棒性是通过内生性检查,变量替代和外部冲击确认。研究结果表明,中国和美国使用UMPs可以提高企业的债务融资比例,而日本的类似政策则适得其反。政策影响因公司规模和年龄而异,较小和较年轻的公司更敏感。财政和政治效率可以减缓传播。此外,通过变斜率模型,在三国中,非常规货币政策对企业债务的影响在中国最强,而在美国和日本较弱。总体而言,该研究突出了非常规货币政策传导中的重大跨国和制度异质性,为差异化政策设计和优化货币政策工具提供了经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL REVIEW BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
28.10%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书